Started By
Message
re: Where do you stand on SEC Realignment?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:48 pm to pvilleguru
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:48 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
I would go back to ten teams, play everyone, and not have a championship game.
+1 for me. Have a strong SWC, a strong and smaller ACC, about 15 bowl games max (maybe 20), be done with it New Years Day.
0
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:48 pm to Libertyabides71
quote:
No more schools that don't care about football. Arkansas Missouri Kentucky South Carolina just dilute the football in the conference.
I agree with this with the exception of Arkansas. I think they care more than the others. They have tradition in football. They just got screwed by Patrino. Off all the schools you named, I think they are the only team willing to fire a coach if they aren't successful within a reasonable time.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:49 pm to DamnStrong1860
Kick out Kentucky, Missouri, and Mississippi State.
Add North Carolina, Virginia, Oklahoma, Texas, and Duke.
Add North Carolina, Virginia, Oklahoma, Texas, and Duke.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:49 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
I would go back to ten teams, play everyone, and not have a championship game.
Arkansas and South Carolina really haven't added a damn thing to SEC football. Both have them combined for zero national championships, zero conference championships and zero major BCS bowl wins after being added to the SEC. They also haven't had many great out-of-conference wins that has helped out the SEC cause either. Out of the four SEC additions since 1992, Texas A&M is the only school out of the bunch with the potential to become a national power. The SEC could have stuck with ten schools and it wouldn't have affected the football one bit. In fact, it probably would have been enhanced with fewer mediocre football schools dragging down the rest of the conference.
This post was edited on 10/19/13 at 12:35 am
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:49 pm to The7Sins
quote:
Kick out Kentucky, Arkansas, and Mississippi State.
This post was edited on 10/18/13 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:52 pm to Bench McElroy
I would kick out
Bama
Auburn
Ole Miss
Miss St
Tenn
Vandy
Kentucky
Georgia
Florida
LSU
Bama
Auburn
Ole Miss
Miss St
Tenn
Vandy
Kentucky
Georgia
Florida
LSU
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:53 pm to JesusQuintana
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:53 pm to DamnStrong1860
Obviously football gets all the pub. But theres more than one sport. Give me some more basketball schools. I'd love to see UNC added. They'd bring strong basketball and baseball programs.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:55 pm to Libertyabides71
quote:
No more schools that don't care about football. Arkansas Missouri Kentucky South Carolina just dilute the football in the conference.
Warning -- thread hijack....
That Kentucky fan having a conversation w himself for 10 pages in his own hoops thread today was odd.
More power to him & all of the bball fans out there; I just can't relate.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:56 pm to JesusQuintana
So you want to join the Independents
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:58 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
I would go back to ten teams, play everyone, and not have a championship game.
What if we kept 14 and did away with the Championship game? That might lead to Co-Champions every year and result in two SEC teams in the playoffs.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:04 pm to DamnStrong1860
quote:
What if we kept 14 and did away with the Championship game? That might lead to Co-Champions every year and result in two SEC teams in the playoffs.
14 teams works if you go to a 6-3 format. in a 6-1-1 or a 6-2-1 its too many teams. Anything over 14 is impossible
Imagine having 16 teams at a 7-1-1 format
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:07 pm to DamnStrong1860
Give me two teams out west and move Auburn and Alabama to the east and that keeps all rivalries in tact but we need two good teams to the west or the west just becomes the. LSU show. At least there is parity in the divisions as they stand now.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:12 pm to DamnStrong1860
I believe this thread is just an attempt to encourage pushing Vandy out of the conference. Don't you realize the SEC needs at least one school with academic credibility?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:13 pm to labamafan
Add FSU and Clemson (this will never happen). Realign the Conference. Clemson Goes East with Auburn. FSU or Florida goes West with Mizzou.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:15 pm to WalternateWillie
I'm an Ag, so my opinion doesn't count; but I think Vanderbilt is great for the conference.
That said, Vandy isn't the only SEC school w academic credibility.
That said, Vandy isn't the only SEC school w academic credibility.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:15 pm to WalternateWillie
We don't need you for that any longer. We only keep you around for your hot chicks, oh wait...nevermind.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:15 pm to Cockopotamus
If we get to 16 then we need 3 divisions.
West A&M, LSU, ARK, MU
East UF, UGA, USC, UNC
Central UA, AU, MSU, OM
North UK, UT, V, VT
I think a 4-2-2 would work right?
West A&M, LSU, ARK, MU
East UF, UGA, USC, UNC
Central UA, AU, MSU, OM
North UK, UT, V, VT
I think a 4-2-2 would work right?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:20 pm to DamnStrong1860
Legends Division:
LSU
Florida
Georgia
South Carolina
Texas A&M
Auburn
Tennessee
Leaders Division:
Alabama
Missouri
Kentucky
Vandy
Ole Miss
Mississippi State
Arkansas
LSU
Florida
Georgia
South Carolina
Texas A&M
Auburn
Tennessee
Leaders Division:
Alabama
Missouri
Kentucky
Vandy
Ole Miss
Mississippi State
Arkansas
Posted on 10/18/13 at 11:21 pm to roadGator
quote:
We don't need you for that any longer. We only keep you around for your hot chicks, oh wait...nevermind.
Honestly meant no disrespect. I know that UF and A&M have real academic tradition. It's just frustrating that no one recognizes Vandy's value. We've got a great baseball team and football is on the rise. We are not Tulane!
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News