Started By
Message
re: THE Georgia Bulldogs have notched one, count 'em, one sack in 3 games
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:02 pm to DrSEC
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:02 pm to DrSEC
oh ok lemme go ahead and go nuts, WE SACKED OLE MISS AND MSU QBS OMG LOLOLOLOL
hey dip shite, is murray still killing it for ya? gotta google some stats? here, post your answer in a killer as BR article.
hey dip shite, is murray still killing it for ya? gotta google some stats? here, post your answer in a killer as BR article.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:06 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Murray had ONE bad game. However, I am not the one who is stupid enough to start these kind of topics.
**You started a thread about your team lacking sacks when they were second in the SEC in pass defense. Just shows your absolute lack of football knowledge. Just proving my point.
**You started a thread about your team lacking sacks when they were second in the SEC in pass defense. Just shows your absolute lack of football knowledge. Just proving my point.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:09 pm to DrSEC
several bad games
but hey, we just went postal on the two MS schools. you sir are fricking brillaint. i look forward to your next BR article so i can start fapping to this national title caliber team
but hey, we just went postal on the two MS schools. you sir are fricking brillaint. i look forward to your next BR article so i can start fapping to this national title caliber team
This post was edited on 10/1/11 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:12 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Actually...the ACTUAL defense has only given up 27 points to the opposing offenses in the last 4 games. 34 if you count the fumble ran back to the five.
Either way they are only giving up 6.8 to 8.5 ppg since their loss to Boise. Sad that you cheer for your team to fail and will not admit when you are wrong.
Either way they are only giving up 6.8 to 8.5 ppg since their loss to Boise. Sad that you cheer for your team to fail and will not admit when you are wrong.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:16 pm to DrSEC
what's sad is how you think you're this god damn college football guru who is so above the likes of little ole me. i said the first few games lacked sacks. they did. did i say it would continue? no, did i think it would? yea, pretty much. do i think a bunch of sacks vs Ole Miss and MSU merit a complete disregard for what i have seen the last 2 years?
absolutely not. i'll remain cautious because being a dawg fan under the richt regime the last years has taught me a few things. clearly you haven't learned jack shite, doc.
is the BR article up yet???
absolutely not. i'll remain cautious because being a dawg fan under the richt regime the last years has taught me a few things. clearly you haven't learned jack shite, doc.
is the BR article up yet???
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:16 pm to DrSEC
yeah ive actually been very happy with the defense thus far. they held miss st. to 3 points today. dont care who you are playing in the sec. 3 points is awesome.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:17 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:Boom bitch!!
what's sad is how you think you're this god damn college football guru who is so above the likes of little ole me. i said the first few games lacked sacks. they did. did i say it would continue? no, did i think it would? yea, pretty much. do i think a bunch of sacks vs Ole Miss and MSU merit a complete disregard for what i have seen the last 2 years?
absolutely not. i'll remain cautious because being a dawg fan under the richt regime the last years has taught me a few things. clearly you haven't learned jack shite, doc.
is the BR article up yet???
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:20 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
they're playing very good right now, 50 yards rushing is fantastic. i doubt UT gets 100 rushing either. curious to see this backfield tested by Braysus.
i really can't wait for knox
i really can't wait for knox
quote:
child
This post was edited on 10/1/11 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:21 pm to Damn Good Dawg
You do understand that your reference to lack of sacks was idiotic? The point is not just that they are getting them now....the point is you were uneducated enough to understand they were second in the SEC in pass defense at the time.
Once again, you have proven to be a fake fan. You want your team to fail.
In regards to the BR article....let me state it for you again. I post the articles that I write on BR because it drives thousands of extra readers to my site. I know this is hard for you to understand but it is called "branding".
Once again, you have proven to be a fake fan. You want your team to fail.
In regards to the BR article....let me state it for you again. I post the articles that I write on BR because it drives thousands of extra readers to my site. I know this is hard for you to understand but it is called "branding".
