Started By
Message

re: Why doesn't the SEC consider renaming the divisions to North and South

Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:54 am to
Posted by Porky
Member since Aug 2008
19103 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:54 am to
quote:

are you certain Mizzou wanted the Big 10?

Yep. Y'all were in limbo and we saved ya.

This post was edited on 12/10/14 at 2:03 am
Posted by Rabern57
Alabama
Member since Jan 2010
13361 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 2:05 am to
It still wouldn't split the power in the conference. Plus if you put UF and Vandy where they realistically belonged the North would be the worst divisions in the nation.
This post was edited on 12/10/14 at 2:09 am
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53417 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 5:47 am to
quote:

You just want the North to defeat the South you piece of shite Yankee
that lineup isn't helping his cause, then.
Posted by CrimsonChin
the gutter.
Member since Feb 2010
5857 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 6:13 am to
I like it.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
7259 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

mizzoukills


North Division:

6) Ole Miss (to atone for past transgressions as well as to reflect northern proximity to the more southern Mississippi State)


South Division:

3) Miss State





SEC will NEVER split a state into seperate divisions.
This post was edited on 12/10/14 at 5:40 pm
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
7259 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Jagd Tiger
Why doesn't the SEC consider renaming the divisions to North and South

quote:
I've been advocating a rotating schedule.



another reason this works is it allows a 4 team conference playoff, getting rid of one bye week for adding the +1, and give the SECN an additional bonus of 2 more of the best marketable conference games, (this is the point were we say FU CBS, you ain't gettin none).




WTF with a 4 team playoff just to get the Conf. champion? People are already bitching about having conf. championship games with the new Playoff System.
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 6:59 pm to
Go draw some MS PAINT pictures...

Pit weiners in them. That's funny shite. This thread...meh.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42620 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 7:09 pm to
Because it would offend the entire SEC. If you want it renamed based on that, Upper South and Lower South is as good as you'd get. THAT is the appropriate distinction between us anyway.
Posted by TMRebel
Oxford, MS
Member since Feb 2013
5398 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:25 pm to
Well, we are TSUN. So this is justified.
Posted by NaturalStateReb
Arkansas
Member since Jun 2012
1443 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:26 pm to
Because it's the SOUTHeastern conference. Seriously, why did we let you people in?

We might as well have let Kansas in.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

We might as well have let Kansas in.



mutherfricker you just crossed the line
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter