Started By
Message

Admin please remove Jacket Fan 77 from this board.

Posted on 9/25/15 at 12:45 pm
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27294 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 12:45 pm
We had a freakin ban bet from the ND game and this bitch is not living up to the terms.

Minimum 2 months!
Posted by Spunky
Member since Mar 2013
10020 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 12:52 pm to
Link to ban bet?
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27294 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 12:55 pm to
On my phone but it was from Jefferson's post about GT being the "trendy pick vs ND"

You can find it in my post profile.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30541 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:05 pm to
LINK

quote:

JacketFan77


quote:

Permaban. Loser gets a permaban from the whole SECRant. I'll set it up with Chicken. You good with that?
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26172 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Permaban. Loser gets a permaban from the whole SECRant. I'll set it up with Chicken. You good with that?


LINK
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14160 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:13 pm to
I just read that series of posts and it looks like at least a 2 month ban is in order...if not the permaban as both originally agreed.

...AND RD makes Jimmy the Greek look like Monteg. You made the call....talked shite about it...took everyone's grief and won big.

This post was edited on 9/25/15 at 1:15 pm
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15649 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:14 pm to
From reading the stupididty of that thread in it's entirety it sounds like jacketfan asked the bet to be placed on the helpboard which sounds like was never done therefore making the bet null and void. He was perfectly fine with the bet but also asked that it be done the correct way which it wasn't.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14160 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:15 pm to
An offer was made and accepted. Approval by a 3rd party is irrelevant.

We probably need Litigator to give it a review and make a recommendation to admin.
This post was edited on 9/25/15 at 1:20 pm
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26172 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

From reading the stupididty of that thread in it's entirety it sounds like jacketfan asked the bet to be placed on the helpboard which sounds like was never done therefore making the bet null and void. He was perfectly fine with the bet but also asked that it be done the correct way which it wasn't.



Eh, he wanted the bet, he agreed to it. Make him own up to it.
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15649 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Eh, he wanted the bet, he agreed to it. Make him own up to it.


He also asked for terms to be met. I know when I bet with someone if terms are not met then any agreement upon the bet is no longer valid. He asked several times for the bet to be put to chicken and he would approve it but that was refused.

quote:

No, YOU have to go post it to the help board. It won't work otherwise. I know it's loud in the trailer, what with the window unit and mama's emphysema and all, but try to focus. Go post the bet on the help board so we can get on Chicken's permaban bet roll sheet this week
This post was edited on 9/25/15 at 1:27 pm
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
25656 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:27 pm to
Chicken or his admins have never enforced a ban bet that I can recall in the 7 years I've been on here. Stonehog still posts & he welched on a ban bet last fall...

Pretty sure Chickens position is that it's a question of honor on the posters part to honor a ban bet...

Feel free to correct me WG or anyone else, but I can't remember admins enforcing one....
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27294 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

therefore making the bet null and void


WTF are you talking.The bet was made and terms were agreed PERIOD

And just for good measure I agreed to it AGAIN on the day of bet.

She ask for a permaband and I said yes.
This post was edited on 9/25/15 at 1:30 pm
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15649 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

WTF are you talking.The bet was made and terms were agreed PERIOD


I'm talking about how he specifically asked for certain terms that you refused to do therefore no agreement was ever set in stone.

Also, DGD is not going to ban him nor is any other mod for a bet.
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15649 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Feel free to correct me WG or anyone else, but I can't remember admins enforcing one....


Not sure, the point still stands. He asked for certain terms and those terms weren't met. It's my understanding that if a party asks for terms and they are refused which they clearly were then we no longer have an agreement.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27294 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:33 pm to
That we go to the help board?I responded specifically to Deeprigs question and terms the day of the game.

Even if it wasn't the case I would've voluntarily band myself.

Are you an Administrator?
This post was edited on 9/25/15 at 1:36 pm
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15649 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Even if it wasn't the case I would voluntarily band myself.


He would have to self ban. No admin is going to do it.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27294 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:38 pm to
Once again,I agreed to deeprigs question (terms) later in the thread.

She'll just have to man up and ban herself.

I expect no less from a GT fan.
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46418 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Also, DGD is not going to ban him nor is any other mod for a bet.


Then ban him for being a Tech fan on a UGA board. I'm sure you can at least revoke GSB access which I think is plenty fair in this case.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14160 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 1:51 pm to
Those weren't terms of the bet IMO...that was a request to get it enforced by Chicken. The terms were each would accept a ban based on the outcome of the game...and those were agreed to - although RD did go back to 2 months vs permaban
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26172 posts
Posted on 9/25/15 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

He would have to self ban. No admin is going to do it.



Then he should self ban
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter