Started By
Message
re: Top 5 SEC RB
Posted on 8/10/17 at 8:35 am to FightingTigers138
Posted on 8/10/17 at 8:35 am to FightingTigers138
quote:
Ralph Webb should be number 2 on the list. Everybody knows he is getting the ball. He still does what he does....with Vanderbilt.
0
Posted on 8/10/17 at 8:40 am to JesusQuintana
Number 1 will be Nick Fitzgerald and number 2 will be Aeris williams
Posted on 8/10/17 at 8:43 am to RB10
quote:
The stats back it up
No they don't sorry.
quote:
He was the definition of average in 2016.
No he wasn't. Again, sorry. Way to ignore the rest of the post .
Posted on 8/10/17 at 8:52 am to DrewDawg13
quote:
No he wasn't. Again, sorry. Way to ignore the rest of the post .
Yards: 7th in conference & 44th nationally. "Average"
YPC: 23rd in conference & Outside top 100 nationally. "Below Average"
Yards per Game: 8th in conference & 48th Nationally. "Average:
TDs: t-14th in conference & t-101st nationally. "Below Average"
Try something other than "nu uh" in your next counter argument please. Thanks.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 8:58 am to DrewDawg13
quote:
I know people love to act like Chubb is some average back on here, but to not have him in the top 5 is literally insane.
Is it really literally insane?
Chubb has had more carries, and the lowest YPC on this list. The SEC is full of great RBs, it may be hard for some UGA fans to grasp, but some may think Chubb isn't top 5 in the SEC. Just on this list, Pettway and Guice ran for more yards on less carries. Crockett was within 70 yards on 71 less carries. Is it really that hard to imagine there are better RBs then Chubb, especially in the SEC?
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:00 am to DrewDawg13
quote:
Look up ANY RB ranking list. You will not find Chubb lower that 7th, in the nation, much less SEC.
It sounds like you need to actually look up some. You are going to be shocked.Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:05 am to JesusQuintana
Crockett is average. Pretty typical stats for that Baylor-style offense.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:20 am to TNTigerman
"Why would you even bother to put a Mizzou RB on this list? Mizzou is irrelevant. They don't belong in the league - and never will - so their players shouldn't be included in a Top 5, Top 10, or Top 50 list"
We are here whether you like it or not. Deal with it.
We are here whether you like it or not. Deal with it.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 9:22 am
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:22 am to RB10
quote:
Try something other than "nu uh" in your next counter argument please. Thanks.
I gave you plenty in my other post. All you did was ignore it.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 9:23 am
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:23 am to Chimlim
quote:
Is it really literally insane?
Chubb has had more carries, and the lowest YPC on this list. The SEC is full of great RBs, it may be hard for some UGA fans to grasp, but some may think Chubb isn't top 5 in the SEC. Just on this list, Pettway and Guice ran for more yards on less carries. Crockett was within 70 yards on 71 less carries. Is it really that hard to imagine there are better RBs then Chubb, especially in the SEC?
Yes it is absolutely insane. Again, anywhere outside of this board would agree with that.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:23 am to rockiee
quote:
It sounds like you need to actually look up some. You are going to be shocked.
Show me some examples.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:24 am to Crimsonpanther13
THIS
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:25 am to DrewDawg13
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:25 am to DrewDawg13
quote:
I gave you plenty in my other post. All you did was ignore it.
You gave excuses, most of which apply to every running back in the league.
quote:
Yes it is absolutely insane. Again, anywhere outside of this board would agree with that.
Except they don't.
quote:
Show me some examples.
There's one on the first page of this board.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 9:27 am
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:26 am to DBU
A list that has the widely regarded no. 1 back at 9?? Sure
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:28 am to DrewDawg13
quote:
A list that has the widely regarded no. 1 back at 9?? Sure
quote:
Look up ANY RB ranking list
This is why this argument is pointless with you. You are just an extreme homer.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:29 am to RB10
quote:
You gave excuses, most of which apply to every running back in the league.
False, most did not apply to any other RB, particularly the tearing of almost all the ligaments in a leg.
quote:
Except they don't
Yes they absolutely do.
quote:
There is one on the first page of this board
You mean the one that came out like an hour ago, and has the widely regarded no. 1 back at no. 9?? Ok
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:30 am to DrewDawg13
RK PLAYER TEAM ATT YDS YDS/A LONG TD
1 Derrius Guice, RB LSU 183 1387 7.6 96 15
2 Nick Fitzgerald, QB MSST 195 1375 7.1 74 16
3 Rawleigh Williams III, RB ARK 245 1360 5.6 72 12
4 Ralph Webb, RB VAN 250 1283 5.1 49 13
5 Kamryn Pettway, RB AUB 209 1224 5.9 64 7
6 Stanley Williams, RB UK 171 1170 6.8 63 7
7 Nick Chubb, RB UGA 224 1130 5.0 55 8
8 Benjamin Snell Jr., RB UK 186 1091 5.9 48 13
9 Damarea Crockett, RB MIZ 153 1062 6.9 39 10
10 Trayveon Williams, RB TA&M 156 1057 6.8 89 8
1 Derrius Guice, RB LSU 183 1387 7.6 96 15
2 Nick Fitzgerald, QB MSST 195 1375 7.1 74 16
3 Rawleigh Williams III, RB ARK 245 1360 5.6 72 12
4 Ralph Webb, RB VAN 250 1283 5.1 49 13
5 Kamryn Pettway, RB AUB 209 1224 5.9 64 7
6 Stanley Williams, RB UK 171 1170 6.8 63 7
7 Nick Chubb, RB UGA 224 1130 5.0 55 8
8 Benjamin Snell Jr., RB UK 186 1091 5.9 48 13
9 Damarea Crockett, RB MIZ 153 1062 6.9 39 10
10 Trayveon Williams, RB TA&M 156 1057 6.8 89 8
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:31 am to rockiee
quote:
This is why this argument is pointless with you. You are just an extreme homer.
Look at that list. It literally came out this morning. And if you agree with that list, that's just crazy. Please show me another one that has Chubb ranked lower than 7th.
Posted on 8/10/17 at 9:33 am to rockiee
quote:
This is why this argument is pointless with you. You are just an extreme homer.
Fact.
Page 3 of 11
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News