Started By
Message

re: This whole Michael Sam gay-out could be a well crafted marketing ploy.

Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:31 pm to
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:31 pm to
failblog.roadie.org



This post was edited on 2/11/14 at 3:32 pm
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58126 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Go and read Matthew, take a class in Biblical Hermeneutics, so you can interpret it properly, and then get back to me..


maybe you should take a class on the history of the Bible and Christianity first?


you do realize that not only have interpretations changed over time but the contents of the book as well?
This post was edited on 2/11/14 at 3:34 pm
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23179 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:36 pm to
Loathor is cracking me up! I'm so glad this is a place where shiny, furry bastards can just be themselvez.

Carry on!
Posted by tungi01
Dallas, Texas
Member since May 2012
1590 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

maybe you should take a class on the history of the Bible and Christianity first?


you do realize that not only have interpretations changed over time but the contents of the book as well?


The Dead Sea Scrolls and the the over 25,000 NT manuscripts say hello..
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58126 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:37 pm to



so what you are saying is you don't know much about the book or the religion you follow
Posted by DontCare
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2012
2516 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Go and read Matthew, take a class in Biblical Hermeneutics, so you can interpret it properly, and then get back to me..

i have. there are no passages in the NT dealing with homosexuality.

so, either you get to lord leviticus over gays while committing the heinous sin of mixed fabrics -or- leviticus was made irrelevant by the good news, making homosexuality and mixed fabrics not explicit sins, even if it doesn't illicitly condone them.

which is it?
Posted by Loathor
Columbia, SC
Member since Jun 2012
2369 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Go eat a dick you pole smoking, inbred redneck!!


Hey, no need for the personal attacks. Your kinks are what make you a shiny snowflake in a world of snowflakes. Celebrate your differences, don't cower in the corner like a backwards, retarded neanderthal...
Posted by tungi01
Dallas, Texas
Member since May 2012
1590 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

i have. there are no passages in the NT dealing with homosexuality.

so, either you get to lord leviticus over gays while committing the heinous sin of mixed fabrics -or- leviticus was made irrelevant by the good news, making homosexuality and mixed fabrics not explicit sins, even if it doesn't illicitly condone them.

which is it?


While you may have read the text, you obviously have not taken a hermeneutics class. True, the NT does not specifically say that homosexuality is a sin, but it does say that a man shall leave his husband and cleave to his wife.. Not cleave to his husband.. Sorry but a wife is a woman.. The NT does not "specifically" say that human sacrificing to the Norse god Thor is a sin. But if we interpret the text as a whole, I think most logical people can agree that it is not a cool thing to do..
This post was edited on 2/11/14 at 3:45 pm
Posted by tungi01
Dallas, Texas
Member since May 2012
1590 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Hey, no need for the personal attacks. Your kinks are what make you a shiny snowflake in a world of snowflakes. Celebrate your differences, don't cower in the corner like a backwards, retarded neanderthal...


Let's do that!!
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19257 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

god we're cynical people.

Maybe dude just wanted to not hide that he's gay.
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23179 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

it does say that a man shall leave his husband and cleave to his wife

Is this really what you meant to say?
Posted by tungi01
Dallas, Texas
Member since May 2012
1590 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

it does say that a man shall leave his husband and cleave to his wife


Is this really what you meant to say?




Dammit.. Was out too late last night.. UUGGHHH!

"Leave his parents and cleave to his wife.."
Posted by Loathor
Columbia, SC
Member since Jun 2012
2369 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

While you may have read the text, you obviously have not taken a hermeneutics class. True, the NT does not specifically say that homosexuality is a sin, but it does say that a man shall leave his husband and cleave to his wife.. Not cleave to his husband.. Sorry but a wife is a woman..


Um... husband is a man. So if a man is leaving his husband... doesn't that mean that the bible condones gay marriage by acknowledging it's existence?



PS -- Don't bother asking... never studied hermeneutics, never going to study hermeneutics, not even looking up what hermeneutics is because the word itself sounds utterly boring. Thanks though....
Posted by DontCare
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2012
2516 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

True, the NT does not specifically say that homosexuality is a sin, but it does say that a man shall leave his husband and cleave to his wife.. Not cleave to his husband.. Sorry but a wife is a woman..

he was quoting genesis. and that quote was in response to the specific question of whether a man can divorce his wife for any reason. so, hermetically, by using "wife" in his answer, he was not specifically excluding same-sex partners. he was just answering the question asked.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140705 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

failblog.roadie.org


7 pages

Posted by tungi01
Dallas, Texas
Member since May 2012
1590 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

he was quoting genesis. and that quote was in response to the specific question of whether a man can divorce his wife for any reason. so, hermetically, by using "wife" in his answer, he was not specifically excluding same-sex partners. he was just answering the question asked.



So what you are saying is that wife can actually mean "a man"?
This post was edited on 2/11/14 at 4:00 pm
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
failblog.roadie.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



7 pages


I never said it was an unpopular blog.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140705 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:14 pm to


I'm sorry you didn't like my opinion.
Posted by Liberty tiger13
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2014
531 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:16 pm to
Just to throw a wrench I like my wife to be a woman!! May I get a relentless amount of press???

Posted by Rebellious
Member since Dec 2013
198 posts
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:46 pm to
The same cynical argument was made about Jason Collins' coming out, but guess what?--he did not get signed by any NBA team as a free agent.....and I am sure that Michael Sam was aware of that, so your whole premise is ridiculous and reveals nothing except that you are threatened by the fact that a gay guy is six times the man that you ever will be......
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter