Started By
Message
re: Steele in best position of all new SEC coordinators
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:11 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:11 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Why would you need CBs that can be put on an island if he's not bringing pressure and he's just trying to play contain?
Because the QB has all day to throw.
0
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:14 pm to LSUNV
quote:
a guy that couldn't find his arse with A mirror
This is a peculiar turn of phrase
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:14 pm to LSUNV
quote:
#Keepthefaith
yes, but LSU fans are convinced that they don't need a qb because they beat Aggie. And Fournette will just rush for 3,000 years anyway..
and haven't you heard Manziel was only 3*, so LSU's 2* could be like Manziel.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:16 pm to chilge1
quote:
Don't you think having an offense that puts your D on the field for 40 minutes constitutes a problem?
This is the root of the problem with spread offense/fast pace teams. They thrive in back and forth, high-scoring games when their offense can build momentum. But encounter an offense who controls the clock, wears the defense down over the course of 4 quarters, not allowing the offense to get into a groove, and the spread offense/defense is negated. I think this is why you haven't seen A&M have much success against the Bama's and LSUs's of the conference. I'm not sure any defensive coordinator could change that. It's a difference in total team philosophies.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:17 pm to TbirdSpur2010
I heard it on TV the other day and about choked on My frosty beverage
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:18 pm to WRTC
quote:
yes, but LSU fans are convinced that they don't need a qb because they beat Aggie. And Fournette will just rush for 3,000 years anyway..
What the frick are you talking about?
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:19 pm to WRTC
quote:
LSU's 2* could be like Manziel.
You are going to have to refresh my memory exactly who this is your talking about
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:21 pm to ALTiger
quote:
This is the root of the problem with spread offense/fast pace teams. They thrive in back and forth, high-scoring games when their offense can build momentum. But encounter an offense who controls the clock, wears the defense down over the course of 4 quarters, not allowing the offense to get into a groove, and the spread offense/defense is negated. I think this is why you haven't seen A&M have much success against the Bama's and LSUs's of the conference. I'm not sure any defensive coordinator could change that. It's a difference in total team philosophies.
I posted something similar a while back
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:22 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Why would you need CBs that can be put on an island if he's not bringing pressure and he's just trying to play contain?
Think about the DBs LSU has had under Chavis, and ask yourself one question: "Why did they NEVER have a #1 passing D, and only half the time were they ranked in the top 10."
The answer: Chavis' scheme doesn't generate much pressure on the QB.
That's why you need CBs that can be put on an island.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:23 pm to WRTC
What 2* QB are you referencing?
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:23 pm to ALTiger
quote:
This is the root of the problem with spread offense/fast pace teams. They thrive in back and forth, high-scoring games when their offense can build momentum. But encounter an offense who controls the clock, wears the defense down over the course of 4 quarters, not allowing the offense to get into a groove, and the spread offense/defense is negated. I think this is why you haven't seen A&M have much success against the Bama's and LSUs's of the conference. I'm not sure any defensive coordinator could change that. It's a difference in total team philosophies.
Isn't TCU a spread quick scoring offense?
Where did their Defense rank?
...
Justin McMillan
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:26 pm to WRTC
quote:
Isn't TCU a spread quick scoring offense?
43rd in TOP. So, no they aren't.
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:27 pm to WRTC
quote:
Isn't TCU a spread quick scoring offense?
And the BIG 12 is filled with Spread offenses. A&M has had success against the spread teams in the SEC. My point was that a team with a fast-paced offensive identity, has a very hard time against a big and physical ground and pound type offensive identity.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:29 pm to WRTC
No they aren't you stupid fricking troll.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:29 pm to WRTC
Justin McMillan won't see the field and I have not heard anything resembling he would be Manziel caliber.
Pulling shite out your arse now
Pulling shite out your arse now
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:32 pm to WRTC
nm
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:34 pm to WRTC
quote:
Justin McMillan
No one is expecting him to see playing time for a while. Harris and Franks are the QB's of the future.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:37 pm to Brageous
quote:
No they aren't you stupid fricking troll.
I think you're being easy on the guy.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:38 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Losing to a team during their Great Declination 4x in a row is enough punishment as it is..
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:38 pm to Brageous
quote:
VermilionTiger
quote:
It's as if the last few seasons when Tennessee had shite for talent on defense (still better than A&M though) and Chavis couldn't do shite with it is being totally forgotten here
what was UT's Defense rank in Chavis' last year
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News