What? Your post doesn't make much sense so I'll try to answer what I think your trying to say. My point was that LSU had Shea and he was LSUs to lose....if LSU would have found a way to have kept his brother on staff LSU would have the #1 QB in the country enrolled at LSU this semester. That's a garuntee....not a guess. I worked out with Shea 6 days a week and he was 100% LSU even with Frank's committed....a guy like Shea isn't scared to compete and he knew he would beat out Frank's. Everyday we worked out all he talked about was LSU until word was his brother wouldn't have a job much longer and then Ole Miss started creeping in and then our convos became less about LSU and more about OM.

I also know it's impossible for LSU to get every LA recruit but some posters here act is if North LA isn't LSU territory when it could be if LSU put the effort in. It's become laid back in that part of the state and has caused some recruits to get away that usually hurt us down the road. Some of the SECs best players are LA boys.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by tigerfoot

Alexandria

Member since Sep 2006

56574 posts

Posted on 1/14/16 at 6:52 pm to Olddawg

So what you are saying is no matter the effort we put in with Shea we had to hire his brother for his services.

But you say the reason we lost is lack of effort. Does paying off brother equal effort?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by LSUJay13

South Louisiana

Member since May 2008

543 posts

Posted on 1/14/16 at 7:30 pm to Olddawg

quote:
if LSU would have found a way to have kept his brother on staff

It sounds like you just verified the general consensus of a package deal. Like I said before, I think he will be OK in college, but not going to be anywhere near #1 QB in his class when it is all said and done and definitely not going to push LSU into hiring a family member.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Bootballin

Member since Dec 2014

77 posts

Posted on 1/15/16 at 12:50 am to Olddawg