Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/6/15 at 3:23 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:So 9-3 is good and should be praised? Squib kicks are good and should be praised? Coaching blunders are good and should be praised? These are what are holding us back. We should of beat USC and GT. With them wins we are in the playoffs. Why wouldn't that piss you off and wanna talk shite about it. 2 bone head coaching plays that cost us the game and quiet possible the NC. Win those two by being smart and we can shite the bed against UF like we usually do.
Seriously, just read his post history. It's only 3 pages. Almost the entirety of it is talking mad shite about richt or georgia. Guy sucks.
1st and goal, USE GURLEY, not H Mason. Winning w/ a few secs left in the game, kick it deep. Nope, 2 losses as a result. How do you not get pissed at this? We very easily could have been in the playoffs.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 3:24 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:Straw man.
Clear alter.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 3:43 pm to DawgGONIT
quote:
Yes your a genius. You found me out. I'm an alter b/c I do not 100% faith in Richt and b/c I question anything about UGA. That is sound logic you got there. You represent UGA well.
No, you're a bitch who's not even a good alter. Even the worst negadawgs have some good things to say about UGA. You on the other hand do nothing but bitch and bitch and bitch about all things UGA. You need to go ahead and log out and forget the password to this alter and create another one that's a little harder to spot.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 3:47 pm to DawgGONIT
quote:
DawgGONIT
Hey, Auburn sucks. I mean they really, really suck. 2nd rate academic institution whose entire identity rests in their football team. And since Auburn is the lil sis to Alabama AND Georgia, they are forced to rely on talented thug cast-offs from UGA and others to field a competitive team.
Since their greatest teams are populated with players who never really wanted to go to Auburn in the first place, it has made the average Auburn fan amazingly insecure and hopelessly jealous when it comes to UGA. This is especially true since UGA was the first choice of many Auburn students who had to go to Auburn as their second (or third or fourth) choice because they simply didn't have the grades and/or SAT score to get into UGA.
Auburn = the closest thing to a community college in the SEC. We mock them openly and laugh in their collective face.
________________________________________________________________
There, that should draw the Auburn in him out, if he's got any.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:15 pm to DawgGONIT
quote:
Maybe 2 of our RBs, Chubb and Michel. The others I'm not so sure. Douglas is good but not better than everyone else. K Marshall has good speed, but never could carry the load and has terrible balance. He hasn't proven himself in college, so again no he isn't better than all other running backs. Plus we don't know how he is off his latest injuries.
I'll put Marshall, Douglas, and Turman against any other #3, #4, and #5 rb on any other college football team.
What #3, #4, #5 rb on any other team is better than that group?
And generally speaking of run threats, having MacKenzie and Quayvon as hand-off options make Georgia's overall running game even more ridiculous.
Come at me bro.
This post was edited on 6/6/15 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:29 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
What have I've bitched about? I'm just tired of reading about UGA posts with you guys pumping sunshine out of your asses at 200%. I'm not being negative, I'm being real.
I said Richt is an above avg qb coach, who can produce when he has good talent. I said our Oline isn't one of the best units in the Nation, as we need to wait and see. But I tell you last season they weren't a top 10 line in the nation b/c our RBs were studs that made them look better. I think they were a top 25 unit.
I've also said our Oline talent has been lacking for years, but this past class and the future actually looks great in the trenches, which has been a big problem at UGA in the past.
Just b/c I'm not pumping sunshine out and saying UGA is the #1 program, when in reality we haven't done shite since 1980, with the most recent success coming in 2002 and 2005. I just think we can do better with the talent we have. Its a sad day in America to be called an alter just b/c you have different opinions on Richt. I bet if Bill Shank came on here and talked shite about Richt like he does on the radio, yall would call him a shitty attempt of an alter too. Some people just don't care for Richt that much, which is what all my "bitching" is based around.
I said Richt is an above avg qb coach, who can produce when he has good talent. I said our Oline isn't one of the best units in the Nation, as we need to wait and see. But I tell you last season they weren't a top 10 line in the nation b/c our RBs were studs that made them look better. I think they were a top 25 unit.
I've also said our Oline talent has been lacking for years, but this past class and the future actually looks great in the trenches, which has been a big problem at UGA in the past.
