Started By
Message
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:18 pm to Fake news man
quote:
Hasn't happen since Penn State
Or even play in a neutral site away from a SEC state
USC from 2016 says hello?
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:21 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
his is incorrect, not sure where you guys are getting this from. Guessing the MSU cancellation info.
My assumption is that most would look at it over a 2 year period where you are looking at 1 year. I have no idea if your numbers from the previous post are correct but assuming they are:
H-H
Year 1 = $10M
Year 2 (return trip) = $0
NS
Year 1 = $6.5M
Year 2 = $6.5M
$3M more in the NS over H-H.
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:22 pm to tomsellecksmustache
Texas is not a SEC state
Never was and never will be
Never was and never will be
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:24 pm to BamaAlum02
What is the percentage of the split at these neutral site games
You're assuming as well that the stadium itself doesn't get their hands into the money
So out of let's say 13 million again how much goes to the stadium
You're assuming as well that the stadium itself doesn't get their hands into the money
So out of let's say 13 million again how much goes to the stadium
This post was edited on 3/31/17 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:25 pm to Fake news man
quote:
Why don't you play a home and home against another blue blood
Why did you sign up just to make this thread?
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:28 pm to Fake news man
Why do you care? Open up with a top 3 opponent in Atlanta. What we have been doing works for us so why fix something that isn't broke. Where is your team opening up this year?
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:29 pm to Kings of Carolinas
There are guaranteed payouts to each team.
Alabama received $6.5 million against USC last year.
Alabama received $6.5 million against USC last year.
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:30 pm to Kings of Carolinas
quote:
What is the percentage of the split at these neutral site games
You're assuming as well that the stadium itself doesn't get their hands into the money
So out of let's say 13 million again how much goes to the stadium
Not sure as those were not my numbers. I would assume that is Alabama's cut from the total. Those NS games are generating way more than $6.5M.
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:33 pm to Fake news man
quote:
My university attempted to play Bama in a home and home but Bama said no
They didn't even want to play us in Arlington
You can't really blame us. Saban doesn't like baseball, and if we ever did play the Astros, we'd make them play us in Hoover so we could get all the calls just like we do in the SEC tournament.
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:35 pm to BamaAlum02
T-town News article
According to the linked article, It's not even close.
Looking at the 2 year average for each game:
Wisc H-H: $4M + $0 = $2M/year
Wisc NS: $4m/year
USC H-H: $4M + $0 = $2M/year
USC NS: $6.5M/year
FSU H-H: $4M + $0 = $2M/year
FSU NS: $5M/year
$6M average for H-H games over 3 years versus $15.5M for NS.
quote:
But there's an economic reality element that is too hard to ignore. Consider this: Alabama will reportedly make a combined $15.5 million for its three neutral-site games from 2015-17 (Wisconsin $4 million, Southern Cal $6.5, Florida State $5 million).
If Alabama went with a home-and-home series instead, it would profit at most about $4 million for the one home game, and then, when it went on the road to fulfill the contractual obligation, it would make nothing.
According to the linked article, It's not even close.
Looking at the 2 year average for each game:
Wisc H-H: $4M + $0 = $2M/year
Wisc NS: $4m/year
USC H-H: $4M + $0 = $2M/year
USC NS: $6.5M/year
FSU H-H: $4M + $0 = $2M/year
FSU NS: $5M/year
$6M average for H-H games over 3 years versus $15.5M for NS.
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:38 pm to Fake news man
What trophy do they hand out for top ten finishes
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:44 pm to Cromulent
quote:
With a SOS that is laughable
Posted on 3/31/17 at 1:52 pm to Fake news man
quote:
There is a chance you can lose Why don't you play a home and home against another blue blood
I don't know. Why do you frick sheep and name them priscilla?
Posted on 3/31/17 at 2:03 pm to Fake news man
I'm not sure it matters all that much. I know some years ago they opened the season against UCLA in Pasadena and won big.
It would be interesting though to see how Bama would do at Columbus in a night game there against O State or in a late afternoon game against a USC .....but only if it was a stacked USC team
It would be interesting though to see how Bama would do at Columbus in a night game there against O State or in a late afternoon game against a USC .....but only if it was a stacked USC team
Posted on 3/31/17 at 2:04 pm to Cromulent
quote:
With a SOS that is laughable
BS. What SOS rankings have you been lookin' at? Sagarin, Billingsley, FEI, ESPN, Massey, Anderson, and Congrove would all disagree with you...
Posted on 3/31/17 at 2:05 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
I know some years ago they opened the season against UCLA in Pasadena and won big.
It was 2000 and we lost.
Posted on 3/31/17 at 2:06 pm to Fake news man
quote:
Ohio State has been more successful
Ohio State has won the other 4 titles in the last 8 years?
Posted on 3/31/17 at 2:07 pm to Fake news man
quote:
Ohio State has been more successful and definitely more consistent in my lifetime than Alabama
From 1990 to today
Using your time frame Alabama has won 5 national titles.
Ohio State has won two.
GTFO.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News