Started By
Message
re: South Carolina started 9 true freshman and 19 first year starters
Posted on 10/31/16 at 7:55 am to WG_Dawg
Posted on 10/31/16 at 7:55 am to WG_Dawg
That's a good question. To me, it means their coaches are coaching up what and who they have and making it work. They are not world beaters, but they are putting a team together that can execute the plays they call.
1
Posted on 10/31/16 at 7:57 am to Peter Buck
I bet they actually have some players at OL, WR, etc., that actually belong in the SEC
Posted on 10/31/16 at 8:01 am to Spaceman Spiff
Deebo Samuel and Bryan Edwards are both better than any outside receiver we have, and their OL is at least bigger than ours.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 8:01 am to Spaceman Spiff
Strong post Spiff
Posted on 10/31/16 at 8:06 am to Peter Buck
Who would have thought that Messchump would get his first signature SEC win before Smart?
Posted on 10/31/16 at 8:06 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Deebo Samuel and Bryan Edwards are both better than any outside receiver we have, and their OL is at least bigger than ours.
Alabama's OL averages 6LBS heavier than ours. Does 6 LBS make that much difference? Maybe the true culprit is our training table.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 8:15 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Deebo Samuel and Bryan Edwards are both better than any outside receiver we have, and their OL is at least bigger than ours.
Debo might be 6' tall and he was a 3 star.
Edwards was signed by the first year coach. UGA signed one WR ranked higher and one ranked the same as him.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 8:21 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Deebo Samuel
Only 6'
hmm
Posted on 10/31/16 at 8:24 am to Peter Buck
quote:
Debo might be 6' tall and he was a 3 star.
Edwards was signed by the first year coach. UGA signed one WR ranked higher and one ranked the same as him.
They are still better. Recruiting services get it wrong sometimes.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 8:27 am to Crowknowsbest
They certainly appear to be better. USC must just be lucky in that regards.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 8:40 am to TigerinUGA
quote:
UT was not as focused and had much less to play for
Not focused yes, but less to play for??? They are in a 2 team race (well, I guess 3 if you count Kentucky) for the SEC East title. If anything USCe had nothing to play for, much like UGA against UF on Saturday.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 12:35 pm to Peter Buck
Not gonna lie, their 17 year old freshman is better than ours. That guy is going to be a force the next 3 years.
Hopefully, the rest of their team sucks.
Hopefully, the rest of their team sucks.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 2:32 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
And we went to columbia and beat that same team relatively easily.
Easy? if not for a fluke onside kick return all the way for a TD it would have been a 1 possession game.
Statistics really close. the only thing we had a good clear advantage over them was TOP.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 2:38 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
They are still better. Recruiting services get it wrong sometimes.
They do, but how do you know they got it wrong and it isn't coaching?
It's easy to say a kid has more talent because of statistics, but there are several RB's with more statistics than Fournette and Chubb. Eye test? There are way too many factors when it comes to determining if one kid is better than another. We might have an opinion, but who would have thought Tom Brady would have turned out so well?
Posted on 10/31/16 at 2:41 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
They do, but how do you know they got it wrong and it isn't coaching?
They are just clearly better overall athletes. I suppose that's just the eye test.
I think Ridley will be a good player, but he's not as explosive as either of them and not as big as Edwards.
ETA: Samuel was rated 92 (4*) and Edwards 94 (also 4*) by 247. It's not like they came out of nowhere
This post was edited on 10/31/16 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 10/31/16 at 2:44 pm to Peter Buck
Your lucky posts are so annoying.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 2:54 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
think Ridley will be a good player, but he's not as explosive as either of them and not as big as Edwards.
I am very excited about Ridley. Looks to have very good hands. I think he might be considered our best receiver by the end of next season.
Posted on 10/31/16 at 3:00 pm to td01241
quote:
Your lucky posts are so annoying.
Why? South Carolina is getting lower ranked players and they are all panning out, while all of ours are apparently missing. I would be willing to bet that our OL, WR, DB, LB and DL (As a unit) were all ranked higher than USC's. What else could it be?
(I think that is the point he is making)
Posted on 10/31/16 at 3:02 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
I would be willing to bet that our OL, WR, DB, LB and DL (As a unit) were all ranked higher than USC's
That's probably why we beat them
Posted on 10/31/16 at 3:06 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
That's probably why we beat them
Actually, it's probably why we should have beaten them by 21+ points, instead of having to return and onside kick all the way back to win by 14.
Page 2 of 5
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News