Just b/c I'm not pumping sunshine out and saying UGA is the #1 program, when in reality we haven't done shite since 1980, with the most recent success coming in 2002 and 2005. I just think we can do better with the talent we have. Its a sad day in America to be called an alter just b/c you have different opinions on Richt. I bet if Bill Shank came on here and talked shite about Richt like he does on the radio, yall would call him a shitty attempt of an alter too. Some people just don't care for Richt that much, which is what all my "bitching" is based around.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:30 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:
Hey, Auburn sucks. I mean they really, really suck. 2nd rate academic institution whose entire identity rests in their football team. And since Auburn is the lil sis to Alabama AND Georgia, they are forced to rely on talented thug cast-offs from UGA and others to field a competitive team.
Since their greatest teams are populated with players who never really wanted to go to Auburn in the first place, it has made the average Auburn fan amazingly insecure and hopelessly jealous when it comes to UGA. This is especially true since UGA was the first choice of many Auburn students who had to go to Auburn as their second (or third or fourth) choice because they simply didn't have the grades and/or SAT score to get into UGA.
Auburn = the closest thing to a community college in the SEC. We mock them openly and laugh in their collective face.
Preach on Brother! For as bad and backwards that Bama is, auburn is still little brother to them, which is even more pathetic.
This post was edited on 6/6/15 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:34 pm to DawgGONIT
quote:
Just b/c I'm not pumping sunshine out and saying UGA is the #1 program
1) talking shite about Georgia in every fricking post isn't "not pumping sunshine". Thats the main characteristic of an alter.
2) no one on here things we're the #1 program. This is a board full of level headed posters. The most level headed I've seen of any of the boards I visit.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:35 pm to DawgGONIT
All of your talking points have been regurgitated tens of thousands of times already by others long before you. But, it is funny how impressed you are at yourself for it.
Other than that, you seriously may be the most dull, boring, and unoriginal troll in GSB history.
Other than that, you seriously may be the most dull, boring, and unoriginal troll in GSB history.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:39 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I'll put Marshall, Douglas, and Turman against any other #3, #4, and #5 rb on any other college football team.
I like Douglas, but he is no starting SEC Back. ACC or Big 10 would be a better fit if he wanted to start.
Turman is so unproven, he missed all of last season. Who knows how good he will be, and how many practice heros have we known to have that aint done shite in the game?
Marshall, isn't proven dude. that is the whole point. His freshman year was pretty good, but he had a lot of 'dud' games. His sophomore season he had like 1 game where he got close to 100 yds. His balance is too big of a weakspot for someone who isn't as shifty as others and mainly relies on speed. Plus he missed more games in last season, on top of missing half his sophomore season. That is being injured 2 out of 3 years. That is scary and if you ignore being injury prone then go ahead. If you can guarantee that he is atleast 90% healthy for the 80% of teh season, then yeah he is probably better than most other 3rd string running backs.
I'm more worried about repeat injury for AJ T and K M than if they will produce if healthy.
Also, Arkansas has good depth, LSU has depth, Ohio St, and Oklahoma to name a few. I dont think these guys have had the injury bug at running back like we have at UGA.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:49 pm to gatorhata9
quote:
1) talking shite about Georgia in every fricking post isn't "not pumping sunshine". Thats the main characteristic of an alter.
So the squib kick and 1st and goal vs USC should just be ignored? Two losses that cost us big time, we should ignore that elephant in the room?
quote:
All of your talking points have been regurgitated tens of thousands of times already by others long before you.
Other than that, what shite have I said? I'm just tired of reading all you uga fans circle jerk each other. So what these topics have been mentioned before, I just created an account here so I ain't going to read a bunch of old shite. And if people are talking about a certain topic am I not suppose to talk about it too and just ignore it?
You guys are a bunch of pussies who can't take someone not suckin Richt's dick like rest of you. Richt is an above avg coach, but in the SEC we have some of the best of the best. He has been ranked by real sport writers/experts as being around top 4-6 coach in the SEC and not even a top 25 coach in america.
So I guess just ignore my old posts and I'll join in the Richt circle jerk. Richt is >>>> Saban >>> Bear byrant. Is that what yall wanted?
Also yall can't even have a debate w/ someone. Why can't yall use facts and shut me up with them? Yall take the straw man approach and assume you win the debate. You can't use the facts to shut me up about 1st and goal vs USC and the squib kick that cost us 2 games and out of the National playoffs. What strawman approach yall gonna take on that one?
