Started By
Message
Will Arky finish with a top 30 class...
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:40 pm
...according to Scout and Rivals?
7
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:41 pm to FTBLFN
No.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:42 pm to FTBLFN
yes
every SECW team will finish top 25.
LSU & Bama top 5
AU top 10
Ole Miss top 15-20
Arkansas 15-25
MSU 20-25
every SECW team will finish top 25.
LSU & Bama top 5
AU top 10
Ole Miss top 15-20
Arkansas 15-25
MSU 20-25
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:43 pm to FTBLFN
Yes, as well will every other SEC-W team.
This post was edited on 12/18/10 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:44 pm to FTBLFN
Pround of you FTBLFN, I feel partly responsible for this thread.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:45 pm to FTBLFN
Recruiting rankings don't mean much. It's all about player development when they make it on campus.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:45 pm to JonnyB
Don't flatter yourself, noob...you aren't in any way responsible.
I've taken grief on this forum from a lot of people better than you. Actually, everyone has been better at it than you.
I've taken grief on this forum from a lot of people better than you. Actually, everyone has been better at it than you.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:46 pm to gatordmb89
Look at the BCS Champs going back the last 10 years or so and get back with me.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:47 pm to gatordmb89
they do matter to a point. you need blue chip(4-5*) starters at the very least to compete in the SEC. you can't just field a team full of 2/3*s and expect to compete in the SEC.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:49 pm to NIH
quote:
they do matter to a point. you need blue chip(4-5*) starters at the very least to compete in the SEC. you can't just field a team full of 2/3*s and expect to compete in the SEC.
Chip Kelly disagrees.
Jim Harbaugh disagrees.
Dan Mullen disagrees.
Just to name a few.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:51 pm to gatordmb89
Dan Mullen has close to a dozen 4*s on his two deep right now, not a ton but enough to be competitive, and that number will be growing. Kelly probably has around that number as well, and like Mullen, that number will be growing.
Harbaugh's recruiting is picking up as well.
Harbaugh's recruiting is picking up as well.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:53 pm to gatordmb89
Read this is you are an non-believer
This post was edited on 12/18/10 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:55 pm to NIH
Go take a peak at UO's classes over the past few years, I think you will be surprised. Same with Stanford's and MSU's.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:55 pm to gatordmb89
quote:Which SEC teams do they coach?
Chip Kelly disagrees.
Jim Harbaugh disagrees.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:57 pm to gatordmb89
MSUs two classes under Mullen have been top heavy, like I said blue chip talent will be to start for him. Kelly as well.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 9:59 pm to WDE24
Yeah I kind of ignored that on accident. Oh well. 
Posted on 12/18/10 at 10:01 pm to FTBLFN
I'm a believer in having top talent. I was just pointing out that you don't always have to have the top talent to win games. Certain systems will allow you to take advantage of lesser talent. The SO that Mullen and Kelly run make it easier if you don't get the top 5 recruiting classes every year.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 10:02 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
Recruiting rankings don't mean much. It's all about player development when they make it on campus.
we saw on here long ago, some statistical analysis of rivals ratings and the actuals on the field.
There is a very high correlation between rivals and results. most years the #1 or #2 in rivals points is #1
now and then one that is not top two in rivals points sneaks in and wins the SEC W, but not often.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 10:09 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
Same with Stanford's and MSU's.
MSU finished fifth in their division this year. They are proof that you need top athletes to compete in the SEC.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 10:11 pm to inelishaitrust
Or what happens when you have a shaky QB and literally no WRs over the age of 20.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News