Started By
Message
re: Returning SEC running backs against SEC Competition & Ranked teams
Posted on 5/30/15 at 10:20 pm to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 5/30/15 at 10:20 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
I'm not sure why you're so angry about my response.
You think I'm angry. You are really delicate.
quote:
Nobody could live up to his initial hype. It's unfortunate that LSU fans perpetuated it.
And Rivals, 247sports, ESPN, Scout.
quote:
Why are you trying to make this a pissing contest about Bama?
Because you seem oh-so-content to flame the discussion in the direction of Chubb vs. LF when most LSU fans have already complimented the phenomenal year that he had. The problem here is if LSU fans dare say they still believe in LF and his potential they are mocked and ridiculed. When he blows up this year this board will be flooded with stats. If Chubb doens't build on his great freshman year it will be amusing to watch the excuses by all here who have mocked LF all off-season.
quote:
Mark Ingram came in ranked a 3* by Scout and a 4* by rivals. Completely irrelevant comparison.
My point about Mark was that he went on to have 1600+ yards and won the Heisman. do you really think LF won't get up to those type of numbers if he stays healthy?
quote:
But for what it's worth, Derrick Henry was better than Fournette in every single measurable category vs SEC competition.
On this one I'll go to bat for LF. DH is a huge pussy and I wouldn't want that big soft scat back on my team. It's not a pissing match. It's my opinion.
2
Posted on 5/30/15 at 10:29 pm to BlackCloud
Neat.
Posted on 5/30/15 at 10:33 pm to Tuscaloosa
This thread is still going? I hope Jay d and black cloud have slept since it started.
Posted on 5/30/15 at 11:00 pm to WDE24
quote:
This thread is still going? I hope Jay d and black cloud have slept since it started.
I was seriously worried about Jay yesterday
Posted on 5/30/15 at 11:04 pm to WDE24
quote:
This thread is still going? I hope Jay d and black cloud have slept since it started.
Davis is still a fatass!
Posted on 5/30/15 at 11:06 pm to BlackCloud
Some more stats:
Chubb - 10.75*
LF7 - 6.25*
*length of cock
Chubb - 10.75*
LF7 - 6.25*
*length of cock
Posted on 5/30/15 at 11:31 pm to dbeck
quote:
Some more stats: Chubb - 10.75* LF7 - 6.25* *length of cock
There we go. The definitive stat from someone who has seen both up close.
Posted on 5/31/15 at 1:05 am to BamaNixon
That's just the difference I could feel after your mom was with both of them.
Posted on 5/31/15 at 1:13 am to dbeck
quote:
That's just the difference I could feel after your mom was with both of them.
I have two dads.
Posted on 5/31/15 at 6:30 am to wadewilson
The only problem I have with most LSU fans saying he has more potential is that almost all the the reasons they list are bunk. They are typical fans who know a ton about their guy but very little about the other one. The only one I can agree with is LF will get fewer carries so he'll be fresher for the NFL.
Posted on 5/31/15 at 11:58 am to Porter Osborne Jr
Yea, how does LF have more potential?
Posted on 5/31/15 at 1:23 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Yeah, you're just proving my point.
Posted on 5/31/15 at 1:28 pm to Swoopin
quote:
LSU fans bout to be triggered
Tuscaloosa was triggered. It was the reason for this thread.
Posted on 5/31/15 at 1:40 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
Tuscaloosa was triggered. It was the reason for this thread.
What exactly was the reason for this thread and at what point was I "triggered"?
I just posted the stats of all returning RB in the SEC.
Why do you people hate threads with actual information in them?
Posted on 5/31/15 at 1:44 pm to wadewilson
quote:
If stats are the only thing that determines talent, then LF will never satisfy some of you.
How would you determine the better back?
quote:
I'm more interested in looking back at these three in a couple years, after their college careers are done and they've been drafted.
That certainly is a doable thing, but then you would not be comparing who the better college football back is. You would be determining who the better NFL back is. The OP clearly says Chubb is the better back in the conference. College.
Posted on 5/31/15 at 1:50 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Why do you people hate threads with actual information in them?
Because there is no stat measuring LF's enormous potential. Which makes all your silly stats meaningless dummy.
Posted on 5/31/15 at 1:55 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Yeah, you're just proving my point.
What point is that? That if a running back gets fewer carries then he is obviously the better back?
Posted on 5/31/15 at 2:11 pm to wadewilson
So then give me some legit reasons.
Posted on 5/31/15 at 3:10 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Nick Chubb (UGA) - 6.66
Damnit Richt, why did you turn to the dark side? Is that elusive national championship that important to you?!
Posted on 5/31/15 at 4:45 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
My ninja.
Page 11 of 12
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News