Started By
Message

re: City of St. George - good or bad for the long term future of GBR area?

Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:55 pm to
Posted by uncommon sense
Member since Feb 2024
86 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:55 pm to
It will be good for the firm that gets to manage "privatized municipal services". Good for the first few go rounds of mayor & alderman or city council members as deals are made with the entities that will run things and provide services. Also good for the developers that buy up & shite up every undeveloped square foot of STG.

Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96703 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Also good for the developers that buy up & shite up every undeveloped square foot of STG.


Engquist et all have already been doing this the last 40+ years.

Only thing this does is sunset their bullshite by actually having a city there to regulate the area as well as prevent them from pretending the area is Baton Rouge.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram