Started By
Message
re: Who goes first in the NFL draft? (QBs)
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:22 am to adammwilson
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:22 am to adammwilson
Still waiting to hear what Mallett's 'off the field' issues are?
His arrogance? His confusion as to the color of his skin? Where's the list and how does his differ from 99.9% of others not named Tim Tebow?
Oh, I remember now. He got a public intox charge walking between bars 18 months ago.
His arrogance? His confusion as to the color of his skin? Where's the list and how does his differ from 99.9% of others not named Tim Tebow?
Oh, I remember now. He got a public intox charge walking between bars 18 months ago.
2
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:24 am to woopiginaustin
quote:
Still waiting to hear what Mallett's 'off the field' issues are?
perception of him is that he is a douche and that won't go well in the nfl. (see VY)
Other than that right now I have no idea but it WILL come out and we will ALL know.
quote:
how does his differ from 99.9% of others not named Tim Tebow?
it differs completely there is a huge difference between confidence and being a prick.
if you look on message boards (I know it doesn't necessarily mean alot) but on them many man people know Mallett is a douche. They seem to know his Michigan teammates HATED him.
This post was edited on 11/26/10 at 11:27 am
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:25 am to musick
quote:
First QB Taken?
Locker
Nice one McShay
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:26 am to adammwilson
I don't think him thinking he's black or being cocky has affected his performance and there are no reports that his team has a problem with him.
He has no off the field issues. None.
He has no off the field issues. None.
This post was edited on 11/26/10 at 11:28 am
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:27 am to MagillaGuerilla
did he have Luck declaring or not?
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:28 am to woopiginaustin
I don't understand why Mallet wouldn't be a good pro quarterback. He done pretty well in a pro style system. 
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:30 am to woopiginaustin
quote:
I don't think him thinking he's black or being cocky has affected his performance
it ain't all about performance all the time. 95% of it is but that other 5%...
quote:
there are no reports that his team has a problem with him.
well at Michigan they did.
I can't wait until he interviews like shite and it is revealed that he is bad in the classroom and we find out some things that have been kept under wraps brought to the light.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:31 am to adammwilson
quote:
adammwilson
quote:
NFL Draft
quote:
tough choice and not one I can answer right now
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:32 am to adammwilson
quote:
I can't wait until he interviews like shite and it is revealed that he is bad in the classroom and we find out some things that have been kept under wraps brought to the light.
Come on, man. You're a solid poster around here.
Don't you think you're reaching here? I don't think Mallett is Tebow. But there's nothing hidden that will knock him out of the first 5-10 taken in the draft.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:33 am to woopiginaustin
quote:
You're a solid poster around here.
as are you.
quote:
Don't you think you're reaching here?
possibly.
quote:
there's nothing hidden that will knock him out of the first 5-10 taken in the draft.
I don't think he will go that high regardless of how he interviews. I don't think there is anything really bad hidden but I do think the perception some have of him may hurt him. But we will just have to wait and see.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:33 am to adammwilson
quote:
did he have Luck declaring or not?
I'll have to check.
He did have Locker over Bradford last year though...
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:35 am to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
He did have Locker over Bradford last year though...
that's insane and I'm a huge fan of Locker but COME ON.This post was edited on 11/26/10 at 11:36 am
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:42 am to adammwilson
Don't get me wrong, I had doubts about Bradford, but not enough to say Locker is a better pro prospect at that point.
Locker is a good athlete that has potential to be a starting NFL QB, but is a few years away from that happening...
Locker is a good athlete that has potential to be a starting NFL QB, but is a few years away from that happening...
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:44 am to adammwilson
Only people who have never seen Luct play would ask this question. Quintessential NFL QB. Think Matt Ryan but with more leadership and collegiate success.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:48 am to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
Locker is a good athlete that has potential to be a starting NFL QB, but is a few years away from that happening...
agreed, I do think he could surprise and be good in a short while. it is all up to him and his work ethic.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:51 am to adammwilson
Playa' A:
*2,746 yards (8.6 per attempt) at 70.2% for 24 TD's and 7 Int's; 163.0 QB rating
*445 rushing yards at 9.1 per attempt for 3 TD's
*Strength of schedule --- #65
3,191 yards and 27 total TD's
Playa' B:
*1,746 yards (6.5 per attempt) at 55.4% for 14 TD's and 7 INT's; 122.4 QB rating
*262 rushing yards at 3.3 per attempt for 4 TD's
*Strength of schedule --- #29
2,008 yards and 18 total TD's
Playa' C:
*3,272 passing yards (9.6 per attempt) at 67.2% for 27 TD's and 9 Int's; 168.6 QB Rating
*-31 rushing yards at -0.9 per attempt for 4 TD's
*Strength of schedule --- #6
3,241 yards and 31 total TD's
*2,746 yards (8.6 per attempt) at 70.2% for 24 TD's and 7 Int's; 163.0 QB rating
*445 rushing yards at 9.1 per attempt for 3 TD's
*Strength of schedule --- #65
3,191 yards and 27 total TD's
Playa' B:
*1,746 yards (6.5 per attempt) at 55.4% for 14 TD's and 7 INT's; 122.4 QB rating
*262 rushing yards at 3.3 per attempt for 4 TD's
*Strength of schedule --- #29
2,008 yards and 18 total TD's
Playa' C:
*3,272 passing yards (9.6 per attempt) at 67.2% for 27 TD's and 9 Int's; 168.6 QB Rating
*-31 rushing yards at -0.9 per attempt for 4 TD's
*Strength of schedule --- #6
3,241 yards and 31 total TD's
This post was edited on 11/26/10 at 11:53 am
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:52 am to woopiginaustin
stats are deceiving. They also don't show intangibles.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:54 am to adammwilson
Stats are deceiving but not deceiving as they would be absent a strength of schedule metric. How many more yards would Mallett have in the Pac-10? 1,000?
As far as intangibles, I don't hear anyone saying Mallett lacks them.
The biggest complaint about Mallett is "He thinks he's black".
As far as intangibles, I don't hear anyone saying Mallett lacks them.
The biggest complaint about Mallett is "He thinks he's black".
This post was edited on 11/26/10 at 11:56 am
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:56 am to woopiginaustin
quote:
strength of schedule metric.
meh still doesn't tell the whole story because I think you also have to take into account how talented the player's teammates are around him.
quote:
As far as intangibles, I don't hear anyone saying Mallett lacks them.
yet. Idk we will see. It's kind of pointless for me to tell you he lacks them when right now we have no idea.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 11:57 am to adammwilson
Lets ask hawgalude what he thinks
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News