Started By
Message

re: Arkansas 2020 is Arkansas 2019 with a better turnover margin

Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:30 pm to
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37600 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

should have


Arkansas fans use these words a lot
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46590 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

You can make stats say whatever you want to believe but the eye test tells a much different story.


Take out just the three pick 6s, nothing else, and look at the film and the numbers.

In this instance Arkansas is 0-4 despite getting 11 total turnovers in those 4 games. They have slightly worse average total offensive and defensive yardage totals compared to last year, slightly fewer penalties per game, almost identical YPP offensively and less TOP. On film, between the turnovers they still look largely inept on offense, struggling stopping teams and don’t block well. The turnovers are putting a nice bow on a similar overall product.

By nearly every objective metric, Arkansas 2020 is Arkansas 2019 with an impressive TO margin and several defensive scores.
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 10:34 pm
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32769 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:32 pm to
This thread is about advanced stats etc so it seemed applicable. A&M better hope Arkansas isn’t any better this year because they struggled mightily with the shitty 2019 version.
Posted by Porcine Human
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since Feb 2016
11225 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Take out just the three pick 6s,


why?
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27606 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

why?


Because he said so
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80646 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

TWO teams have won a game in which they lost the turnover margin -5 or more.


One of those was Hawai'i over Arizona in 2019 with a -7 turnover margin. What was the other?
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 10:51 pm
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32769 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

Take out just the three pick 6s, nothing else, and look at the film and the numbers.

Because the offense would play the exact same game if those turnovers didn’t exist? Of course not.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46590 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

why?


Because the claim was Arkansas does a lot better than last year, not just force turnovers. Objectively they don’t. And moreover, turnovers (and particularly defensive scores) are a notoriously fickle stat.

Arkansas consistently loses the LOS on both sides of the ball and is generally inferior to their opposition at passing the ball, running the ball and stopping the run. The macro view is a team getting by in the short term with an unsustainable long term prognosis.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40909 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:36 pm to
We lost to those three teams by an average score of 45-17 last year but yes this team is the exact same as last year. Fantasy land in this thread.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46590 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

Because the offense would play the exact same game if those turnovers didn’t exist?


Each game cane down to the final minutes, so yeah probably. It’s not like you blew them out and went into a shell. Franks was still trying to hold off OM because you couldn’t put a team away despite 11 combined turnovers/failed conversions.
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32769 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:39 pm to
How does one even quantify how good a team would have played if its quarterback didn’t throw 6 interceptions? That’s the crux of this conversation. That’s a lot to filter out.
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27606 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:39 pm to
It’s fun, same things State and Ole Miss fans have said. A&M is basically a similar program to them with a better PR department.
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 10:41 pm
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32769 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:40 pm to
7 of Ole Miss’s points essentially came off special teams. Is that sustainable?
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25333 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:41 pm to
You think Odom gonna keep giving teams the same look? Some kinda special aren’t ya?

Trying to be the smartest guy in the room is not a good look
Posted by Porcine Human
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since Feb 2016
11225 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:41 pm to
This team comes up clutch in big moments, sorry you can't see that
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46590 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

We lost to those three teams by an average score of 45-17 last year but yes this team is the exact same as last year. Fantasy land in this thread.



OM would have beaten you by about that margin had they managed to only turn it over say, 3 times. They left 20-30 points on the field between refusing to kick field goals and turnovers deep into Arkansas territory.

State would have beaten you something like 31-14 with just two turnovers instead of 4.

The two teams combined for 0 points on 6 specified drives inside the Arkansas 30, many of which were due to unforced errors, drops and penalties.

Both of those examples still give those opponents more average turnovers than your opposition did last year on average through 4 games.

Arkansas is avoiding what would otherwise be blowout losses because of hilariously one sided TO margins, which is the point.
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 10:44 pm
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27606 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:44 pm to
tFear is real. You don’t go through all this trouble and research without being scared. A simple acknowledgement that the Hogs are much improved and will give Aggie a tough game as usual is really all that needs to be said.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25333 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:47 pm to
Never mind we were down 4 1st game starters and a couple more on the 2 deep. We are pulled a kid off scout team this week to play LB. this bye week is at worst time for Ags
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46590 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

You think Odom gonna keep giving teams the same look?


He has so far, apart from box alignment changes against State because of their scheme. He ran largely the same base coverages though, he runs almost exclusively deep drop cover 2 and cover 3 (with a little cover 4) cloud zones and varies which positions move into which zones. It’s the same thing he’s been running since he was DC at Missouri. His philosophy is that most coaches/players are not disciplined enough to take the 5-6 yard plays over and over and will turn it over either out of frustration or a determination to be “balanced” and “stretch the field”. When teams insist on throwing down field, QBs get confused because it’s hard to read where the safeties and line backers will drop on any given play.

He’s always gotten shredded by teams who thank him for the free yards all day and don’t try and force balls down the field into heavy cloud zones.

So yeah, probably. And I expect A&M to name their total rushing yardage number if he does.
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 10:53 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80646 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

A&M better hope Arkansas isn’t any better this year because they struggled mightily with the shitty 2019 version.


A&M had probably the weakest offensive lineman in the entire conference as their starting center last season.

Now that Colton Prater is no longer eligible and Ryan McCollum, who is taller, bigger, faster and better, is now the starting center, the run game has improved and the pass protection has GREATLY improved.

Tackles for loss allowed (first 4 SEC games)

2019 - 27.0
2020 - 14.0

Sacks allowed (first 4 SEC games)

2019 - 16.0
2020 - 2.0
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter