Started By
Message
re: Admin please remove Jacket Fan 77 from this board.
Posted on 9/25/15 at 2:46 pm to RD Dawg
Posted on 9/25/15 at 2:46 pm to RD Dawg
It was kind of an awkward set- up, but JacketFan was trying to be clever and get you to post the ban bet on the Help Board......to get you banned. Because that's what admins have done in past when people ask for their help with ban bets.
You've been had. Ha, ha.
You've been had. Ha, ha.
1
Posted on 9/25/15 at 2:49 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
You've been had. Ha, ha.
I think you are right. This dude was eating it up.
Posted on 9/25/15 at 2:50 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
We probably need Litigator to give it a review and make a recommendation to admin.
I remember them having that discussion and in that thread and that time I linked to Ice Cold's post relating to a ban bet made between Ocean and some other posters wherein Ice Cold said TD didn't enforce ban bets. So in light of that pronouncement, my view of it in the GSB thread was that it would be a scout's honor type of thing. LINK
So I would stick with what I said then that it is a scout's honor type of thing and that it would be against TD's stated policy to enforce it. It would be DGD's call of course as admin and he can decide who gets kicked off or placed in time out for whatever reason but I don't know that it can be for a reason inconsistent with what TD said was their policy. That would be getting on pretty shaky ground especially considering that people usually get banned from team boards for things like stirring the pot and making incendiary posts which are not proper on a team board. In those matters the admins pretty much have absolute discretion from what I've seen.
Just my 2 pennies on the matter.
Posted on 9/25/15 at 2:57 pm to Litigator
Would you concur that the bet did exist between Jacket and RD and that the request to post it on the help Board is not a relevant term or condition of the bet?
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:10 pm to SquatchDawg
In my country opinion, since the whole "put it on the help board" defense is inadmissible on TD, the challenge by RD & the -2.5 acceptance by the nerd should be binding at least on the Dawgrant since TD doesn't get involved with these & it's an honor thing. Seems like DGD's decision should be easy... 
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:19 pm to SquatchDawg
Now you're making my head spin on a Friday afternoon with the cocktail hour fast approaching.
You have a couple of legal issues as to whether a contract was formed with a lot of back and forth. I don't know that posting it on the Help Board was truly a condition precedent to formation of the contract--it sounded like a mere formality to me and maybe JacketFan was just trolling because to my knowledge the Help Board has never been used for that type of thing. And then RD comes back to try to change it from permaban to a two month ban which sounds like a counteroffer but JacketFan never agrees to that so was there even a contract formed?
Y'all brief it if you want to but I'll take the easy and clearest route and opine that assuming arguendo a contract was made it was void and unenforceable as violative of TD's public policy against recognition of permaban bets.
You have a couple of legal issues as to whether a contract was formed with a lot of back and forth. I don't know that posting it on the Help Board was truly a condition precedent to formation of the contract--it sounded like a mere formality to me and maybe JacketFan was just trolling because to my knowledge the Help Board has never been used for that type of thing. And then RD comes back to try to change it from permaban to a two month ban which sounds like a counteroffer but JacketFan never agrees to that so was there even a contract formed?
Y'all brief it if you want to but I'll take the easy and clearest route and opine that assuming arguendo a contract was made it was void and unenforceable as violative of TD's public policy against recognition of permaban bets.
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:27 pm to Litigator
quote:
Y'all brief it if you want to but I'll take the easy and clearest route and opine that assuming arguendo a contract was made it was void and unenforceable as violative of TD's public policy against recognition of permaban bets.
Come on Lit... This is a nerd we're talking about. No little bro clauses written in there anywhere?...FML...
This post was edited on 9/25/15 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:28 pm to Litigator
So, they have a contract but TD can't enforce it?
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:29 pm to Litigator
Wow...nice analysis.
Thanks for the input counselor. Have a great happy hour..
Thanks for the input counselor. Have a great happy hour..
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:30 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
That's how I read it. He's a lawyer so you'll never get a definitive answer.
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:35 pm to SquatchDawg
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:35 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
We had a freakin ban bet from the ND game and this bitch is not living up to the terms.
Who are you gonna take to your homecoming dance this year?
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:35 pm to dallasga6
quote:
Lit... This is a nerd we're talking about. No little bro clauses written in there
Screw you.
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:40 pm to Rules
... Where ya been? You been kinda scarce since the ND game... Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:46 pm to dallasga6
Like I said on page 1, revoke GSB access for 2 months. It's both fair and enforceable.
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:47 pm to dallasga6
No one is going to enforce anything, it's just a question of JacketFan owning up to what he said the terms were.
It'll be interesting to see what he opts for.
It'll be interesting to see what he opts for.
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:48 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Who you gonna take to the homecoming dance?
Hilarious,and so original .
Still upset because your dickriding pick didn't work and still not man enough to own up to it.
Don't know who's more pathetic.Jacket Fan or yourself.
Just can't let it go,can you?
This post was edited on 9/25/15 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:50 pm to Dawg in Beaumont
quote:
It'll be interesting to see what he opts for.
I think he'll be blown away that nobody could tell it was a joke to get rddawg to post on the help board..And he'll have lots of legit opportunities to rag UGA fans for being stupid.
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:51 pm to Dawg in Beaumont
quote:
Jacketfan owning up to what she said
Obviously the only way this will work out.
This post was edited on 9/25/15 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 9/25/15 at 3:52 pm to Jefferson Dawg
Yea, he was going for the help board trick no doubt. Just seems like the right thing to do to self bam for a while as a sign of some self awareness. He'd be back by COFH with a two month hiatus.
I fully recognize that I'm a dweeb for invoking questions of honor on a message board.
I fully recognize that I'm a dweeb for invoking questions of honor on a message board.
Page 2 of 4
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News