Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/24/15 at 9:44 am to Boomer00
Alabama fans are not like LSU fans. They do not knee kneejerkingly make irrational decisions when their coach loses a game or two a season
Posted on 11/24/15 at 9:46 am to DoUrden
quote:
You do realize it took OT for you to beat UT
You do realize OU beat TN by more points than Alabama right?
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 9:47 am
Posted on 11/24/15 at 9:47 am to Boomer00
Yes. I believe he'll be terminated shortly after losing to Big Game Bob by multiple TDs.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 9:50 am to Bama3714
I do hope we meet in the title game, These are the best two teams IMO, and best matchup.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 9:55 am to Boomer00
quote:
These are the best two teams IMO
You suddenly became a Clemson fan?
Posted on 11/24/15 at 9:57 am to Boomer00
quote:
You do realize OU beat TN by more points than Alabama right?
You realize that it didn't take Alabama two overtimes to beat them, right?
Posted on 11/24/15 at 9:57 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
You suddenly became a Clemson fan?
This is a thread about relevant programs and relevant fans. See yourself out aggie...your season has been over since October like always.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:09 am to Boomer00
quote:
OU has won just as many big games in the last 20 years
LOL wut
Oklahoma
2000 - W Orange Bowl (Title Game) vs FSU (Natl Champs)
2003 - L Sugar Bowl (Title Game) vs LSU
2004 - L Orange Bowl (Title Game) vs USC
2008 - L BCS Title Game vs Florida
Alabama
2009 - W Rose Bowl (Title Game) vs Texas (Natl Champs)
2011 - W BCS Title Game vs LSU (Natl Champs)
2012 - W BCS Title Game vs Notre Dame (Natl Champs)
2014 - L CFP Final Four vs Ohio STate
Yea, exactly the same
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 10:14 am
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:12 am to SummerOfGeorge
I constitute any BCS bowl/ national title a "Big game" OU has 2 less national titles but About the same BCS wins in that time frame. So to say a sugar bowl is OUs superbowl is just silly. However OU did beat the best team in the nation that year and everybody knew it. Alabama would have Skullfricked FSU or Auburn if they played auburn again.
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 10:15 am
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:14 am to Boomer00
quote:
I constitute any BCS bowl/ national title a "Big game" OU has 2 less national titles but About the same BCS wins in that time frame. So to say a sugar bowl is OUs superbowl is just silly.
We constitute national championship games/playoff games as big games (notice I didn't include SEC Championship games against Top 3 ranked opponents either, there were 3 of those since 2008).
I guess that is just the difference in our programs.
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 10:15 am
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:14 am to Boomer00
quote:
OU has won just as many big games in the last 20 years as bama
Really? Do any of those "big games" include a national championship?
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:16 am to SummerOfGeorge
And the BCS bowls were just as big as the playoff game Alabama got murdered in last year.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:17 am to Boomer00
quote:
Alabama would have Skullfricked FSU or Auburn if they played auburn again.
Our 2013 team would not have skullfricked FSU. Not even close. That FSU team was the best team in the country. We could have beaten them, but we would have had to have played extremely well.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:17 am to Boomer00
quote:
And the BCS bowls were just as big as the playoff game Alabama got murdered in last year.
No, they weren't. There was no path to a championship in either Sugar Bowl or the Capital One Bowl or any other non-title/playoff game.
Win the playoff game, with the next game, you are national champions.
That isn't even debatable. Get out of here.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:19 am to SummerOfGeorge
So pre 2014 when the number 3 and 4 team could play in a BCS bowl that's not the same as the number 3 and 4 team playing in a playoff game? Ok...
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 10:24 am
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:19 am to Boomer00
Boomer- I know what you are getting at, but trying to start shite with a Bama fan base that doesn't get excited about a non-Title Sugar Bowl is about as useful as a Diet Coke in Bert's hands. What does it accomplish really? As a Buckeye fan I was already told Bama wasn't jacked for the game last year because it was a play-in game to GET to the title. In other words, if they weren't chosen for it, they didn't care. Like how they are lambasting Auburn fans for not caring about the IB this week.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:20 am to Boomer00
quote:
So pre 2014 when the number 3 and 4 team played in a BCS bowl that's not the same as the number 3 and 4 team playing in a playoff game? Ok idiot...
I'm sorry, did the winner of #3 vs #4 get to then play for the national championship? No? Then no, it isn't even close to the same thing.
Playing for the chance to finish #3 is just as big a game as playing for the chance to win a national championship? Really? You are kidding, right?
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:20 am to Taurus 357
quote:
As a Buckeye fan I was already told Bama wasn't jacked for the game last year because it was a play-in game to GET to the title.
LOL wut? Who the fvck said that? I haven't read or heard that anywhere.
We were 100% excited for the CFP game vs Ohio State and Ohio State came out and played better and beat us. I'm not even using the "didn't care" excuse about the Oklahoma Sugar Bowl. I think we played poorly, but we lost and Oklahoma played great.
My argument is that it is idiotic to compare National Championship semifinals and title games to showcase bowl games where the winner has no shot to win a title.
This post was edited on 11/24/15 at 10:23 am
Posted on 11/24/15 at 10:22 am to SummerOfGeorge
Its still the same quality of game though man, regardless of the next game. You still have the same quality of teams playing eachother.
Page 2 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News