This post was edited on 6/6/15 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:51 pm to DawgGONIT
quote:
I like Douglas, but he is no starting SEC Back. ACC or Big 10 would be a better fit if he wanted to start.
I listed him as a #4 you numb nuts.
I'll ask the question again.
What college football program has a #3, #4, and #5 on the running back depth chart that are better than Marshall, Turman, and Douglas?
Here's the trick...
Even if you just happen to know what you are talking about, and go up and down the rosters of all the top 25 teams and actually find 1 or 2 teams with an even deeper RB corps, that still puts UGA in the top tier, which is the whole point.
With Chubb as a clear #1, and Michel arguably the best #2 back, and our #3-#5 are also among the best backups, then what exactly is your point?
How does that make UGA's RB corps weak?
Posted on 6/6/15 at 6:56 pm to deeprig9
How can you count on them as 3rd or 4th string if they are hurt? Thats the point. Chubb and Douglas are the only ones to not miss games b/c of injury. If we continue to run Chubb the amount we have been, then he will get hurt too.
I also bet the LSU and Bama backfields can keep up w/ us as they ALWAYS have good depth. Ohio St too. I already said this shite for brains (see I can call names too).
When did I say we are weak at rbs? Now you are putting shite in my mouth that isn't true. I said our depth is injury prone which keeps us from being the true #1 team in the nation at RB. If all are healthy, we are the best team at RB, but our guys seem to have the injury bug.
I also bet the LSU and Bama backfields can keep up w/ us as they ALWAYS have good depth. Ohio St too. I already said this shite for brains (see I can call names too).
When did I say we are weak at rbs? Now you are putting shite in my mouth that isn't true. I said our depth is injury prone which keeps us from being the true #1 team in the nation at RB. If all are healthy, we are the best team at RB, but our guys seem to have the injury bug.
This post was edited on 6/6/15 at 6:58 pm
Posted on 6/6/15 at 7:00 pm to DawgGONIT
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/6/15 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 6/6/15 at 7:01 pm to DawgGONIT
I think the problem here is that your perception of your schtick, and reality, are two separate things.
A weakling with a weak schtick like yourself should have tried to single out one slow, possibly injured, member of the herd to confront.
Instead of taking on the whole board and the whole Richt era immediately.........with the most boring and dull regurgitated approach in GSB history.
Deeprig is going to rape you and sell you into slavery.
A weakling with a weak schtick like yourself should have tried to single out one slow, possibly injured, member of the herd to confront.
Instead of taking on the whole board and the whole Richt era immediately.........with the most boring and dull regurgitated approach in GSB history.
Deeprig is going to rape you and sell you into slavery.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 7:05 pm to DawgGONIT
quote:
How can you count on them as 3rd or 4th string if they are hurt? Thats the point. Chubb and Douglas are the only ones to not miss games b/c of injury. If we continue to run Chubb the amount we have been, then he will get hurt too.
I also bet the LSU and Bama backfields can keep up w/ us as they ALWAYS have good depth. Ohio St too.
When did I say we are weak at rbs? Now you are putting shite in my mouth that isn't true. I said our depth is injury prone which keeps us from being the true #1 team in the nation at RB. If all are healthy, we are the best team at RB, but our guys seem to have the injury bug.
Turman hurt his toe last fall and redshirted because he was behind Gurley, Marshall, Chubb, Michel, Douglas. He doesn't have an "injury bug."
Marshall tore his ATL in a nasty hit vs Tenn two years ago and was very slow to recover. That's 1 injury.
Michel broke his shoulder on 1 hit. That's one injury. One.
What are all these other injuries that make our backs injury prone? Educate me.
As was already said on the last page, and a couple times on this page, if anyone loses 3 running backs during the season, they are in big trouble.
Our running backs aren't any more injury prone than anyone else's.
You want to talk about Malcome Mitchell, that's a different story. I'll be the first one to say that guy is injury prone.
But this shite about the rb's is just Auburn jibber jabber, same shite they said about Gurley.
I didn't think you were an alter at first, I gave you the benefit of the doubt. I have changed my mind. No real Georgia fan would say what you are saying, the way you are saying it.
BeGON
Posted on 6/6/15 at 7:21 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Deeprig is going to rape you and sell you into slavery.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 7:33 pm to deeprig9
I uh, I agree with him on our RB depth. Michel had one injury last season, albeit a serious one. What bothers me is that he injured himself yet again in the Spring enough to only get limited minutes and was held out of the Spring game entirely. That's two injuries, at least, that have kept him from getting serious minutes. It's a concern.
Marshall is a great back, but he tried to come back once and looked bad, before he got hurt again - badly. You can say he came back too soon, but I doubt the coaches would have put him out there if they thought he wasn't ready. Then we heard he was ready again this Spring - and he got hurt again.
I have high hopes for Turman. But a toe injury kept him out an entire season. If he was healthy he would have played last season, especially in the Mizzou game when all we had were Chubb and Douglas. Turman looked great in the Spring game and I think he'd be a great #3 or even #2 option. But he's missed an entire season with an injury - so it is a concern.
Chubb actually was injured for the Tennessee game last year. He had surgery on his thumb. Can't recall the stats exactly, but I think he had 11 carries in that game for under 3 yards a carry. Fortunately we had Gurley running all pissed off like and didn't need Chubb that game. The thumb injury doesn't mean Chubb is injury prone, he clearly isn't. But given the rash of injuries with the #2, #3, and #4 RBs (I'm counting Douglas as #5 behind Turman, but even if Turman is #5 the point is the same), we could be one injury to Chubb away from Douglas as our only RB.
This is not farfetched - at all. It happened last year when we had the exact same RBs plus Gurley. Now Gurley is gone, and the two RBs that are supposed to replace him have - since he left - sustained more injuries.
Now, we've got one of the top two RBs in the country, so I wouldn't trade our situation with anybody. But we are a lot closer to a RB disaster next season than people are giving us credit for. If Chubb and just one of Marshall, Michel and Turman stay healthy next season - we are in great shape. But if they do - it will be a first.
So I'm concerned about it. Not enough to commit suicide or anything, but I think it's a valid concern.
Further affiant sayeth naught.
Marshall is a great back, but he tried to come back once and looked bad, before he got hurt again - badly. You can say he came back too soon, but I doubt the coaches would have put him out there if they thought he wasn't ready. Then we heard he was ready again this Spring - and he got hurt again.
I have high hopes for Turman. But a toe injury kept him out an entire season. If he was healthy he would have played last season, especially in the Mizzou game when all we had were Chubb and Douglas. Turman looked great in the Spring game and I think he'd be a great #3 or even #2 option. But he's missed an entire season with an injury - so it is a concern.
Chubb actually was injured for the Tennessee game last year. He had surgery on his thumb. Can't recall the stats exactly, but I think he had 11 carries in that game for under 3 yards a carry. Fortunately we had Gurley running all pissed off like and didn't need Chubb that game. The thumb injury doesn't mean Chubb is injury prone, he clearly isn't. But given the rash of injuries with the #2, #3, and #4 RBs (I'm counting Douglas as #5 behind Turman, but even if Turman is #5 the point is the same), we could be one injury to Chubb away from Douglas as our only RB.
This is not farfetched - at all. It happened last year when we had the exact same RBs plus Gurley. Now Gurley is gone, and the two RBs that are supposed to replace him have - since he left - sustained more injuries.
Now, we've got one of the top two RBs in the country, so I wouldn't trade our situation with anybody. But we are a lot closer to a RB disaster next season than people are giving us credit for. If Chubb and just one of Marshall, Michel and Turman stay healthy next season - we are in great shape. But if they do - it will be a first.
So I'm concerned about it. Not enough to commit suicide or anything, but I think it's a valid concern.
Further affiant sayeth naught.
Posted on 6/6/15 at 7:57 pm to DawgGONIT
quote:
Arkansas has good depth,
They have 2 stud rbs and with experience and that's it.
quote:
LSU has depth
Uh...no. They have one stud rb with experience. They did bring in another stud though.
quote:
Ohio St
They Elliott and????
quote:
Oklahoma
Now they might have a situation as good as us. They have Perine, Ross, and Ford, plus they get Mixon this year.
None of those have the depth that we have. Chubb and Michel match up with Arkansas' top two but they don't have the guys beyond that that we do.
Page 3 of 4
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News