Started By
Message
re: SEC Attrition Rates 2002-Present Day
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:03 pm to Monticello
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:03 pm to Monticello
quote:Yeah, sure, whatever you say. I'm clearly right about the flawed system.
Clearly AU being worst in the SEC in recruits who sign v. those who actually complete their eligibility is bothering you.
quote:As already stated, I'm glad Auburn is in the position to process players.
Especially since AU fans accused Bama of being some evil, cheating, processing demon for the last decade.
I can't fathom why this is so hard for you to understand.
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:07 pm to TTsTowel
I'm sorry your university has such a bad habit of oversigning and going after questionable kids who likely can't get eligible. If that's your strategy then fine. Just own it and quit griping about how it rightfully makes AU look bad.
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:08 pm to TTsTowel
You are back stroking over "facts". You guys love facts. Auburn attrition is horrid no matter how you try to spin it.
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:09 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
As already stated, I'm glad Auburn is in the position to process players.
I can't fathom why this is so hard for you to understand.
Because if I had the time to dig through your 66,000 posts, I guarantee I would find multiple instances of you bashing Alabama for oversigning and processing.
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:11 pm to Monticello
Don't know why any of you idiots care enough to argue this into the second page. You're just as dumb as TTs is at this point
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:12 pm to Monticello
quote:Oh, so you are mad about the hypothetical scenario involving me bashing Alabama in regards to over-signing. Therefore, you must find a way to turn the tables on Auburn and it's fans because you are butthurt about the past and you are choosing to completely ignore the evidence provided with the aforementioned flawed number system.
Because if I had the time to dig through your 66,000 posts, I guarantee I would find multiple instances of you bashing Alabama for oversigning and processing.
I understand. Continue.
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:13 pm to TheJones
And Dumber shows up. Don't get your feelings hurt.
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:17 pm to SavageOrangeJug
What's the attrition rates for all college freshmen at the SEC schools?
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:19 pm to Jake88
quote:
What's the attrition rates for all college freshmen at the SEC schools?
I'd be interested in knowing this + coach specific attrition rates of past and present coaches in that span. I'm too lazy to figure that out though
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:20 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
Therefore, you must find a way to turn the tables on Auburn and it's fans because you are butthurt
No, the statistics turned the tables for me. I enjoy witnessing your overzealous fanhood overcome your ability to accept reality.
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:21 pm to TTsTowel
So Auburn has the highest attrition rate? Or they keep signing kids who are too dumb to qualify for Auburn (I guess they can't fill out their names in those pesky ACT scantron bubbles)? Or is it both?
Either way it doesn't look good for Auburn. If non-qualifiers are a part of the criteria, and Auburn really doesn't have a high attrition rate, then they sign the most 'tards out of the Alabama special school system. You lose either way.
Either way it doesn't look good for Auburn. If non-qualifiers are a part of the criteria, and Auburn really doesn't have a high attrition rate, then they sign the most 'tards out of the Alabama special school system. You lose either way.
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:27 pm to Tooncesridesagain
quote:
So Auburn has the highest attrition rate? Or they keep signing kids who are too dumb to qualify for Auburn (I guess they can't fill out their names in those pesky ACT scantron bubbles)? Or is it both?
Either way it doesn't look good for Auburn. If non-qualifiers are a part of the criteria, and Auburn really doesn't have a high attrition rate, then they sign the most 'tards out of the Alabama special school system. You lose either way.
I'm guessing over 35% is the norm based on the data provided. Auburn takes several hits from this ranking for a variety of reasons. The 2010 class was decimated by attrition, anything from legal trouble to transfers, etc. Auburn probably has only had a handful of academic non qualifiers since 2009 so that's not really an issue. 45% is high, no matter how you slice it
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:29 pm to SavageOrangeJug
fla is damn near just as bad
50% of the #1 class in 2010
50% of the #1 class in 2010
This post was edited on 2/16/15 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:31 pm to gatortrav88
Is Florida's attrition attributed to staff turnover though? I think that's most understandable
Posted on 2/16/15 at 6:32 pm to nc14
quote:
You stay safe out there.
Will do. Is weather looking bad around your parts?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News