Started By
Message
2
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:09 am to beaver
quote:
teams always get better in their second year of a new HC
Gonna be hard for Aky to get any worse.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:09 am to beaver
quote:
beaver
quote:
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:09 am to adammwilson
quote:
Florida's offense couldn't be any worse.
Yeah well I've been saying that since Meyer's last year.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:12 am to parkjas2001
quote:
I see a few more.
Which ones?
Sept. 18, 2014 at Kansas State 48/52
Oct. 4, 2014 LSU 50/50
Oct. 11, 2014 at Miss. State 50/50
Oct. 25, 2014 South Carolina 50/50
Nov. 1, 2014 at Ole Miss 50/50
Nov. 8, 2014 Texas A&M 55/45
Nov. 15, 2014 at Georgia 40/60
Nov. 29, 2014 at Alabama 30/70
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:13 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
TAMU - Worse
The loss of JFF and Evans will be offset by an improved defense. We had absolutely NO pass rush last year. That will change with the addition of Henderson and Garrett and the continued development of Golden. Worst-case scenario is SAME, but I think that we improve slightly. Of course, that could be completely offset by a harder schedule.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:13 am to VFL1800FPD
quote:
Marlin Lane got over 500 yds as a backup and avg 5.3/rush. Not great, but not unproven.
Yeah I meant the freshman. I'm sorry if that wasn't clear.
quote:
True, but Marquez North, Pig (if he returns), Von Pearson (#1 JUCO WR), and Josh Malone (#1 TN WR, #5 in nation) will be the most raw talent out of any WR corps in the SEC this year.
I still think Bama has you guys beat.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:13 am to Won3ofTheLast5
quote:hah, okay champ
Typo, should have been 60/40
quote:Do you even watch football?
TAMU didn't get better last year from 2012. Teams adjusted to their style of play.
In scoring offense, they were almost identical from 2012 (44.2 vs 44.5 ppg). Near the same in total offense as well (-20 ypg from 2012).
Do you understand how a team sport works? The offense can still be good, and the team worse, if the defense blows. They lost over half their starters on D from 2012 to 2013.
ETA: "Adjusting to their style of play" must mean run it down their porous defense.
This post was edited on 3/11/14 at 10:18 am
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:16 am to adammwilson
quote:
I still think Bama has you guys beat.
Alright, forgot about Bama, but i'd still say we deserve a spot in the top 3, easy
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:17 am to madmaxvol
quote:
Worley had a couple of pretty good games strung together before his injury last year.
WHen? Let's not count Austin Peay.
quote:They didn't even really show flashes of being good. I get your point though.
the two QBs who saw significant time last year should be better prepared to perform on Saturday.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:19 am to VFL1800FPD
quote:
i'd still say we deserve a spot in the top 3, easy
In terms of potential yes. In terms of predictions no. In terms of production no.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:19 am to Tantal
quote:
The loss of JFF and Evans will be offset by an improved defense.
Really? Losing the greatest play-maker in the history of your school (and at least one other first rounder from your offense) is going to be off-set because your historically bad defense is going to suck slightly less?
You sound like the Tennessee fans who think they will be much improved while replacing their entire offensive line. Got to love the off season when optimism is high and realistic views of one's own team are nowhere to be found.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:19 am to adammwilson
quote:
WHen? Let's not count Austin Peay
Worley beat #4 USCe
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:20 am to adammwilson
quote:
In terms of potential yes. In terms of predictions no. In terms of production no.
I meant in terms of potential/raw talent
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:21 am to Won3ofTheLast5
quote:
TAMU - Same
I don't see how they can't be worse. They lose their Heisman winner, best OL and best receiver
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:26 am to Tantal
quote:
The loss of JFF and Evans will be offset by an improved defense. We had absolutely NO pass rush last year. That will change with the addition of Henderson and Garrett and the continued development of Golden. Worst-case scenario is SAME, but I think that we improve slightly. Of course, that could be completely offset by a harder schedule.
The hilarious part is that you actually believe this
Newsflash: it takes more than a pass rush to make a bad defense even decent. Arky had one of the best front 4 in the SEC last year and where did that get us? Keep dreaming Aggy
This post was edited on 3/11/14 at 10:28 am
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:27 am to The_Joker
quote:
I don't see how they can't be worse. They lose their Heisman winner, best OL and best receiver
The offense may not be quite as good, but we're absolutely LOADED at receiver, so the loss of Evans isn't as big a deal as you'd think. I trust Sumlin to develop Hill or Allen to the point of being very competitive, even if they aren't quite JFF.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:29 am to Won3ofTheLast5
EAST
Florida - Better
Georgia - Better
USC - Worse
UT - Better
UK - Better
Mizzou - Worse
Vandy - Worse
WEST
Alabama - Same
Arkansas - Better
LSU - Same
MSU - Better
OM - Worse
TAMU - Same
AU - Same
Florida - Better
Georgia - Better
USC - Worse
UT - Better
UK - Better
Mizzou - Worse
Vandy - Worse
WEST
Alabama - Same
Arkansas - Better
LSU - Same
MSU - Better
OM - Worse
TAMU - Same
AU - Same
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:30 am to The_Joker
quote:
Newsflash: it takes more than a pass rush to make a bad defense even decent.
Unless you are the NY Giants during the 2007 and 2011 playoffs.
Posted on 3/11/14 at 10:32 am to Meno's Paradox
quote:
Really? Losing the greatest play-maker in the history of your school
Anyone can put up numbers in Sumlin's scheme.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News