Started By
Message

re: Texas Done w/ A&M Rivalry Unless "Compelling Reason" to Resume

Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:10 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111617 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

compelling reason' to resume


I read that and think it means "when we feel like we can dominate them."
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105449 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:14 pm to
aTm would dominate that rivalry from here on out anyway. Texas saving their arse from embarrassment.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42695 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:14 pm to
Well if that's what they want but I don't think it's a long term help for UTex just a short term one (they want to avoid losing). However, if the rivalry resumed UTex would get exposure once a year on the SEC Network with SEC recruits watching. Rivalries help exposure and hype and Texas being recruit rich or not you want a presence in SEC recruiting grounds. With the rise of A&M, TCU, and Baylor pickings are slimmer for UTex than they used to be and the smart thing would be to establish a presence in SEC Country.
This post was edited on 4/25/14 at 5:15 pm
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13894 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

I read that and think it means "When the administrators that are pissed off about the teams leaving our dead conference are all gone we'll stop punishing the fans."



FIFY
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46565 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:14 pm to
Couldnt possibly care less
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145254 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:16 pm to
which is how I think the majority of us feel about this. weve been saying the exact same thing for over a year
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:17 pm to
That would be the smart thing for them to do. The reason they haven't tried yet is simply pride. Truth be told, Texas didn't believe TAMU would pull the trigger on an SEC move, and their administration has been in scramble mode dealing with it ever since their bluff was called. Simply put, all of their history of how they've done business with us over the years no longer applies to the current complexion of the rivalry, and they honestly don't know what to do with the new status quo.
Posted by Warrior Poet
Living Rent-Free in Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
7956 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:17 pm to
Pour out my jar and heads home
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42695 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

which is how I think the majority of us feel about this. weve been saying the exact same thing for over a year


I honestly don't see how it benefits A&M. However, if I were UTex I'd be dying to resume the game to expand my recruiting footprint.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145254 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:18 pm to
and further more, who cares what they want to do in regards to this game. weve made it clear that WE don't want to play and them coming around will have absolutely nothing to do with the game coming back whatsoever
Posted by finestfirst79
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Member since Nov 2012
11646 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:19 pm to
I'd like to see them play again, but I'm not holding my breath. I know most of the Aggies here disagree, and that's fine. For old curmudgeons like me the game was more about the bonfire than the actual game. The younger guys here never experienced that, so the game was... well, a game.

I don't see it happening any time soon. A&M had the temerity to leave big brother and must be punished. A&M says "Oh yeah? Well we don't need you, either. Nyahh nyahh nyahh." Sounds childish but I don't see that changing for a good long while.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70945 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

so let me guess, we were called bitches for saying this same exact thing a few months ago. now that its texas saying this, its ok. right?



considering texas didn't sprint from the conference as fast as they could, yes
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145254 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:20 pm to
oh you
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

I honestly don't see how it benefits A&M.


Look at how our brand has risen on a national level in the past two years. Yes, Johnny was a big part of that, but playing higher visibility opponents more regularly and in a greater geographic area without having to deal with the shadow our in state rival ineluctably casts has been instrumental in that success as well.

Our marketing is experiencing a boon that is unprecedented and much of that is attributable to not having texas as a conference mate/regular opponent.
Posted by Old Money
Member since Sep 2012
36528 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:22 pm to
I'm starting to believe Texas is actually scared.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

I'd like to see them play again, but I'm not holding my breath. I know most of the Aggies here disagree, and that's fine. For old curmudgeons like me the game was more about the bonfire than the actual game.


I'm with you

I'll come back eventually. For our purposes right now though, I hope we establish ourselves in this conference more soundly first.

I grew up with the A&M/texas game, and was one of the few of my classmates that can say they saw on campus bonfire burn in person. It'll be back.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

I honestly don't see how it benefits A&M. However, if I were UTex I'd be dying to resume the game to expand my recruiting footprint.


It wouldn't benefit A&M at all. There's no upside for us. It's like playing a bowl game against a historically bad team that's having one okay year. If you lose to them you tarnish your brand. If you win, nobody cares.

UTw, on the other hand, gets the chance to be the brand-tarnisher AND exposure to SEC recruits on the SEC Network, so there's a great deal of potential upside for them, but they can't look like they're begging for it right now as all that would do is reinforce the perception that they're THE program that got bitch-slapped by the effects of SEC expansion. So, for now, they lay low and wait for someone in power at A&M to one day make an overture, which they'd jump on.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111617 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

considering texas didn't sprint from the conference as fast as they could, yes

So A&M was scared of the competition of UT. And because of that fear they went to the SEC West. Interesting proposition.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46565 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

considering texas didn't sprint from the conference as fast as they could, yes


So we left the Big XII at a time when Texas and OU were at 15 year program lows and went to the SEC West because we were scared?

Interesting theory.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 4/25/14 at 5:32 pm to
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter