re: Male Student is Possibly Raped; Gets Expelled for Sexual Assaut

Do you know why it was "undisputed"?

He was deprived of his due process rights. He was procedurally prevent from cross examining his accuser. His only "recourse" was writing down questions that the panel had the ability to decide whether or not to ask. On top of that, she was allowed to write her responses to the question instead of audibly responding (which the investigator found she was capable of doing), which only works in favor of her credibility. Part of requiring a person to audibly respond is that you can assess the content of the statement as well as the tone and manner in which it is given.

This doesn't even address the fact that she lied to the investigator/panel, withheld exculpatory evidence (think Brady violation), he was deprived of having counsel present, the investigator had no subpoena power, etc.

Moreoecer, by Amherst own policies, they had/have (but refuse to look at) evidence showing that she committed sexual assault. In the immediate aftermath of the event, she texted a friend saying he was intoxicated.

Please explain how he gave affirmative consent to her when, in her own words, he was intoxicated and thus could not give consent to her performing oral sex on him?