Started By
Message

re: Ranking the SEC schools academically?

Posted on 1/3/13 at 11:28 am to
Posted by lightbulbz
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2012
908 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 11:28 am to
I hate general rankings. They're by and large worthless. Get a degree in what you want where you want if you can afford it. If you can't really afford a degree, then get it in something that is worth a shite somewhere that is close.
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 11:31 am to
I have worked at a company where I held more seniority than two Aggies who were both older than me.

I worked under a UF grad, an LSU grad, and a Texas grad, but they were all at least 15 years my senior.

I've never worked with anybody from any other SEC school that I know of.

I have had sex with alums of South Carolina and Texas A&M.

Posted by JDM1992
In your head
Member since Dec 2011
15141 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 11:33 am to
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 2:08 pm
Posted by LandofDixie
Member since Jul 2012
2825 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 11:36 am to
That's what I don't get. Ranking universities as a sum of parts is fricking worthless at this scale. There's not enough difference to matter in any meaningful way. I'm in architecture at Auburn and I only care about how good that program is. Vandy doesn't have an architecture program, why should I care where Auburn as a whole is ranked in comparison?
Posted by LandofDixie
Member since Jul 2012
2825 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 11:37 am to
That's what I don't get. Ranking universities as a sum of parts is fricking worthless at this scale. There's not enough difference to matter in any meaningful way. I'm in architecture at Auburn and I only care about how good that program is. Vandy doesn't have an architecture program, why should I care where Auburn as a whole is ranked in comparison?
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 11:40 am to
Yeah, thats a good point. I did business at Arkansas, and its a very good business school. Arkansas has a great architecture program, too.

Our law school probably sucks nationally, but if you are going to practice law in the state of Arkansas, then its the one you want to be in.
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8714 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 11:50 am to
It's easy to get National Merit Scholars to go to your school, you just pay them. OU is doing the same thing, they literally pay those kids so much in scholarships they are making a nice income to go there and thus be able to throw out the nice stat. If you think a National Merit Scholar from California really is choosing Bama or OU over Stanford and UC Berkeley because of educational value you are smoking something. It's a smart strategy to get some academic cred because it is a lot easier than getting an extra hundred mill a year in research dollars.

Baylor actually takes the cake in "gaming" the system though. They actually pay their students to retake SAT's after admission and reward them for getting higher scores so they can boost their stats.

Posted by SEC. 593
Chicago
Member since Aug 2012
4042 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 11:58 am to
US News is a horrible way to rank schools academically, since they use non-academic factors in their rankings, and nobody but parents of high-school senors takes it seriously.

If I had to rank
Vandy
aTm
UF
Mizzou
Georgia
.
Alabama
Auburn
.
.
The rest

Posted by CHSgc
Charleston, SC
Member since Oct 2012
1658 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:03 pm to
It's Vanderbilt and everyone else.

Most SEC schools are BY DESIGN meant to provide an educated workforce for their own state first w/ some regional consideration. Arguments over whether Arkansas is better than Tenn are a joke b/c unless you're applying for a job w/in those states or the HR person taking a look at your app is an alum the person isn't going to assign any greater weight to your education. So UGA grads will have a leg up in ATL, Bama in Birmingham, but neither gets special consideration applying for jobs in NYC.

There are minor differences b/w programs at certain schools (USC has #1 Int'l Biz program in world) but these do not make an appreciable difference on public perception of the school (and shouldn't, b/c the majority of your school's grads don't get a degree in your one or two first class programs).
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
21958 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Is Bama experiencing the same thing?


Over half of the undergraduate population is from out of state.

Source: Anecdotal, Professors at UA.
Posted by hiltacular
NYC
Member since Jan 2011
19672 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

So UGA grads will have a leg up in ATL, Bama in Birmingham, but neither gets special consideration applying for jobs in NYC.


Define special consideration? Anyone hiring a business grad will know that UGA has a better program than bama. Now whether or not that lands them the job is based on about 50 other variables.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28049 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

according to this Top Schools in the world

Vandy, Florida, Texas A&M, UGA, UK, Missouri, USCe, Auburn, and Arkansas


typical, List, where they go by names.

There is no way, Wash U, in STL is in the 30's, many of those schools are ranked on name.

Posted by CHSgc
Charleston, SC
Member since Oct 2012
1658 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:27 pm to
The special consideration is alum-based. ATL is the largest city in GA. It attracts a significant number of UGA grads. All else being equal, a person submitting an app from Arkansas will find it tougher sledding than a person submitting an app from UGA. Granted, the Arkansas person could target a business that is comprised of out of state grads or Arkansas grads, but in general the UGA grad will have an easier time.
Posted by LandofDixie
Member since Jul 2012
2825 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:28 pm to
I talked to a buddy who goes in the Honors College at Bama and he said the same thing. It apparently always happens after Bama football hits a really good streak, but he was expressing concern about how there's a widening gap between what he saw as the strong academic out-of-state folks and the in-state folks who fail out after a year.
Posted by elvisleft
Member since Sep 2012
518 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:49 pm to
Dude, WashU is fantastic. Every bit the peer of Vanderbilt and Emory, almost at Northwestern/Duke level.
Posted by CHSgc
Charleston, SC
Member since Oct 2012
1658 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:51 pm to
^ Co-signed. Excellent school.
Posted by MetryTyger
Metro NOLA, LA
Member since Jan 2004
15587 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

SEC. 593
Ranking the SEC schools academically?

US News is a horrible way to rank schools academically, since they use non-academic factors in their rankings, and nobody but parents of high-school senors takes it seriously.

If I had to rank
Vandy
aTm
UF
Mizzou
Georgia
.
Alabama
Auburn
.
.
The rest



And nobody takes your list seriously either cap.
I notice you made sure to put Missouri in your upper echelon.
It's obvious you don't know a blessed thing about the rest of the SEC universities.
Posted by 15sammy34
Auburn, AL
Member since Oct 2011
16137 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

I was speaking with my Mother last night--she's a former professor at Alabama. She told me that according to some of her friends that still teach at U of A the University is larger than its ever been, more than half of the students are from out of state, professors have received a raise every year for the last four years where other schools in state have not granted a school-wide raise in five. To say revenue is up at the University of Alabama would be an understatement.


And I was told by a well off alumni that they've grown the size of the undergraduate classes too quickly by accepting students with marginal test scores and grades in what basically amounts to a money grab. The average ACT score for an entering UA freshmen is 22. At Auburn it's a 27. TIFIW
Posted by 15sammy34
Auburn, AL
Member since Oct 2011
16137 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

I hate general rankings. They're by and large worthless. Get a degree in what you want where you want if you can afford it. If you can't really afford a degree, then get it in something that is worth a shite somewhere that is close.


This is absolutely right, but it's always fun to argue in these threads.
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8714 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 1:07 pm to
Mizzou gets the "upper echelon" cred because of the AAU status. Fair or unfair, the AAU is considered the gold standard of "Tier 1" status. There are a few elite private schools that are Tier 1 and Non AAU (Notre Dame, Wake Forest, etc.) but that is because they put no emphasis on research.

I also completely agree that most of this stuff is meaningless to the average grad. It comes in to play if you are applying for grad school or for jobs out of state or with prominent companies. In the end though you can get a great education at any school and the mission of a lot of these schools is about serving their state and not academic rankings.

The reason schools care about this stuff though is money. A higher rated school gets more research dollars. AAU membership means more research dollars. Research dollars equals jobs.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter