Started By
Message
re: the myth of alabama's 12 mythical national championships
Posted on 10/31/11 at 4:55 pm to billfish21
Posted on 10/31/11 at 4:55 pm to billfish21
Trolling using a shitty Bleacher Report article as material...
0
Posted on 10/31/11 at 4:57 pm to BayouBengals03
That is actually the most complete and unbiased or logical articles I have read about bama's NC's.
Everyone just saying "ban because bleacher report" or whatever were probably too stupid or lazy to ever read the article and just wanted to look cool.
Bama has 8 NCs (including 1992). I think that is the most fair assessment and I learned something reading that article.
Everyone just saying "ban because bleacher report" or whatever were probably too stupid or lazy to ever read the article and just wanted to look cool.
Bama has 8 NCs (including 1992). I think that is the most fair assessment and I learned something reading that article.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 4:59 pm to billfish21
quote:
some of you frickers have ZERO sense of humor... and that was way too fricking easy.
quote:
Bama has 8 NCs (including 1992).
Correct.
This post was edited on 10/31/11 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 10/31/11 at 4:59 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
That is actually the most complete and unbiased or logical articles I have read about bama's NC's.
Everyone just saying "ban because bleacher report" or whatever were probably too stupid or lazy to ever read the article and just wanted to look cool.
Bama has 8 NCs (including 1992). I think that is the most fair assessment and I learned something reading that article.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 5:06 pm to Crompdaddy8
Bama just got lucky they pulled this bullshite before the internet, bloggers and sports media got to where it is today. They've been saying it so long that most people just go with it. If a UA staff member tried that nowadays, he'd get eaten alive.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 5:07 pm to Crompdaddy8
By the way, I meant 8 including 2009 (and of course 1992) since the article was written before the 2009 BCSNCG...
But anyway, I think 8 is the number that I can buy as being the "most" accurate assessment for bama.
But anyway, I think 8 is the number that I can buy as being the "most" accurate assessment for bama.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 5:10 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Nobody gives a frick what you can or cannot "buy"...unless you're talking about Cam Newton.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 5:11 pm to DvlsAdvocat
Haha. That was a good one.
Nice contribution numbnuts.
Nice contribution numbnuts.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 5:17 pm to billfish21
quote:
LINK
talk among yourselves
Dont you know this is a Bama board and you AND your childrens children will get banned for eternity for posting something like this?
Posted on 10/31/11 at 5:22 pm to billfish21
quote:
AND... I unlike some of you posters seem to be far too fixated on anal sex with a man - I should be careful who I share my fantasies with... I am certainly looking forward to duck and deer camps this year.
Fixed it for you.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 5:26 pm to JOHNN
Bama's 1983 media guide paints a better picture than the bleacher report can.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 5:38 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
I have no problem claiming our 4 undefeated Rose Bowl winning seasons from before the AP era as championships because that was the only way true championships were awarded in those days. If you don't like that then you are just wrong. You have to give credit for titles by the criteria required for them at the time.
If you only are willing to acknowledge BCS titles, then you are discounting a lot of football that was played. Same with poll titles. Before the major polls, titles were widely accepted as undefeated rose bowl champions when these were available.
Just because you dont want to count them, doesn't mean they didn't happen and weren't awarded.
I don't claim 1941. However I still say we have 13 titles. And the reason is because we got fricked dry twice and lubed a couple other times, and you don't find any current merchandise that discounts 41 so I figure the times we got fricked even out the crappy 41 claim enough that I can still wear a shirt that claims it in its count.
That's how I see it. If you don't agree, take it up with God when you see him one day.
If you only are willing to acknowledge BCS titles, then you are discounting a lot of football that was played. Same with poll titles. Before the major polls, titles were widely accepted as undefeated rose bowl champions when these were available.
Just because you dont want to count them, doesn't mean they didn't happen and weren't awarded.
I don't claim 1941. However I still say we have 13 titles. And the reason is because we got fricked dry twice and lubed a couple other times, and you don't find any current merchandise that discounts 41 so I figure the times we got fricked even out the crappy 41 claim enough that I can still wear a shirt that claims it in its count.
That's how I see it. If you don't agree, take it up with God when you see him one day.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 5:57 pm to Party At LSU
quote:that is one nice pic
Party At LSU
Posted on 10/31/11 at 6:06 pm to billfish21
quote:
billfish21
God, some of you fricking swamptards are stupid.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 6:11 pm to Quigley
Did read again! Have read again! Would read again!
Posted on 10/31/11 at 6:14 pm to ThaKaptin
It's 8. Very impressive!
Posted on 10/31/11 at 6:15 pm to THamma
so we can't count anything pre-bryant?
Posted on 10/31/11 at 6:31 pm to billfish21
Post more times like this.
Posted on 10/31/11 at 6:33 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Alabama has 8 major poll national championships.
Nobody in CFB has more. Pretty impressive, even without counting all the undefeated Rose Bowl teams from before the poll era
Posted on 10/31/11 at 6:45 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
at the guy who says 83 is an Au NC, by the lyingist, cheatingest coach this state has ever known. 
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News