Started By
Message
re: Top QB, WR and RB Combo's for 2013
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:48 pm to KennesawTiger
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:48 pm to KennesawTiger
quote:
USC will, as they usually are, be fine at QB.
Great, that doesn't make them better than what Oregon has
1
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:49 pm to Patton
quote:
Great, that doesn't make them better than what Oregon has
Yeah, it does.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:49 pm to KennesawTiger
ok dude
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:53 pm to KennesawTiger
Why is a Notre Dame fan sticking up for USC?
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:54 pm to dawgdayafternoon
quote:
Why is a Notre Dame fan sticking up for USC?
SEC dominance has forged some unlikely alliances, it seems...
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:55 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
Not sure why Bama is above ATM, but whatever.
Bama's WRs are absolutely nasty, that's why.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:56 pm to KennesawTiger
Never thought I'd see the day.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:57 pm to gideon
Amari Cooper is nasty. That is about it.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:05 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
ATM is deeper
OP said that ESPN did not factor in depth just top at each position.
This is the second time - just glad you didn't RA this time.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:15 pm to Garfield
A&M should be ahead of Alabama. Especially given how much better out offensive line will be. I know the list excludes them, but you really can't. AJ will regress this year because of it.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:21 pm to Garfield
Well, this thread and debate isn't as pointless.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:22 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I know the list excludes them, but really you can't
Based on this, you might as well include every player on the team and just say who are the top 5 teams.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:25 pm to gatordmb89
But it's not nearly as interesting either.
That thread was anchored minutes after you RA'd - apparently you are not someone to be trifled with.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:28 pm to Garfield
I'd put JFF, Mike Evans, and either: Ben malena or Brandon Williams
Up against any 3 most years.
Should we go by yards or TD orrrrrr?
Up against any 3 most years.
Should we go by yards or TD orrrrrr?
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:29 pm to FormMorm
quote:
Should we go by yards or TD orrrrrr?
I don't know. Why don't you ask the guys on CFB live. They made the list
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:31 pm to Patton
It's our list now
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:32 pm to FormMorm
quote:I'd take Shaw, Alshon, and Latt
I'd put JFF, Mike Evans, and either: Ben malena or Brandon Williams
Up against any 3 most years.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:45 pm to FormMorm
quote:
Should we go by yards
They may have gone by rings.
J/k. They didn't really say, but I assume they were just going by the eye test with yards/TDs/wins sprinkled in.
For what it's worth, I think Evans is underrated. Yesterday on 104.5 the Zone in Nashville Chris Low was asked who are the top receivers in the SEC and he said Cooper was the clear 1, but Mathews and Evans were 2.a and 2.b and no one else was close to those three.
This post was edited on 5/3/13 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:48 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
Can you really make an argument any other way?
You could make an argument that Mike Evans is better than Amari Cooper, which would put A&M over the top.
Manziel > McCarron
Evans > Cooper
Yeldon > Malena/Williams
Posted on 5/3/13 at 4:52 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
You could make an argument that Mike Evans is better than Amari Cooper
You sure can
Page 3 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News