Started By
Message
Which would you prefer?
Posted on 2/27/12 at 6:28 am
Posted on 2/27/12 at 6:28 am
A playmaker athlete at qb? (Vick, RG3) or prototypical qb? (Luck, Wilson, Murray)
7
Posted on 2/27/12 at 6:31 am to bigeztiger
Prototypical QB, although hopefully with some running ability (like a 4.7 or 4.8) to take some easy yards if they're given and to escape the pass rushers. It was painful watching Mallett try to scramble with his cement clown shoes.
This post was edited on 2/27/12 at 6:32 am
Posted on 2/27/12 at 6:36 am to Hog on the Hill
Prototypical,with a great pocket presence. Seems they win more Championships
Posted on 2/27/12 at 6:43 am to bigeztiger
quote:
A playmaker athlete at qb? (Vick, RG3) or prototypical qb? (Luck, Wilson, Murray)
LOL @ putting RGIII in the same class as Vick and Murray and Wilson in the same class as Luck.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 7:50 am to 1991UW
Just examples
Posted on 2/27/12 at 7:52 am to 1991UW
quote:
LOL @ UW
I prefer prototypical
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:13 am to 1991UW
quote:
1991UW
You're one of the worst posters on the board.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:23 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
In recent years, athletic qbs win NCs as much as prototypical it seems.
"Spread offense" vs pro style is the better question, because the qb will be based on that.
I don't really mind the spread, but I freaking hate my team having the hurry-up-no-huddle bullshite.
"Spread offense" vs pro style is the better question, because the qb will be based on that.
I don't really mind the spread, but I freaking hate my team having the hurry-up-no-huddle bullshite.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:27 am to bigeztiger
quote:
A playmaker athlete at qb? (Vick, RG3) or prototypical qb? (Luck, Wilson, Murray)
Some of y'all are so obvious.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:28 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You're one of the worst posters on the board.
While I agree with you that he is, I also agree with his post. RG3 is no vick yet, and wilson and murray are no Luck.
Although I really am surprised he didnt bring up Locker.
This post was edited on 2/27/12 at 8:29 am
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:30 am to ThaKaptin
quote:
While I agree with you that he is, I also agree with his post. RG3 is no vick yet, and wilson and murray are no Luck.
Although I really am surprised he didnt bring up Locker.
Yep, because Locker has sucked in the NFL with his 99.4 QB Rating.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:30 am to beatbammer
Well and RGIII seems to be in there because of his skin tone. Not calling the OP a racist, but he is more of prototypical QB than a running QB
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:34 am to bigeztiger
Vick and RG3 are different. Rg3 is just as much of a pocket passer as most qbs. He can just run too. And luck is Petyton manning running a 4.6. Shiiiiiiiiiiiiit. In the pros, I would want Luck.
This post was edited on 2/27/12 at 8:36 am
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:38 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You're one of the worst posters on the board.
Fatphil has him beat right now.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:38 am to 1991UW
quote:
Yep, because Locker has sucked in the NFL with his 99.4 QB Rating.
I dont believe I said anything negative at all about Jake Locker in my post. Why so defensive?
FWIW, I thought he was, and is, a really good QB. And I am counting on your former offensive coordinator, currently OUR new offensive coordinator, to develop QB's in Tuscaloosa like he did Jake up there.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:42 am to ThaKaptin
Well, given our recent history with running QB's...Give me the prototype...all day everyday.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:45 am to ThaKaptin
quote:
RG3 is no vick yet, and wilson and murray are no Luck.
It was obvious the OP was not comparing their accomplishments, but style of play. Although RGIII is more of a pocket passer then given credit for. The kid can make all the throws Luck can, and has more ability to extend the play.
The problem isn't he disagrees with posts. He only responds in a flaming manner. UW is just terrible.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:46 am to ThaKaptin
quote:
FWIW, I thought he was, and is, a really good QB. And I am counting on your former offensive coordinator, currently OUR new offensive coordinator, to develop QB's in Tuscaloosa like he did Jake up there.
He was good but most of the credit still goes to Sark... who actually calls the plays.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:47 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
UW is just terrible.
Not as terrible as Auburn before they started paying $200,000 for recruits.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:47 am to bigeztiger
Pro-style offense with a drop back passer.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News