Started By
Message

re: Major changes coming in recruiting..

Posted on 1/11/17 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
3035 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

On one hand, the kid won't get Carter'd


Are you referring to Toneil Carter? If so, he's hardly the poster child for a recruit who gets dropped late. Chubb and Michel announced they were returning on 12/15, Carter decommitted on 12/19. That means as soon as an unexpected roster event took place, Georgia coaches informed him very quickly that he needed to look elsewhere. So he had plenty of time and good scholarship opportunities to choose from.

Plus, the third Wednesday in December was the 21st this year, so that rule (as specified in the OP) wouldn't have prevented him from getting "Carter'd" anyway, because Georgia pulled his offer before the presumptive early signing day. We just couldn't handle 7 tailbacks next year, needed depth elsewhere.

Not saying Smart is a saint, but there are plenty of coaches who've played a lot dirtier recruiting games than this example.
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 5:07 pm
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
85809 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

I guess that one is a split for the kid. On one hand, the kid won't get Carter'd. On the other hand, they may have to make a decision sooner than they'd like.



Patrick Miller would be a better example.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64014 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

I feel like the NCAA may be trying to think of ways to make some of the top talent spread out a little more and this is one of those secretive ways.


If they want to spread the talent around, make it a 70 scholarship cap instead of 85.

That's 3 deep at every position, plus four extras to play with.




Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64014 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

-No more back counting schollies


That's bullshite. If a kid enrolls in the middle of the academic year, that scholarship should be able to count for the current academic year if scholarship space is available at the time (back counting is actually current counting). Otherwise, the scholarship counts toward the following academic year when Fall Semester starts.

What exactly is wrong with this? What unfair advantage does this give big schools over little shitty poor schools?

Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64014 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

-Early signing day on 3rd Wednesday of December



I've looked at an early signing day from a couple of different angles, and I can't find an angle that makes the athlete come out ahead.

It boils down to this- Nick Saban likes an early signing day, so I'm against it.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51609 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

-No more back counting schollies


Wow, that's huge
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80155 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

-No more back counting schollies


I'm not sure how they can enforce this unless both signing periods in a calendar year count towards the same academic year.

The current rule is that you can only sign 25 players that will be on campus each academic year. Since the academic year goes from July - May, they would have to make substantial changes to change this.
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
24264 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:01 pm to
No back counting is a terrible idea. Players transfer because of playing time, family issues or they graduate and the university doesn't offer their advanced degree. Schools will not have an 85 man roster which hurts depth. I like the early signing period and like the 10th coach in the field. Early signing period protects kids and schools.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:24 pm to
Hmm. No back counting is the one that sticks out as a mistake. Didn't see it listed though here: LINK
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:24 pm to
In that link, the redshirt change would actually be better for the athlete at least.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40007 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:58 am to
Gotta love how he uses UGA as an example when we gave the kid over a month to find a school and there are numerous examples of kids losing their offer the day before NSD including his own precious Bama.
Posted by AUWDE
Member since Oct 2013
3187 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Not saying Smart is a saint, but there are plenty of coaches who've played a lot dirtier recruiting games than this example.




Paging Darius Philon...
Posted by Blanky6715
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2014
4377 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:32 am to
A decision has to be made regardless, just adjust.
Posted by Buddy2012
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
2861 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:35 am to
Is there a link to this ?
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Paging Darius Philon...


I was fine with that
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

-No more back counting schollies


Stupid

quote:

-10th on field coach is coming


Solid

quote:

-If recruiting a player from High School A, their HC cannot work any summer camps at your institution. Gone are the days of a coach packing up 5-10 players and taking them out of state for a summer camp, more than likely.


Stupid. They drive the kids to these camps.

quote:

-Early signing day on 3rd Wednesday of December


Solid.

quote:

-If you have recruited player A, a college cannot hire player A's coach until a 2 year window has closed.


This really fricks up the career path of a lot of coaches. That is some bullshite.

quote:

-July could become a dead period, eliminating many big time camps around the country.



I have no opinion. Maybe this will level playing field among programs with different levels of financial power?

Posted by lowspark12
nashville, tn
Member since Aug 2009
22368 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 2:39 pm to
I think it's BS they are going to try to dictate who some can/can't hire.
Posted by jumbo
Franklin
Member since Dec 2011
4598 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

I dont see how this could work. if you coach at a successful HS program with a lot of regular talent coming through the door, such as IMG academy or some other schools, you might never get an opportunity to coach at the college level.




You can't hire them for an off the field role for the 2 years before and 2 years after their anticipated enrollment and it extends to anyone "associated" with the prospect, not just their coach.

So if you are hiring them to actually be a coach, that is fine. But if you want to hire 5* QBs brother to work in the football office, you can't do that.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 2:50 pm
Posted by catnip
Member since Sep 2003
16341 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

The only one of those that makes any sense is the 10th on field coach


There should be a limit on practice time coaches or advisors. Some teams can't afford 30 or 40 coaches like Alabama.
Posted by catnip
Member since Sep 2003
16341 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

-If you have recruited player A, a college cannot hire player A's coach until a 2 year window has closed


What about a girl friend?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter