Started By
Message
re: So adding Clemson and FSU to the SEC was not a bad idea after all...
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:28 pm to SlowEasyConfident
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:28 pm to SlowEasyConfident
quote:
Then why does Clemson keep kicking that arse?
What do you mean why then? Are you actually disputing the fact that SC is the larger school and has more alum?
This post was edited on 2/9/17 at 11:29 pm
1
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:30 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
Speaking of Tillman...
If you say his name 3 times, he will appear!
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:32 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
Are you actually disputing the fact that SC is the larger school and has more alum?
UCF is a large school too. Doesn't mean shite
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:38 pm to SlowEasyConfident
And UCF, on the whole, doesn't give a shite about its sports teams. Especially relative to UF and FSU.
Sorry, despite its wins and losses both SC and Clemson care dearly about athletics, especially football. And as the team with more students, alum, and merch sales, we just make more money than Clemson does.
Why do you think Forbes always puts us at a higher value than Clemson every year?
I know, poor Clemson. All those wins and still no body loves them.
Sorry, despite its wins and losses both SC and Clemson care dearly about athletics, especially football. And as the team with more students, alum, and merch sales, we just make more money than Clemson does.
Why do you think Forbes always puts us at a higher value than Clemson every year?
I know, poor Clemson. All those wins and still no body loves them.
This post was edited on 2/9/17 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:45 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
especially football.
Football (the big money maker), is not even close between the two schools
Clemson Football is bringing in a shite ton of money right now
Just opened up a 50 million dollar football ops facility, SC is trying to copy and had to low ball an amount for their own which won't open for a few years
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:48 pm to SlowEasyConfident
Sorry, brah. Twist it how you want to. Clemson just doesn't make as much money as we do.
This post was edited on 2/10/17 at 1:01 am
Posted on 2/9/17 at 11:49 pm to theGarnetWay
That explanation is way too complicated for an Aubie
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:02 am to Mister Tee
I think a better topic to start is...
When is Mister Tee going to spit the orange and purple dick out of his mouth?
over/under set at never.
and go.
When is Mister Tee going to spit the orange and purple dick out of his mouth?
over/under set at never.
and go.
This post was edited on 2/10/17 at 12:10 am
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:54 am to Mr.Sinister
Clemson will drop off the face of the earth for a couple years after losing deshaun Watson.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 1:47 am to Mister Tee
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO....*BREATH*....NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
DONT FEED FEED THE TROLLS
DONT FEED FEED THE TROLLS
This post was edited on 2/10/17 at 1:49 am
Posted on 2/10/17 at 2:06 am to Mister Tee
I'd trade Mizzou for anybody. Maybe even Tulane. SJW U embarrassing us on and off the field.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 5:03 am to SlowEasyConfident
quote:
Clemson beat the SEC this year by a combined score of 110 to 51 this season
ACC is a better all around league
And yet here you are..... On an SEC message board.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 6:33 am to Mister Tee
Not sure why this is so hard fro some fans of various SEC schools to understand: expansion will only take place in order to expand the SEC TV market. There is no economic reason whatsoever to add a school from the existing footprint.
I have always thought having FSU would be great from a football rivalry standpoint, but there is no economic reason to add them based on TV coverage, and that is what drives expansion.
I have always thought having FSU would be great from a football rivalry standpoint, but there is no economic reason to add them based on TV coverage, and that is what drives expansion.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 6:40 am to ipodking
Just like we were when we played lsu? I recall lsu got beat and FSU bitched out. It's no surprise you would see it that way.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 6:45 am to FourThreeForty
quote:
You have to take into account what their record would be if they were indeed in the SEC. Despite their talent, do you think either of them could go through the SEC gauntlet like Alabama?
The SEC has not been very good the last 2 years, so yes Clemson would have gone through that "gauntlet" just like they went through alabama's defense the last two years.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 6:47 am to Mister Tee
So, I'm smart enough to know that adding two more good teams to the SEC would only make it tougher for my team, which has been the most dominant team in the country for the past 8 years.
What do you think adding two more good teams to the SEC does for YOUR team?
What do you think adding two more good teams to the SEC does for YOUR team?
Posted on 2/10/17 at 6:54 am to Mister Tee
I know schools like FSU & Clemson would only mean an overlap in the areas that already have SECN, but from a $$$ perspective, is there any upside (or none at all) having a few extra potential marquee matchups that could attract attention on a national level? Or does it not really amount to much, compared to getting some more SECN subscriptions? I seriously don't know one way or the other... anyone more knowledgeable have the answer to this?
Posted on 2/10/17 at 7:43 am to Mister Tee
1. Conference expansion is never about adding "good" programs. It's about money. Money in this day and age is about new TV markets. The South Carolina and Florida markets are already covered.
2. Current SEC programs don't want to add in-state programs.
3. Clemson's last 4-5 years have been quite excellent, but history says they are likely an anomaly. It's far more likely Clemson goes back to being a mediocre program than them staying an elite top 5 program, in the long run.
2. Current SEC programs don't want to add in-state programs.
3. Clemson's last 4-5 years have been quite excellent, but history says they are likely an anomaly. It's far more likely Clemson goes back to being a mediocre program than them staying an elite top 5 program, in the long run.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:08 am to Mister Tee
quote:
looking back.
The SEC is fricking clueless.
The SEC has enough football powerhouses. Adding more only takes away from the success of the elite teams the SEC already has.
Hell Spurrier going to South Carolina really fricked Tennessee over. UT probably would have ended up with some of their stars like Lattimore, Clowney, Alshon Jeffery, etc.
South Carolina has brought a good baseball program. And Arkansas brought a strong basketball program that has recently fallen on hard times
Posted on 2/10/17 at 8:25 am to Mister Tee
FSU had their chance. Bowden was a pussy.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News