Started By
Message
re: Magic Three... thoughts?
Posted on 7/24/16 at 10:52 am to GurleyGirl
Posted on 7/24/16 at 10:52 am to GurleyGirl
Sure, but there is nothing innovative about covering up a TE and turning him into a 250 lbs Tackle...
0
Posted on 7/24/16 at 12:55 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
We shouldn't base our O around this but at the goaline or 3/4th and short situations this could be lethal
Fully agree. I don't see this as being the primary formation for our offense, but just another wrinkle that could give us the opportunity to take advantage of that deep position group.
Posted on 7/24/16 at 1:04 pm to Peter Buck
quote:
Also, TE 2 is covered up unless they changed the rules. He can only be a blocker in this formation.
I only copied one image, there were several there and the article discusses it at more length. Incorporating pre-snap reads and movements may or may not change eligibility there, but again, it's about taking advantage of available talent pool.
Posted on 7/24/16 at 2:01 pm to fibonaccisquared
Did someone who played football write that? Just curious based on the formations.
Frankly, you can use Guys with TE frames as H backs or FBs that go in motion as well as running them in the Y... Good for blocking and a nice big target spread a tad further out into the zone.
Frankly, you can use Guys with TE frames as H backs or FBs that go in motion as well as running them in the Y... Good for blocking and a nice big target spread a tad further out into the zone.
Posted on 7/24/16 at 2:14 pm to Peter Buck
The author said he was a former coach
Posted on 7/24/16 at 6:57 pm to Peter Buck
Sounds like a Clemson spread with slow white kids.
Posted on 7/24/16 at 8:53 pm to VADawg
maube he made a mistake, but I'm not buying what he is selling...
Page 2 of 2
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News