Favorite team:Texas A&M 
Location:houston
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1752
Registered on:5/30/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
[quote]Baw, Id read this as an argument for climate change. Wild variations from the norm and extra precip (warmer planet, more water vapor in air). [/quote] We were told that climate change caused the drought we had last year....
[quote]As much as I love anything Larry David creates, he also supports the groups that destroy everything they touch.[/quote] Need to know who jerry voted for in the last election, and whether he will publicly endorse opposition to whoever left rolls out in 2024. Otherwise, this is meaningles...

re: Can this 747 take off?

Posted by G2160 on 4/11/24 at 12:58 pm
[quote]Well, this is wrong. The plane is supported by the wheels which are in contact with the treadmill. There's no way for the plane to move forward under the hypo.[/quote] The wheels are not in contact with the plane, at least in the direction of takeoff in this 1 dimensional thought exercise....

re: Can this 747 take off?

Posted by G2160 on 4/11/24 at 12:03 pm
I don’t think this argument, which requires you to disregard friction, the impracticality of a 747 treadmill, or any other number of real world conditions, was designed to get people thinking about lift, negative feedback loops, or the speed of the conveyor. It was designed to think about how the...

re: Can this 747 take off?

Posted by G2160 on 4/10/24 at 10:56 pm
[quote]It clearly says the treadmill goes as fast as the wheels. So no matter how much throttle the pilot applies, the plane stays stationary.[/quote] I think we would all agree that a plane could fly at a constant speed 10ft above a treadmill moving in an opposite direction but equal speed. Th...

re: Can this 747 take off?

Posted by G2160 on 4/10/24 at 6:44 pm
[quote]If you put a jet engine with wheels on a treadmill, and the engine has a max speed of, say, 800 mph, and the treadmill is moving at the exact same speed in the opposite direction, 800 mph, your stance is that the jet engine would move forward? [/quote] The engine would move forward even ...

re: Can this 747 take off?

Posted by G2160 on 4/10/24 at 4:46 pm
You could start this experiment with the treadmill spinning backwards at 1000mph and the plane tethered in place. As long as the plane is generating forward thrust and the wheels are free to spin, the plane will go forward when the tether is released....

re: Can this 747 take off?

Posted by G2160 on 4/10/24 at 4:34 pm
The engines push against air around the plane (or in proportion to the mass flow rate of exhaust out of the engine), not the ground. The free-spinning wheels make the conveyor irrelevant....

re: GA Judge Mcafee in Rico case

Posted by G2160 on 3/20/24 at 12:07 pm
[quote]Do you think the judge just jumps over the bench and arrests them himself, like Judge Dredd? [/quote] Because this is a claim anyone was making? Is it tiring being the contentious edgelord douchebag in every thread?...

re: Anyone fall for these emails:

Posted by G2160 on 3/15/24 at 10:08 pm
[quote]So what’s in the video clips they sent?[/quote]...
This seems like either defamation or election interference. Probably both....
Travis county voted for Biden 3:1 over Trump. Austin proper was probably worse. That isn’t fraud....
[quote]Kinda late[/quote] The first step to increasing election security is to expose and make public that manipulation happened and how it is implemented. In that sense, it isn’t too late....
The average US citizen would fold when the first illegal hungry homeless kid gets a puff piece in the news and we would be right back to paying for all of it. We aren’t getting rid of the illegals....
[quote]It’s going to be harder to cheat this year. [/quote] No it isn’t. What we learned was that there was a small window to actually investigate an election in time for meaningful change (if necessary) and that the people holding the data will stonewall anyone trying to investigate it until th...
They would do this in a heartbeat if they could. They tried twice already....
[quote]SFST != breath chemical test. I’m not aware of a single state that has any penalty whatsoever for refusing SFST.[/quote] I assume that they’re going to breathalyze if you refuse SFST? So what’s the point of an SFST? To further build a case against you?...
[quote]Hard.. HARD.. lessons being learned all over the country[/quote] The buck will be passed up the food chain until the money printer eventually solves the problem....