Started By
Message
re: What has missouri actually brought to the SEC?
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:56 pm to Jamie Lannister
Posted on 10/8/15 at 12:56 pm to Jamie Lannister
There is a recruiting board in case you missed it.
0
Posted on 10/8/15 at 1:01 pm to Kamikaze25
quote:
Just when we get rid of Nebraskafaninwi, we get Jamie Lannister... One in, one out... Jesus
what happened to Nebraska?
don't get why u guys always start beating up Clemson if you can't handle some return fire. all I said is I think that Clemson could bring more viewers to SEC than Mizzou.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 1:11 pm to Jamie Lannister
Posted on 10/8/15 at 1:13 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
all I said is I think that Clemson could bring more viewers to SEC than Mizzou.
Even if true, no one cares.
When the SEC contract is mature, when you see all the infrastructure improvements across the SEC, when you see the best coaches coming to the SEC for much more money you'll understand why it's not about eyes on tv sets.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 1:16 pm to TJGator1215
quote:
What has missouri actually brought to the SEC?
Television sets.
And according to the aggies, that's all that matters in the world.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 1:20 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
don't get why u guys always start beating up Clemson if you can't handle some return fire. all I said is I think that Clemson could bring more viewers to SEC than Mizzou.
The fact that you are trolling an SEC site. You are beating a dead horse with the same rhetoric. It's 100% factually incorrect that Clemson would/could bring more viewers to the SEC than Mizzou. Kansas City and Stl are 2 very large tv markets. I don't understand how you're not comprehending this concept. Clemson couldn't provide a glimpse of what our market has to offer.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 1:22 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
don't get why u guys always start beating up Clemson if you can't handle some return fire. all I said is I think that Clemson could bring more viewers to SEC than Mizzou.
The problem is this statement reveals your total lack of grasp about why a conference would want to add a team.
Then you went on roughly 15 post ranting about why Clemson is great.
Bringing us gems like:
We would have won a national title if not for FSU. LSU and UGA say hello and raise you an Alabama. UGA would also be able to say the same thing about LSU.
Clemson is a national brand. I doubt it. I make this assumption by how often they aren't in the main "national brand" game slot unless they are playing an actual national brand like ND or FSU.
Clemson's inability to win ACC titles in the last 30 years speaks volumes. But hey, keep on talking.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 1:24 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
And it still gets up to five pages. #lovemeuniversity
It's like we had a thread about this before, and they knew the score, but they couldn't help themselves again.
Let's get this to ten pages.
Why are all schools with Tiger mascots insecure???
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 10/8/15 at 1:55 pm to BYULSUalum
quote:
Since joining the SEC, Missouri has played Alabama, Auburn and LSU three times total. Two of those three times were in the SEC Championship game. Neither Auburn nor LSU have played them in conference, and Bama only once.
Now *that* is quite a bit of scheduling luck.
Oh... Missouri is 0-3 in those games.
So dumb to include LSU. Since joining the SEC Missouri has played Tennessee, Arkansas, and LSU 4 times total. They are 4-0 in those games.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 2:15 pm to roadGator
quote:
the SEC contract is mature, when you see all the infrastructure improvements across the SEC, when you see the best coaches coming to the SEC for much more money you'll understand why it's not about eyes on tv sets
you are not getting the best coaches already?
Butch, Bert, Muschamp are best in business
lol
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 10/8/15 at 2:17 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
Clemson's inability to win ACC titles in the last 30 years speaks volumes. But hey, keep on talking
Clemson has a recent ACC title, and made another title game recently, lost to GA tech whose win was vacated for NCAA violations.
fact Clemson hasn't one many ACC titles is proof it is a challenging conference.
most people including SEC fans respect Clemson.
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 10/8/15 at 2:24 pm to Jamie Lannister
quote:
most people including SEC fans respect Clemson
Don't tell me who I respect motherfricker!
Posted on 10/8/15 at 2:25 pm to Kamikaze25
quote:
What has missouri actually brought to the SEC? by Kamikaze25quote:most people including SEC fans respect Clemson Don't tell me who I respect motherfricker!
u not every SEC fan, fool. ;0
Posted on 10/8/15 at 2:58 pm to ATLdawg25
quote:
Missouri hasn't been run over like everyone hoped they would. That's all there is to it.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 3:41 pm to Rhino5
quote:
You appear nervous.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 4:55 pm to Kamikaze25
quote:
Just when we get rid of Nebraskafaninwi, we get Jamie Lannister
Nope, Jamie has been here, it is you just noticing them. Taters show up on Cocks radar pretty quick.
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News