Started By
Message
Two Years In
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:26 am
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:26 am
Who has accomplished more in the first two years in the League, A&M or Mizzu ? Consider all sports (Men and Women).
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:27 am to Irons Puppet
Hmmm, I have no idea what the other sports have done outside of Football.
Didnt A&M make it to a regional this year in baseball?
And they actually won something(JFF's Heisman).
You gotta go with A&M.
ETA: Forgot that Mizzou won the East last year. I guess that counts for something.
Didnt A&M make it to a regional this year in baseball?
And they actually won something(JFF's Heisman).
You gotta go with A&M.
ETA: Forgot that Mizzou won the East last year. I guess that counts for something.
This post was edited on 6/25/14 at 11:29 am
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:27 am to Irons Puppet
quote:
Mizzu
idk but one of the Mizzou posters is about to flip his shite
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:27 am to Irons Puppet
It's the Conference, and it's Mizzou, because they got to an SEC Championship.
Because if we're being real, football is the only measuring stick that matters.
Because if we're being real, football is the only measuring stick that matters.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:28 am to craigbiggio
quote:
idk but one of the Mizzou posters is about to flip his shite
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:29 am to Irons Puppet
quote:
Consider all sports (Men and Women).
What have they done in the non-revenue sports?
In football, its Mizzou.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:30 am to Irons Puppet
A&M. They elevated themselves into a big time program after finishing 3rd in the West in 2012.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:31 am to polydorr
quote:
It's the Conference, and it's Mizzou, because they got to an SEC Championship.
Wouldn't the 2013 MM first round knockout that broke all our brackets negate that?
I can't see this as a plus over Oklahoma/OSU being in the SEC.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:31 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Forgot that Mizzou won the East last year. I guess that counts for something.
I think a lot of people would've won the east last year, A&M included
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:38 am to beaver
quote:
I think a lot of people would've won the east last year, A&M included
Agreed.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:42 am to Irons Puppet
Football (three points per win)
Missouri - 17 wins = 51 points
Texas A&M - 20 wins = 60 point
Basketball (two points per win)
Missouri - 46 wins = 92 points
Texas A&M - 36 wins = 72 point
Baseball (one point per win)
Missouri - 38 wins = 38 points
Texas A&M - 70 wins = 70 points
Total wins - total points
Missouri - 101 wins - 181 points
Texas A&M - 126 wins - 202 points
Missouri - 17 wins = 51 points
Texas A&M - 20 wins = 60 point
Basketball (two points per win)
Missouri - 46 wins = 92 points
Texas A&M - 36 wins = 72 point
Baseball (one point per win)
Missouri - 38 wins = 38 points
Texas A&M - 70 wins = 70 points
Total wins - total points
Missouri - 101 wins - 181 points
Texas A&M - 126 wins - 202 points
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:43 am to beaver
quote:
I think a lot of people would've won the east last year, A&M included
This post was edited on 6/25/14 at 11:44 am
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:45 am to Tornado Alley
quote:
quote:
I think a lot of people would've won the east last year, A&M included
Shots fired
That's pretty accurate no party foul today....
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:46 am to Tornado Alley
There has to be bonus points based on their place within the Divisions.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:46 am to beaver
quote:
I think a lot of people would've won the east last year, A&M included
A&M couldn't even beat Missouri. What makes you think they would have won the east over them?
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:48 am to Irons Puppet
quote:
There has to be bonus points based on their place within the Divisions.
Come up with your own damn metric
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:49 am to beaver
quote:
I think a lot of people would've won the east last year, A&M included
But didn't MIzz beat AM last year?
Mizz has accomplished more so far
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News