Started By
Message
re: What has missouri actually brought to the SEC?
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:05 am to Kamikaze25
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:05 am to Kamikaze25
quote:
Womenz, blow, and football
Maty brought 2 of these by himself
1
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:12 am to TJGator1215
quote:
What has missouri actually brought to the SEC?
# 1 Men who like other men sexually and play football
# 2 Meth
# 3 Mayo
# 4 Mascot with a penchant for weed
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:35 am to Wtodd
haha 
Posted on 10/7/15 at 11:35 am to TJGator1215
quote:
They keep talking about their "success" and what they've done while in the sec. So let's take a look: Fball: 2012: 5-7 2013: 12-2 2014: 11-3 They've done okay in a down east mainly due to a weak SECW schedule and terrible years by SEC powers UF and UT. When they have played The SECW elite they been outscored 143-65 losing 2 SECCGs in blowouts. Another reason Miz was brought in was because they supposedly had a good basketball team. Lets see: 2012: 23-11 NCAAT 2013: 23-12 2014: 9-23 Miz Bball was average at best w/one short stay if you could call it that in the NCAAT, until they turned into a dumpster fire last year. Overall so far Mizz compares to the lesser SEC teams like SCAR, Arky and Ole miss who are only able to have success when the elite SEC schools are terrible, otherwise they are near the bottom of the conference. Mizz is currently 2-1 against UF yes, but that requires context. Mizzs Wins were against the worst UF coach/teams in it's history with the 2014 win being a complete fluke. Now let's compare UF: 2012: 11-2 BCS bowl 2013: 4-8 2014: 7-5 UF was good in 2012 but stunk in 2013&2014. I'd give Miz slight edge taking into account the circumstances for their success. UF Bball: 2012: 29-8 SEC regular season champs and a final 4 2013: 36-3 SEC RS/SECT Champs, #1 overall seed, 1st 18-0 RS in SEC history and a final 4. 2014:16-17 pure shite breaking 20 straight 20win seasons. There is no question UF was elite during this time but slipped last year. Massive edge UF Even with Missouri's "success"they still couldn't accomplish more than UF with future notable achievements looking unlikely.
So, you're basically saying Mizzou has brought more to the SEC than you have since they joined. Got it. But why are you bringing this up?
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:27 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
A bigger television market than what Clemson or FSU would have brought.
Clemson would bring better tv ratings SEC than Mizzou
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:33 am to Jamie Lannister
quote:
Clemson would bring better tv ratings SEC than Mizzou
:thatsnothowanyofthisworks:
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:35 am to TJGator1215
quote:
What has missouri actually brought to the SEC?
A civil war victory
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:36 am to TJGator1215
Gay BBQ
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:39 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
Gay BBQ
Boy, you best take that back
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:40 am to TJGator1215
quote:
hey've done okay in a down east mainly due to a weak SECW schedule
you meant we've done ok mainly due to the weak SEC EAST schedule...
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:41 am to TJGator1215
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:44 am to the808bass
quote:
Clemson would bring better tv ratings SEC than Mizzou :thatsnothowanyofthisworks:
I think it is, ratings means you are adding more televisions on national level, which also helps recruit nationally.
football fans in mizzou already watched a lot of SEC football prior to the school joing the SEC. you aren't adding that many sets.
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 11:45 am
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:46 am to Jamie Lannister
It's still amazing that with all the realignment talk that went on in CFB in the past 5 or so years that people still don't understand the most basic principles of it all.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:46 am to Jamie Lannister
quote:
football fans in mizzou already watched a lot of SEC football prior to the school joing the SEC. you aren't adding that many sets.
You really have no clue about how this works do you?
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:48 am to the808bass
quote:
It's still amazing that with all the realignment talk that went on in CFB in the past 5 or so years that people still don't understand the most basic principles of it all.
I think people who talk realignment all the time are a little weird. I'm sure I will never 'get it', much like I don't get conspiracy theories. :)
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:50 am to Jamie Lannister
Yet you're here arguing about TV sets Clemson (in a state already in the footprint of the SEC) would bring to the conference.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:50 am to TJGator1215
quote:
k:
Fball:
2012: 5-7
2013: 12-2
2014: 11-3
2015 4-8?
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:51 am to SamuelClemens
Bold.
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:53 am to the808bass
quote:
Yet you're here arguing about TV sets Clemson (in a state already in the footprint of the SEC) would bring to the conference
Clemson would bring better tv ratings nationally. Mizzou is only going to bring Mizzou fans and alumni, most of which already probably watched a good bit of SEC games.
ever Clemson vs SEC game brings good ratings. just a fact.
This post was edited on 10/8/15 at 11:54 am
Posted on 10/8/15 at 11:54 am to Jamie Lannister
And Clemson fans never watch SEC games. Interesting idea you got going there. Email ESPN about it.
I'm going to exit this conversation because you're dumb. Good luck!
I'm going to exit this conversation because you're dumb. Good luck!
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News