Started By
Message
re: Why doesn't the SEC consider renaming the divisions to North and South
Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:52 pm to Tornado Alley
Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:52 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
1 - Kentucky
Wait they claim a national title?
quote:
1 - Texas A&M)
I thought they added 2 when they joined the SEC.
0
Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:55 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Why doesn't the SEC consider renaming the divisions to North and South
Because we already have East and West divisions. And we know Missouri wanted to be in the Big 10 and we don't do North stuff. That's why.
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 12/9/14 at 6:31 pm to Porky
are you certain Mizzou wanted the Big 10?
Posted on 12/9/14 at 6:38 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
The only reasonable solution to the constant conference expansion woes is as follows:
1) Missouri is kicked out of the SEC; they are not a match culturally and, unlike every other FBS conference, we are the only one who has a similar culture across the bord
2) Birmingham tells Columbia and Gainesville to hush and adds Clemson and Florida State as members
3) Birmingham pulls a major power play and adds Texas as conference member
4) The division are as follows:
East:
Clemson
Florida
Florida State
Georgia
Kentucky
South Carolina
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
West:
Alabama
Auburn
Arkansas
LSU
Ole Miss
Mississippi State
Texas
Texas A&M
Combined, the conference would have a cumulative 43 claimed national championships (1 - Clemson; 3 - Florida; 3 - Florida State; 2 - Georgia; 1 - Kentucky; 5 - Tennessee; 14 - Alabama; 1 - Arkansas; 2 - Auburn; 3 - LSU; 3 - Ole Miss; 4 - Texas; 1 - Texas A&M)
Upvote, I like it.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 6:43 pm to mizzoukills
Ole Miss could actually make it to ATL with those divisions.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 6:46 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 12/9/14 at 6:53 pm to reggierayreb
quote:.....
Ole Miss could actually make it to ATL with those divisions.
Yea..on a bus maybe to watch somebody else to play for the SEC championship...face it..the best team Ole Miss has fielded since Eli was QB and you still fell short
Posted on 12/9/14 at 7:02 pm to mizzoukills
Bc the north would suck even more than the east did
Posted on 12/9/14 at 7:16 pm to Smalls
quote:
I've been in favor of annually realigning divisions based on the previous season's records. It makes sense. Leaving divisions as is without regard to performance is actually quite antiquated. True, you never know for sure how a team will perform the next season, but realigning the divisions makes just as much sense as leaving them the same, IMO.
I've been advocating a rotating schedule. if the rivalry games have to be played every year you could still work the schedule around those games.
Would basically end OOC and you could still take the best two teams for a championship if needed.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 7:37 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
North Division:
5) South Carolina
You put the original Dixieland in the North?
As for the stupid discussion about super conferences... you guys know it existed once? The SoCon had damn near every member of what is now the SEC and the ACC combined so you can go ahead and drop that idea.
You can also talk about all the history you want but the reason Mizzou and A&M were brought in were for new markets so when the money got split 14 ways we all still go more. Bring in a Clemson and that split is lessened for each.
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 12/9/14 at 7:46 pm to mizzoukills
this is right up there with Legends and Leaders
Posted on 12/9/14 at 8:02 pm to mizzoukills
This is really smart... Do you have a new movie coming out... Dumb and Dumber and Completely Stupid???
Posted on 12/9/14 at 8:22 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 12/9/14 at 9:27 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
mizzoukills
The very fact you would ask such a stupid question clearly indicates why you don't belong in the SEC. That is worse than the all boy cheerleading squad (not by much) at aTm.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 9:35 pm to mizzoukills
Florida instead of Georgia like it should be and we got a deal.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 10:03 pm to Tornado Alley
I love this. I know some SC folks may not want clemson, but damn this would be one bad arse conference. Even more than it already is.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 10:03 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
quote:
North and South
actually we'll callem the south and the far south, as I already suggested.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 10:09 pm to JoeMoTiger
quote:
I've been advocating a rotating schedule.
another reason this works is it allows a 4 team conference playoff, getting rid of one bye week for adding the +1, and give the SECN an additional bonus of 2 more of the best marketable conference games, (this is the point were we say FU CBS, you ain't gettin none).
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 11:21 pm
Posted on 12/9/14 at 11:52 pm to mizzoukills
This thread has so much dumbass in it I don't even know where to start.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News