Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/13/13 at 10:40 am to Hell'sBelle
i know, old days DR was the tits. the negativity from 2010 was palpable, it was nice. we certainly wouldn't celebrate giving richt a raise, that's for sure 
but seriously, i get the extension i guess but i still have issue with giving anyone raises. he ain't leaving so idk what gives.
ETA: did we mess with his buyout at all?
but seriously, i get the extension i guess but i still have issue with giving anyone raises. he ain't leaving so idk what gives.
ETA: did we mess with his buyout at all?
This post was edited on 2/13/13 at 10:44 am
Posted on 2/13/13 at 10:47 am to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
did we mess with his buyout at all?
He basically doesn't have a buyout anymore. His contract is largely incentive-based
Posted on 2/13/13 at 10:50 am to Crowknowsbest
i remember that i'm just glad we aren't making it any harder on ourselves. if that's still the case then frick it, give richt a contract through 2020 for all i care
Posted on 2/13/13 at 10:52 am to Crowknowsbest
A 400k raise for maintaining status quo is fricking bizarre to me. I wish I could get a 14% raise for almost closing that deal last year.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 10:59 am to FinleyStreet
quote:
A 400k raise for maintaining status quo is fricking bizarre to me. I wish I could get a 14% raise for almost closing that deal last year.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 11:07 am to FinleyStreet
Rewarding someone for "almost" accomplishing a task defines the pussification of America. I wonder if the athletic department will give all the players all a nice National Championship ring because you know we ALMOST beat bama and we were ONLY 5 yards away
Posted on 2/13/13 at 11:26 am to Cherokee Chinstrap
Where's leghumper?
Posted on 2/13/13 at 11:36 am to Hell'sBelle
I have no problem with the actual extension, I actually like it because it should only help us in recruiting. My beef is strictly related to the 400K raise.
This post was edited on 2/13/13 at 11:37 am
Posted on 2/13/13 at 11:36 am to Cherokee Chinstrap
It's sad how you people can't see through your pessimism to realize the silver lining in all of this . . . .
Look........When Richt's salary is increased by 400K, this means that the government will get to confiscate nearly half of that!!!!!!!
In other words, our wisemen rulers in DC will now be able to use this influx of cash to pay China the equivalent of one one-zillionth of a penny towards the interest on our unpayable debt to them!
Yeeeeeeeeeeooooooooooowwww!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We're saved! Life is gooooooooooooooooooooood!...............
:smoke-if-ya-got-'em emoticon:
Look........When Richt's salary is increased by 400K, this means that the government will get to confiscate nearly half of that!!!!!!!
In other words, our wisemen rulers in DC will now be able to use this influx of cash to pay China the equivalent of one one-zillionth of a penny towards the interest on our unpayable debt to them!
Yeeeeeeeeeeooooooooooowwww!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We're saved! Life is gooooooooooooooooooooood!...............
:smoke-if-ya-got-'em emoticon:
Posted on 2/13/13 at 11:37 am to Hell'sBelle
quote:He's been banished to the The Sidewalker.
Where's leghumper?
Posted on 2/13/13 at 11:45 am to Jefferson Dawg
Again, I strictly believe that the 400K could have been allocated more efficiently. IMO it should have been spent on hiring ST and recruiting consults/assistants.
I really don't see how this is pessimistic, I'm not trying to claim that the sky is falling or that it was an awful decision that will ruin the program. I just don't agree with rewarding someone who failed to meet the expectations that were placed on them.
I really don't see how this is pessimistic, I'm not trying to claim that the sky is falling or that it was an awful decision that will ruin the program. I just don't agree with rewarding someone who failed to meet the expectations that were placed on them.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 12:05 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Tell him to change his handle to the buttfricker and come back.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:17 pm to Hell'sBelle
4th highest paid in conference for being 3rd best coach, i dont see a problem financially.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 1:26 pm to deeprig9
Not sure if it would've helped but it seems like announcing this the Tues. before NSD woulda been a hella lot better than the Tues. after... 
I'm assuming it could've been worked out before...
I'm assuming it could've been worked out before...
This post was edited on 2/13/13 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 2/13/13 at 2:47 pm to dallasga6
needed to know grantham deal first, might need that cash for new d staff
Posted on 2/13/13 at 8:31 pm to Hell'sBelle
quote:
I miss the Rant.
I do too, Belle, I do too.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 9:42 pm to deeprig9
3rd best? Let's wait until the current boy under achiever (no offense) quarterback leaves us once again with no proven starting quaterback. It is not his fault but it is the highly paid coaches fault. He may once again be the 8th best coach along with dodo head the OC. Just saying. All positive.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 8:35 am to JimDawginTexas
That and the questionable ability to stop the run. We need to adopt a Gurshall offense that is totally focused on controlling the clock next year to keep our D out of trouble.
If we do that, then the coaches will have earned their keep. This move with CMR was a year too early IMO.
If we do that, then the coaches will have earned their keep. This move with CMR was a year too early IMO.
Posted on 2/14/13 at 9:36 am to SquatchDawg
We'll see next season if this raise is worth it. Yes we went 12-2 but our schedule was on the softer side compared to USC or others. If we go 12-2 or better next year then you've got to admit he's worth it.
I do agree the money could be better allocated in other areas and be more beneficial. Like recruiting, facilities, or incentives.
Incentives need to be spread through the entire coaching staff and I mean reasonable base salaries with big beefy incentives.
I do agree the money could be better allocated in other areas and be more beneficial. Like recruiting, facilities, or incentives.
Incentives need to be spread through the entire coaching staff and I mean reasonable base salaries with big beefy incentives.
Page 3 of 4
Latest Georgia News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News