Started By
Message

re: Rick Barnes says SEC teams should be fined if they don't play 3 top 50 games OOC

Posted on 3/16/16 at 7:30 am to
Posted by 420centraltime
Gump nation
Member since Feb 2013
959 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 7:30 am to
quote:

4. Georgia
5. Florida
12. Kentucky
24. Alabama
25. Vanderbilt
39. Auburn
42. Texas A&M
51. Tennessee
70. Arkansas
162. Missouri
197. LSU
215. Mississippi State
271. South Carolina
297. Ole Miss


But all those consecutive 20 win seasons under Andy Kennedy!!! shite like this is killing the conference, even though Ole Miss might be a good team, if you end up losing to them it kills your RPI to the point of looking like a bad loss in when reality Ole Miss is a decent team.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51270 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 7:32 am to
A SEC-Big East challenge would be good for the league. I don't see the ACC-Big 10 challenge ending, but the Big East has good teams that would boost our league.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Rick Barnes 100% on point and for the love of God yes bring back the East/West scheduling.



Teams like Auburn can't convince good teams to do Home/Home with us . Also, I don't want to be stuck playing OM/MSU/Arky all the time
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Teams like Auburn can't convince good teams to do Home/Home with us . Also, I don't want to be stuck playing OM/MSU/Arky all the time


Pearl has gotten some good ones the last few years : Xavier, Colorado. He'll get some more. Scheduling won't be a problem at Auburn, Pearl loves big games.

Totally agree about East-West games.
Posted by Croot
Member since Aug 2013
4138 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 9:50 am to
*
This post was edited on 3/16/16 at 9:55 am
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17141 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 10:06 am to
quote:


Teams like Auburn can't convince good teams to do Home/Home with us . Also, I don't want to be stuck playing OM/MSU/Arky all the time
Of course you can't. Y'all can't even beat the cupcakes you're being criticized for scheduling. Walk before you run.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 10:16 am to
quote:

As someone else stated, that ranking is a bit misleading.

This is not a notable OOC schedule for a power 5 team with NCAA tournament aspirations.


That's fair, though evaluating our SOS over the past 4-5 seasons (in the spinoff thread) we still come in top 4 in the conference. If I eliminate this year's schedule from that all together we move from 93rd over that time span to 115th, which is still good for 6th best.

There are 2 methods of having a higher SOS. 1 is scheduling a ton of teams in the 50-150 range (eliminates the hit to SOS for 200+ RPI teams) *or* having sufficient 1-50 teams to offset some of the easier 150+ matchups. I agree that by and large, besides the Auburn loss, one of the main reasons why UGA was not really in consideration for the tourney was lack of quality (top 50 wins). Ultimately, I think more top 50 opponents would have only served to expose that this team was really bubble at best due to inconsistency and depth, but hopefully we'll be evaluating that with our schedule going forward.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25854 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 12:38 pm to
Maybe he should worry more about winning conference games first
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 12:40 pm to
I mean, it's a pretty deep schedule

Power-5 teams
@ Seton Hall (#19)
vs K-State (#91)
vs Georgia Tech (#69)
vs Clemson (#129)
@ Baylor (#26)

Consistently Good Mid-Majors
vs Chattanooga (#52)
vs Murray State (#170)
vs Oakland (#116)
vs Winthrop (#131)

And on top of that High Point (#153) was pretty good this year.

The only bad team UGA played was Robert Morris.
This post was edited on 3/16/16 at 12:43 pm
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Of course you can't. Y'all can't even beat the cupcakes you're being criticized for scheduling


Auburn's schedule the last 2 years has been just fine
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79160 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

vs. Armstrong State
vs. Chattanooga
vs. Murray State
vs. High Point
at Seton Hall
vs. Oakland
vs. Kansas State
vs. Winthrop
vs. Georgia Tech
vs. Clemson
vs. Robert Morris
at Baylor



Frankly I think UGA's OOC is perfectly fine if they swap 2 of the exhibition type opponents with regular cupcakes.

Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Frankly I think UGA's OOC is perfectly fine if they swap 2 of the exhibition type opponents with regular cupcakes.


Yea, I see no problem with it. 5 P5 games against semi-decent to pretty good teams. 4 mid-major games against solid Top 200 RPI teams.
Posted by Cure
Fayettenam
Member since Jan 2013
40 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 1:11 pm to
I agree with Barnes. If the SEC wants to be competitive from top to bottom, they'll certainly need to address it with scheduling some tougher OOC games.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter