Started By
Message
re: Top QB, WR and RB Combo's for 2013
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:23 pm to KennesawTiger
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:23 pm to KennesawTiger
I was responding to your comment about Oregons lack of Qbs or RBs
This to be specific
quote:
quote: He just doesn't have a QB or RB.
It's better than what Oregon has left.
This to be specific
This post was edited on 5/3/13 at 3:24 pm
1
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:24 pm to Garfield
Honestly, bama should be #1. I'm also surprised they ranked UGA at 4th, considering ESPN can be hesitant to really heap praise on UGA unless it's obviously warranted. QB and RB we got, but I figured not having an elite WR would make them gloss over us. Not that I think Malcolm Mitchell is bad, I just assumed ESPN wouldn't know a ton about him.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:25 pm to Garfield
quote:
That Thomas kid could win the Heisman.
People were saying this before last year, too.
Assuming he's going to be playing RB, who is Oregon's receiver in this combo?
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:27 pm to Patton
We are talking overall sum of talent at the 3 positions.
USC > Oregon in this regard.
Is that sufficiently spelled out?
ETA: Thomas needs to be on the field more often than he is for Oregon.
USC > Oregon in this regard.
Is that sufficiently spelled out?
ETA: Thomas needs to be on the field more often than he is for Oregon.
This post was edited on 5/3/13 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:28 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
QB and RB we got, but I figured not having an elite WR would make them gloss over us. Not that I think Malcolm Mitchell is bad, I just assumed ESPN wouldn't know a ton about him.
MM is a damn good player. I'd have UGA higher too.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:30 pm to Garfield
Even though we are #1, that is not a great way of analyzing this. Depth is absolutely something you need to consider when ranking something like this.
This post was edited on 5/3/13 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:32 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:
Depth is absolutely something you need to consider when ranking something like this.
Yeah I don't think they're downplaying depth, this is just a "big 3" type of thing. It's a lot easier to do a silly, preseason ranking in May just looking at 3 people than factoring in the 1-5 at WR for each team.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:32 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:
Depth is absolutely something you need to consider when ranking something like this.
Not necessarily. A lot of teams don't sub on offense much because they don't have to.
Besides, it's the offseason. Gotta talk about something.
This post was edited on 5/3/13 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:34 pm to KennesawTiger
quote:At the very least, you have to include more than one receiver.
A lot of teams don't sub on offense much because they don't have to.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:34 pm to hg
quote:
OK
Sitting in a hotel room waiting for my meeting and pretty bored, but I did find it interesting that although people in the National media have been down on SEC offenses things are finally coming around with them saying 3 of the top 5 playmaker combos come from the SEC.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:35 pm to KennesawTiger
you
Garfield
you
so you are saying that USC has a better QB and/or RB than Oregon. Thats wrong. We were not discussing overall sum of talent.
quote:
Lee himself puts USC
Garfield
quote:
He just doesn't have a QB or RB.
you
quote:
It's better than what Oregon has left.
so you are saying that USC has a better QB and/or RB than Oregon. Thats wrong. We were not discussing overall sum of talent.
quote:
Is that sufficiently spelled out?
This post was edited on 5/3/13 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:35 pm to dawgdayafternoon
quote:
Who does Oregon have at RB and WR that's better than Gurley/Mitchell?
Marshall always gets lumped in with Gurley via "Gurshall", but in all seriousness... he isn't that good yet. He will probably develop and improve but he's just kind of meh right now.. Gurley/Yeldon/Hill are all 3 just on another level as far as SEC RB's go.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:35 pm to Garfield
It is not about depth, it's about a big three of sorts, so Bama being first is right. Second best nationally at QB, RB, and WR.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:37 pm to crimson008
I was talking about Malcolm Mitchell, our WR.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:38 pm to Patton
quote:
so you are saying that USC has a better QB and/or RB than Oregon. Thats wrong.
I disagree.
You are going out of your way to start an argument. You're going to have to do better.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:40 pm to KennesawTiger
quote:
I disagree.
ok
quote:
You are going out of your way to start an argument
false. I'm pointing out that you are wrong.
quote:
You're going to have to do better.
thanks I'll try
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:41 pm to Patton
quote:
false. I'm pointing out that you are wrong.
OK.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:42 pm to KennesawTiger
Who is USC starting Qb gonna be in the Fall? Kiff dawg hasn't picked one yet, as of 4/15/13
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:45 pm to Patton
quote:
Who is USC starting Qb gonna be in the Fall? Kiff dawg hasn't picked one yet, as of 4/15/13
Really dude?
Anyway, he gets his pick 2 Top 5 QB's from the 2011 class or Max Browne from last year.
USC will, as they usually are, be fine at QB.
Posted on 5/3/13 at 3:45 pm to Garfield
Not sure why Bama is above ATM, but whatever.
ATM has JFF and possibly the deepest RB corps in the SEC. That gives them the edge over Bama IMO. Bama has possibly the top RB in te SEC, but ATM is deeper.
ATM has JFF and possibly the deepest RB corps in the SEC. That gives them the edge over Bama IMO. Bama has possibly the top RB in te SEC, but ATM is deeper.
Page 2 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News