Started By
Message
re: BREAKING Alabama Associate AD took 25k to steer players to Atlanta financial advisor
Posted on 9/28/17 at 9:31 pm to trippnbama
Posted on 9/28/17 at 9:31 pm to trippnbama
quote:
Hope you're right.If not the new SEC slogan might be "It just means more,until the FBI comes knocking on the door.
When the FBI knocks, it means a lot more.
0
Posted on 9/28/17 at 9:32 pm to AU24
Mine, and every Bama fan's reaction to this thread:
frickkkkk! Knew it was a matter of time but shite!!!!
nevermind, its basketball, we good.
quote:
BREAKING Alabama Associate AD took 25k to steer players to Atlanta financial advisor
frickkkkk! Knew it was a matter of time but shite!!!!
quote:
NBA
nevermind, its basketball, we good.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 10:39 pm to PearlJam
Alabama cheating again. What’s new.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 10:40 pm to JustGetItRight
quote:
Probable worst case based on what is in the public arena is Alabama loses Colin Sexton
I'd melt. How many programs have had two 5-stars locked down, only to lose them in the last second.
Even Pollard ended up leaving after 1 year.
This post was edited on 9/28/17 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 9/28/17 at 10:57 pm to Gary Busey
Holy shite this Michel guy is the dude Dominique fricked up at a Hawks game? I vividly remember that.
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:09 pm to Roaring Cowboy
quote:
Alabama cheating again.
Just keep telling yourself whatever you need to in order to feel better about it all
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:58 pm to bamasgot13
No worries for AU and UA... the NCAA will investigate and render a decision.
In Spring of 2022.
In Spring of 2022.
Posted on 9/29/17 at 6:13 am to TTsTowel
quote:
On a serious note, without having read through the thread, can someone unbiased give me a rundown on what’s going on? Is Alabama fricked, like Auburn, or not?
Basically, just a small amount of this:
Some of this:
A little of this:
A lot of this:
This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 6:15 am
Posted on 9/29/17 at 6:56 am to NYCAuburn
quote:On the contrary. Judge it exactly the same.
So throw everything you were saying yesterday when it pertained to Auburn out the window...
Never change...
Posted on 9/29/17 at 7:08 am to NYCAuburn
quote:There's no change at all. You seem to be confusing what the NCAA or FBI are going to do and what Auburn will/should do pertaining to their program. I'm of the opinion that a coach with the history of Pearl would not be retained because of the negative reflection it would have on Auburn as an institution. You obviously are looking at it differently...so be it.
This is hilarious. Quite the change of tune.
Posted on 9/29/17 at 7:45 am to coachcrisp
quote:
There's no change at all.
Yes there is, it's hilarious you dont see. I guess its too much bama in you
quote:
You seem to be confusing what the NCAA or FBI are going to do and what Auburn will/should do pertaining to their program. I'm of the opinion that a coach with the history of Pearl would not be retained because of the negative reflection it would have on Auburn as an institution. You obviously are looking at it differently...so be it.
yes this is different than you were saying previously. it's cute, keep it up...
Posted on 9/29/17 at 8:12 am to Danger54
This is the best comment I have read in weeks on this board.
Posted on 9/29/17 at 8:22 am to NYCAuburn
Reread my posts on the subject. My direction was/is one of what Auburn should do about their situation with Pearl. The guy's already got a huge shite stain on his reputation and Auburn took, and is continuing to take, a hit for hiring him. If there is ANY chance that he was complicit, even remotely, I don't see how Auburn would allow for the "stoning" they'd take from the rest of the world....or maybe they would......it wouldn't be their first rodeo.
Posted on 9/29/17 at 8:34 am to coachcrisp
quote:
I don't see how Auburn would allow for the "stoning" they'd take from the rest of the world....or maybe they would......it wouldn't be their first rodeo
If he has anything to do with it then he is gone.
There won't be any "stoning" of Auburn if Pearl has nothing to do with it. I don't know how true it is, but our president gave an interview to ESPN the other day. He talked about how the FBI stressed this had nothing to do with any other individuals, and that Chuck was a lone actor.
Posted on 9/29/17 at 8:45 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
He talked about how the FBI stressed this had nothing to do with any other individuals, and that Chuck was a lone actor.
and said Auburn was the victim.
Posted on 9/29/17 at 8:50 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:Therein lies the problem...it's called public perception. With Pearl's history, I suspect that there needs to be a solid statement from the FBI to that effect, or you're gonna have another Cam & Daddy situation on your hands.....but hell, y'all weathered that, so....as I said, this won't be y'all's first rodeo.
There won't be any "stoning" of Auburn if Pearl has nothing to do with it.
Posted on 9/29/17 at 9:37 am to coachcrisp
Why, to appease Bama fans? Who gives a frick what you all think.
This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 9:55 am
Posted on 9/29/17 at 9:59 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
and said Auburn was the victim
While true, the FBI determines blame and victims based on law. They don't care about NCAA rules.
The NCAA will investigate and determine if AU should or could have known. The best thing AU has going for it is the illegal actions were not intended to benefit the team or school. At this point it apperears to be the contrary. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.
This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 10:00 am
Posted on 9/29/17 at 10:06 am to borotiger
We are almost there guys. We can pass the Auburn thread soon.
Posted on 9/29/17 at 10:22 am to CapstoneGrad06
6 of Bama's alleged national championship are bogus.
Page 27 of 32
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News