This post was edited on 10/1/11 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:27 pm to DrSEC
there pass rush was mediocre at best. idc what the stats said. they did abysmal vs boise and did not make plays vs USC. CC they piddled around and finally we play 2 fricking games and you think your jesus christ with the solid call because the state of MS cannot field an OL.
and you really analyze stat ranks 2 weeks in? really? who's the dumb arse again?
and who said i want my team to fail? i just went to my 18th strait home game and i have gone to my 5th game and i plan on going to 7 more. frick you and your idea of a real fan.
and lemme know when you get it up buddy, BR is where the best of the best accumulate to spew rehashed shite just so you can see your doofus name up top. big deal bro, you're a self appointed college football writer who argues with douche bags like me on TD and still sound like a tool.
get off your high horse. you haven't done shite to merit your show boating off a fact you didn't do shite to prove. hell, i am not even wrong.
and you really analyze stat ranks 2 weeks in? really? who's the dumb arse again?
and who said i want my team to fail? i just went to my 18th strait home game and i have gone to my 5th game and i plan on going to 7 more. frick you and your idea of a real fan.
and lemme know when you get it up buddy, BR is where the best of the best accumulate to spew rehashed shite just so you can see your doofus name up top. big deal bro, you're a self appointed college football writer who argues with douche bags like me on TD and still sound like a tool.
get off your high horse. you haven't done shite to merit your show boating off a fact you didn't do shite to prove. hell, i am not even wrong.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:27 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
they're playing very good right now, 50 yards rushing is fantastic. i doubt UT gets 100 rushing either. curious to see this backfield tested by Braysus.
i really can't wait for knox
im very interested as well. i think we will be pleased though, at least on that side of the ball. im probably most worried about the passing game after murray's show today. i still think we need to target TK more. excited to see crowell keep being awesome as well.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:28 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
the OL simply has to improve as does murray and i think when the OL slows down the rush then Murray won't be so off
our OL will determine that game because if crowell can continue we will win
our OL will determine that game because if crowell can continue we will win
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:37 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
there pass rush was mediocre at best.
You do understand that sometimes you rush....sometimes you drop back. This commentary makes me sad for you.
quote:
and you think your jesus christ
Nope. Not even close.
quote:
and you really analyze stat ranks 2 weeks in? really? who's the dumb arse again?
You do realize it was week 3 AND you were using a stat as your defense (the one sack). I was pointing out that sacks do not always tell the story....again....I feel bad for you.
quote:
writer who argues with douche bags like me
Well we can agree on that. However, I will take it further than that. You are #1 in the Dawg Nation in this area.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:42 pm to DrSEC
I'm much obliged to your pity, if only I shared your same intellect.
I guess the best I can figure salvaging from this is to agree to disagree and that you sir are a grade one arse hat.
I guess the best I can figure salvaging from this is to agree to disagree and that you sir are a grade one arse hat.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:44 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
I'm much obliged to your pity, if only I shared your same intellect.
I guess the best I can figure salvaging from this is to agree to disagree and that you sir are a grade one arse hat.
You know the first sign of someone who doesn't have a clue of what they are speaking (or typing)? They go to name calling to try to hide their weak argument. This also makes me very sad for you.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:51 pm to DrSEC
quote:
You know the first sign of someone who doesn't have a clue of what they are speaking (or typing)? They go to name calling to try to hide their weak argument. This also makes me very sad for you.
another sign of a crappy argument is someone who repeatedly points to statistics without conceding those stats tell only half the story.
what point are you even trying to make? our D is getting pressure?
cuz it's not. there were way too many times this week and last where the QB had far too much time in, or out of the pocket. our Dline and lbs definitely struggled at times to get to the QB in time. lots of room for improvement.
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:52 pm to saltydawg
Dont yall DARE question The Leading Source in the SEC!!!
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:52 pm to Damn Good Dawg
That's because Brandon Burrows got hurt before 1st game.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News