Started By
Message
re: Virginia Tech was the SEC's top choice during 2012 expansion
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:06 pm to beaver
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:06 pm to beaver
I would've loved it. One of my best friends swam a VTech and I'd have loved to elevate our smack talk to an in conference level. Only time we've lost to them was freshman year music city bowl lol.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:07 pm to beaver
Virginia Tech -- 2013 SEC EAST CHAMPS
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:08 pm to allin2010
You think I read articles before I post? Lulz
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:08 pm to allin2010
quote:
I think was probably
Very definitive.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:11 pm to beaver
Slive wanted A&M. Texas market >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D.C. Market.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:13 pm to beaver
would have been 10,000 times better than freakin missou
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:15 pm to beaver
VT would be a power house in the SEC. they'd beable to lock that region up in recruiting and that region produces quite a bit of talent
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:16 pm to beaver
Would've been a pretty good move imo
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:20 pm to cas4t
I would have really liked them as the cross division rival for A&M
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:21 pm to BloodSweat&Beers
quote:
Unlike the Razorbacks
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:23 pm to cas4t
So this is just finebaum's opinion?
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:23 pm to Dr RC
quote:
I would have really liked them as the cross division rival for A&M
Would've been a much more competitive series.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:23 pm to Dr RC
quote:
I would have really liked them as the cross division rival for A&M
Would've been a much more competitive series.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:29 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Lets get UNC and Kansas and call it a day.
If you're going to go in that direction, just get UNC and Duke.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:31 pm to DawgsLife
I really wish VT would have joined with us and were our cross division rival.
Missouri was a great fit...for the B1G.
Missouri was a great fit...for the B1G.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
would have been 10,000 times better than freakin missou
What's funny about that people talk about SEC schedule is too hard. Hell Mizzou seems to be fitting right in barring the 2012 season when the QB, OL, n star RB injured. What will people say if Mizzou competes again? Mizzou should never compete in the mighty SEC when they have lesser talent. Thats why OU is laughing at the mighty SEC. Yes VT would be better, if they compete then people won't talk shite on the SEC, but when Mizzou competes it makes the SEC look bad.
On a side note, VT don't want to join the SEC. When will people realize that!
This post was edited on 9/12/14 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:34 pm to Gradual_Stroke
Hey Stroke, would it have been a much more competitive series?
Anyone who wants to add UNC is insane. The school cheats at a level that makes the Alabama schools blush, and they're arrogant like Texas. frick those guys.
VaTech would be a good fit, for football at least. Their basketball and baseball programs are lackluster.
Anyone who wants to add UNC is insane. The school cheats at a level that makes the Alabama schools blush, and they're arrogant like Texas. frick those guys.
VaTech would be a good fit, for football at least. Their basketball and baseball programs are lackluster.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:35 pm to BloodSweat&Beers
quote:
Va Tech boosters wanted nothing to do with a SEC schedule. Per my uncle, former President of their booster club.
Thank you. For some reason people seem to think the SEC can get any school they want. Only 3 schools wanted to join the SEC.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:37 pm to bayou2003
Y'all quit being mean to Mizzou. They're here, they're not leaving. They were willing to step up and do it. So at least appreciate that.
Leaving decades old affiliations is no small matter.
Leaving decades old affiliations is no small matter.
This post was edited on 9/12/14 at 12:37 pm
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News