Started By
Message

re: What year has the SEC East been most down?

Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:16 am to
Posted by Tackle74
Columbia, MO
Member since Mar 2012
5257 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:16 am to
quote:

OK, you and the Mizzous wouldn't say that


No common sense would say that, Florida has not always been a juggernaut through their history, teams ascend and descend over time just look at Tenn. Any division with 2 Top 5 teams in the nation that is 27-29 vs the other division is not one of its worst years ever. The sense of entitlement some of you have is quite pathetic.
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Mizzeaux


Throwing so much bait out right now but barely getting a bite.
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13894 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:24 am to
Just having a reasonable conversation with a new ranter. I don't expect anything big.
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:24 am to
quote:

That was a sh!tstain on the conference, referees, and rules


yea we lost Andrew Wilson for a half for a similar hit, the ball carrier drops his head at the last millsecond before contact and they are gonna call that BS helmet to helmet.

This pussification needs to stop before it destroys us.

Posted by roadhouse
Chicago
Member since Sep 2013
2703 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:27 am to
A B1G school won the division in 2013, so that has to be the obvious answer.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95912 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:29 am to
2010, with 2013 being second.

2013 still had two top 5 teams from the east at the end of the year. 2010 was just bad for the east as whole.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111524 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:35 am to
quote:

If MSU, OM and Arky were the top three teams in the West this year, we'd all say the West was down and everyone would understand what that meant.


If two of those teams finished in the top 10 in the country, I'd say you're a daft codger.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73494 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:48 am to
2010 with 2013 in second place
Posted by slayerxing
Gainesville
Member since Feb 2010
11045 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:52 am to
2010 was a bad year but 2013 is probably 2nd. The reason for that has nothing to do with the name on the jerseys, but that uga, uk, uf, and ut got skull fricked out in ooc play, mizzou didnt beat any good teams until their bowl game and vandys sched was a joke.

Usce had the best ooc record by far beating 2 top 10 teams. Thats it, the division didnt do any other damage ooc.

Posted by MenloDawg
Member since Jan 2010
6719 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 11:58 am to
USCe fans will hate me for saying this, but it's the only correct answer: 2010

ETA: after reading through the posts, USCe fans have been completely reasonable.
This post was edited on 6/5/14 at 12:04 pm
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37636 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 12:03 pm to
2010
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95912 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

USCe fans will hate me for saying this, but it's the only correct answer: 2010 ETA: after reading through the posts, USCe fans have been completely reasonable.


After the initial high of making it, most of us can now look back and see just how truly bad the East was that year
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42349 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

After the initial high of making it, most of us can now look back and see just how truly bad the East was that year


2002, the west was just as bad, I mean had just as much "parity".

Football is cyclical, the question is when does the east start trending up, when does the west start trending down, will the west stay strong enough for the east to equally match it at its height, or will the two cross one another on an equal level with each trending in an opposite direction?

Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15737 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

2011 - Winner: UGA. 7-1, FL 3-5, Tenn 1-7.

2013 - Winner: Mizzou. 7-1, UGA 5-3, FL 3-5, Tenn 2-6.


USC finished second with a 6-2 record both of these years
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42349 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 12:47 pm to
And?

Where does it state they didn't?
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15737 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 12:54 pm to
I get this is one big troll thread, but if you're listing 3 teams from the division you might as well list the top 3 to make your case instead of random teams to help make your case.

Just because UF and UT are crap doesn't mean the division is
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42349 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

if you're listing 3 teams from the division you might as well list the top 3


I did.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Just because UF and UT are crap doesn't mean the division is

This is the only time I can remember agreeing with Cockopotamus!
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
24972 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

2010 - Winner: SCAR. 5-3, FL 4-4, UGA 3-5, Tenn 3-5
Easily. Only one ranked team and that team was blown out in the SEC Championship game by a record margin
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15737 posts
Posted on 6/5/14 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

I did.



Yea ok
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter