Started By
Message
re: SEC Officials are freaking terrible
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:36 am to bmy
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:36 am to bmy
quote:
Hurts wasn't targeting he wasn't defenseless and the hit wasn't initiated with the crown of the helmet. There are two rules: one protects defenseless players; one protects all players. Neither occurred.
Now if the refs were truly for Bama they would have still thrown a flag for that play now wouldn't they? Especially considering that play led to Bama being down by 3 TDs.
0
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:36 am to bmy
quote:They aren't going to let you hit someone like that 40 yards behind the play.
On the strange unnecessary roughness call.. it probably shouldn't have been flagged at all.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:37 am to pvilleguru
Literally no calls went in Bama's favor. All calls favorited Ole Miss. Who blocked in the back on the punt return and bogus roughing the passer and pass interference on Bama.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:38 am to pvilleguru
He was actually trying to catch him after he ran into him. He fell on top of him didn't hit him at all lol.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:41 am to Under_Oath
quote:
Literally no calls went in Bama's favor. All calls favorited Ole Miss
Hurts fumble reversal was not in Bama's favor?? It was the right call but the call was a reversal and therefore in Bama's favor and that was a big one...
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:43 am to pvilleguru
quote:
Are you shitting me? The first point of contact was the crown of the defender's helmet to the facemask
There is an obvious and distinct difference between leading with the crown (or initiating contact with the crown) and the crown touching the facemask. Reality is that the hit was damn near perfect and the defenders face was put in the QBs chest.
Not an illegal hit.
LINK
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 10:48 am
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:48 am to bmy
quote:It would have been a perfect hit if it was 4 inches lower, but it wasn't. That is a penalty at least 9/10 times.
There is an obvious and distinct difference between leading with the crown (or initiating contact with the crown) and the crown touching the facemask. Reality is that the hit was damn near perfect and the defenders face was put in the QBs chest.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:49 am to TutHillTiger
Every fan considers their conference's officials terrible.
PAC officials are supposed to be the worst.
PAC officials are supposed to be the worst.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:49 am to bmy
Yeah, that picture clearly shows that he nailed the head first. Clear penalty.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:50 am to TutHillTiger
An L5U fan being a big baby about officiating.
Something new and different.
Something new and different.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 10:55 am to TutHillTiger
That Plains are Burning again and TutHill is ranting about refs at 2 am? Tut should be cranking a meeting with his old ATPB crew.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:03 am to pvilleguru
quote:
It would have been a perfect hit if it was 4 inches lower, but it wasn't. That is a penalty at least 9/10 times
No. Hurts was not a defenseless player and contact was not initiated with the crown of the helmet. See 9-1-3 and 9-1-4 in the rulebook.
The rule is split into two:
1) Targeting and making Forcible Contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless player
2) Targeting and making Forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 11:04 am
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:05 am to bmy
quote:You keep saying that, but you are still 100% wrong. I'm not even saying it was targeting, but it's still a 15 yard penalty for hitting the QB in the head.
contact was not initiated with the crown of the helmet
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:07 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
The dude lowered his helmet and lead with the crown of his head. Textbook.
Defender initiated contact with the front portion of his helmet and not the crown. Makes it legal.
The rule is to prevent hits like this. Facemask down = flag. Otherwise = no flag
LINK
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 11:09 am
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:08 am to pvilleguru
quote:
You keep saying that, but you are still 100% wrong. I'm not even saying it was targeting, but it's still a 15 yard penalty for hitting the QB in the head
There is no penalty for hitting a QB in the head unless he is defenseless or contact is initiated with the crown of the helmet.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:08 am to bmy
quote:Since when is the crown not the very top of the helmet? Because that's where the contact initiated.
Defender initiated contact with the front portion of his helmet and not the crown. Makes it legal.
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:08 am to bmy
quote:And that's what happened.
or contact is initiated with the crown of the helmet.
Come on, you're better than this.
This post was edited on 9/18/16 at 11:09 am
Posted on 9/18/16 at 11:10 am to pvilleguru
quote:
And that's what happened.
Come on, you're better than this
Not even close. Called correctly on the field. Player will be suspended for the next game (all hits like this are reviewed) if you are correct.
I guess we will see in a few days eh?
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News