Started By
Message
re: Whose the best RB of the last 5 years?
Posted on 1/19/14 at 5:40 am to CrimsonChin
Posted on 1/19/14 at 5:40 am to CrimsonChin
Latti.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 6:42 am to mrbroker
quote:
not that I have a list but you gave the Heisman trophy a 10?
Funny that you think this is a legit argument. I've seen years in which the Heisman winner wasn't in the top ten at his position (Miami QBs)
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:54 am to Penrod
Lattimore was scary good.
Gurley is the same type of back.
I'd say it was a toss up of these 2.
Gurley is the same type of back.
I'd say it was a toss up of these 2.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:02 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
Lattimore.
And Gurley is an exceptional back, as well. My #2.
I really liked Michael Dyer and Knile Davis. Probably round out my top 5 w/ a Bama back or Stevan Ridley.
Underrated: Zac Stacy
And Gurley is an exceptional back, as well. My #2.
I really liked Michael Dyer and Knile Davis. Probably round out my top 5 w/ a Bama back or Stevan Ridley.
Underrated: Zac Stacy
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:16 pm to WheelRoute
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:39 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
Lattimore was really good, but he wasn't very explosive. More of a power back, which isn't a bad thing really. Richardson ran behind one of the best offensive lines in history, and often got to the second level before much contact was made. I'd probably go with Gurley.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 1:51 pm to thatdude1985
quote:
OH AND NICE "SECOND" USAGE...I called that when I posted this that someone would say that. It was you....nice. What was that thing that was recently posted about Auburn and a 2nd something?? Is that the 2nd you're looking for...I mean it's a version of "second" or "2nd" or some shite. 2nd......2nd....2nd.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 3:09 pm to CrimsonChin
This was Gurley's first year (TRUE FRESHMAN)
1385 yards, 17 TDs
117 yards
Total 1502 yards, 17 TDs
In 10 games in Gurley's second year, he had
989 yards, 10 TDs
441 yards, 6 TDs
Total 1440 yards, 16 TDs
This was Lattimore's first year (TRUE FRESHMAN)
1197 yards, 17 TDs
412 yards, 2 TDs
Total 1609 yards, 19 TDs
In 7 games in Lattimore's second year, he had
818 yards, 10 TDs
181 yards 1 TD
Total 1000 yards, 11 TDs
Take in just their two starting years where both were injured at least more than three games, they dominated the stat sheet. Looking at what type of runner they were, they pushed people. Also, Trent Richardson falls into this category as well. While he didn't get the starting job off the bat, he was great in relief and dominated his first starting year. Lacy also dominated in this way and actually did more with less compared to the others.
Best is hard but I have those top two as even, then Richardson, Lacy, and finally Mason and Hill are right below because of sample size. Gurley can beat them all out with a dominate performance next year though.
1385 yards, 17 TDs
117 yards
Total 1502 yards, 17 TDs
In 10 games in Gurley's second year, he had
989 yards, 10 TDs
441 yards, 6 TDs
Total 1440 yards, 16 TDs
This was Lattimore's first year (TRUE FRESHMAN)
1197 yards, 17 TDs
412 yards, 2 TDs
Total 1609 yards, 19 TDs
In 7 games in Lattimore's second year, he had
818 yards, 10 TDs
181 yards 1 TD
Total 1000 yards, 11 TDs
Take in just their two starting years where both were injured at least more than three games, they dominated the stat sheet. Looking at what type of runner they were, they pushed people. Also, Trent Richardson falls into this category as well. While he didn't get the starting job off the bat, he was great in relief and dominated his first starting year. Lacy also dominated in this way and actually did more with less compared to the others.
Best is hard but I have those top two as even, then Richardson, Lacy, and finally Mason and Hill are right below because of sample size. Gurley can beat them all out with a dominate performance next year though.
This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 1/19/14 at 3:20 pm to CrimsonChin
I understand everyone likes Lattimore, he's an awesome guy. But no way is he the best. This board tends to overrate him.
ETA: I also think Dyer was overrated.
ETA: I also think Dyer was overrated.
This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 1/19/14 at 3:53 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
I understand everyone likes Lattimore, he's an awesome guy. But no way is he the best. This board tends to overrate him.
no. He played behind bad olines and still put up great stats.
Go back and watch some of his games. Hes often hit at or behind the line of scrimmage and still manages to turn it into a positive gain. 2010 Lattimore highlights
The 2010 UGA game particularly displays his ability to do this. Every Lattimore carry vs. UGA 2010
Posted on 1/19/14 at 5:19 pm to CrimsonChin
I wouldn't trade Jeremy hill for any other back listed in these threads.
Durable, strong, explosive, consistent, versatile.
Ppl would think more positively about his play w/o the off the field issues.
Durable, strong, explosive, consistent, versatile.
Ppl would think more positively about his play w/o the off the field issues.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 6:25 pm to parkjas2001
at the AU fans saying mason, too bad your the only ones, he isn't even top 3
Posted on 1/19/14 at 6:55 pm to TigerBait2008
Best? Lattimore, no doubt. Gurley would probably be #2. And Ingram, really? Anthony Dixon was better, and he played with a much, much worse offensive line. I'm not saying he should win by any means, but he is a lot more deserving than a ton of the backs mentioned here.
Posted on 1/19/14 at 7:11 pm to Paul Allen
Ben Tate.
At least in his mind . . .
At least in his mind . . .
Posted on 1/19/14 at 7:14 pm to Paul Allen
quote:
Isaiah Crowell
Had great speed but struggled with vision. If he got outside it was a wrap. I really enjoyed his 1 year. Probably would have been really good. :(
Posted on 1/19/14 at 7:14 pm to TigerBait2008
quote:And you go around calling posters idiots?
at the AU fans saying mason, too bad your the only ones, he isn't even top 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News