Started By
Message
re: My sources tell me Tuesday.....it's Bloomgren
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:43 am to Crowknowsbest
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:43 am to Crowknowsbest
If it's not Bloomgren then the only other guy that I want is Dave Warner, but that's not going to happen.
2
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:44 am to Sanford&MunSon
quote:
If it's not Bloomgren then the only other guy that I want is Dave Warner, but that's not going to happen.
I like him too.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:45 am to Prettyboy Floyd
Besides the oft injured Montgomery, can you name another Stanford WR without looking it up? This was NOT the same Stanford team that won the conference in 2012 and 2013. They were rebuilding on the OL, didn't have the typical bruising RB that Stanford needs (like Stepfan Taylor), and no, Hogan isn't a good enough QB to carry an offense that doesn't have a great running game.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:46 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
We need an OC that is a big fan of handing the ball off.
Bob Hall loves to hand the ball off. If this is our requirment.
quote:
I don't care how well they recruit. I'm looking at what's on the field. Roper had Driskel and a true freshman at QB. That wasn't going to go well. Combine that with bad receivers and limited depth on the OL and you get the 2014 UF offense.
The offensive coordinators recruit these guys. So in the case of Bloomgren he should be omitted immediately. He obviously sucks at talent evaluation as well as doing his job. I would take Hogan over Mason based on his legs alone.
quote:
I don't care how well they recruit.
You should
Not sure why you guys are defending Roper and Bloomgren. They both have proven that they are mediocre so I guess if they suck for us we can have something to blame.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:47 am to VADawg
quote:
Besides the oft injured Montgomery, can you name another Stanford WR without looking it up? This was NOT the same Stanford team that won the conference in 2012 and 2013. They were rebuilding on the OL, didn't have the typical bruising RB that Stanford needs (like Stepfan Taylor), and no, Hogan isn't a good enough QB to carry an offense that doesn't have a great running game.
Whose fault is that....Here let me help you. THE COACHING STAFFS.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:48 am to Prettyboy Floyd
You're missing something here. It's much, much easier to recruit great HS football players to Georgia than it is to Stanford. This run they have been on is amazing considering the academic restrictions that school has in place. Stanford can't consistently reload and be a powerhouse every season; they will have some down years because of this.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 9:50 am
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:50 am to VADawg
quote:
Stanford
Agreed that they've been on a tear, in spite of being handcuffed with their entrance requirements. "Harvard of the West," and all that.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:51 am to Prettyboy Floyd
It's also about realistic hires that fit our philosophy. Riley, Meachem, Helton, etc. are all spread guys. If they were hired they to would have to learn on the job.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:51 am to VADawg
quote:
This run they have been on is amazing considering the academic restrictions that school has in place.
I can't argue with that. But lots of teams....Mizzouri for instance make do with limited talent to produce good offenses. It's just another excuse for him being mediocre.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:52 am to Sanford&MunSon
quote:
It's also about realistic hires that fit our philosophy.
It's obvious that our philosophy is outdated is if the best guys we can find to fit our philosophy fielded 2 of the worst offenses in college football.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:54 am to Prettyboy Floyd
Missouri has had one good offense since they've been in the SEC (2013) and that was when they had everything fall into place with a senior riddled roster combined with injuries at UGA and UF. Their academic restrictions are nowhere near Stanford's. Stanford is more on Vanderbilt's level.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:55 am to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
It's obvious that our philosophy is outdated
41 points per game says otherwise.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:57 am to VADawg
quote:
41 points per game says otherwise.
Regression is about to become the norm
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:58 am to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
offensive coordinators recruit these guys
Roper recruited basically none of the offensive players at Florida. I think the only contributors were Treon Harris and Brandon Powell.
Bloomgren recruited great on the OL, which was his primary position. We'll have a BMac, Ball, and whoever the QB coach is to help with the rest.
quote:
I would take Hogan over Mason based on his legs alone.
Sounds like you just want a different offensive style.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:58 am to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Regression is about to become the norm
Why do you say that?
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:59 am to VADawg
How much of Stanford's success was directly related to Andrew Luck?
Posted on 1/5/15 at 10:01 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Why do you say that?
If we hire Roper or Bloomgren.
Do you believe we maintain 40ppg.
I would venture to say anything above 30 next year would be a miracle.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 10:01 am to Prettyboy Floyd
The last three years have been the three highest scoring teams we've ever had if I'm not mistaken. Pro style offense is still the best offense when the pieces are in place to run it. It's the best combination of big plays, physicality, power running, and ball control out there. You want these air raid guys but when's the last time any air raid offense has ever won anything significant? They put up big numbers against bad teams but bog down against really good defenses, and their own defenses usually suck.
Posted on 1/5/15 at 10:03 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Roper recruited basically none of the offensive players at Florida.
My qualms with Roper are primarily his playcalling. If you want to see Georgia with no short or intermediate passing game and no effort in the screen game. Then Roper is your guy.
Page 3 of 10
Latest Georgia News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News