Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:34 pm to Hogwall Jackson
All in your head I see. 
And yes. They've won the SEC before. I'm only 32.
And yes. They've won the SEC before. I'm only 32.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:42 pm to KajunGator
quote:
Well...seeing as how they were already the SEC champs in many of our lifetimes (1976), I would say it's possible.
Buncha old farts up in this piece
Posted on 5/15/14 at 8:44 pm to Stonehog
Yes
Posted on 5/15/14 at 9:00 pm to KajunGator
quote:
Poll: Will Kentucky ever win the East in our lifetimes?
Well...seeing as how they were already the SEC champs in many of our lifetimes (1976), I would say it's possible.
Fail.... UGA was the SEC champion in 1976 I looked it up.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 9:02 pm to silverdawg
Co-champs
Posted on 5/15/14 at 9:08 pm to BluegrassBelle
What the hell. Yes
Posted on 5/15/14 at 9:57 pm to Mizzou4ever
At the end of business hours, the No's have it.
Thanks to everyone for voting.
Thanks to everyone for voting.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 10:47 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Yes. Hell, they won ten games in 2007. At some point the marbles will fall once in 70 years.
Posted on 5/15/14 at 10:55 pm to House_of Cards
Kentucky will never be relevant
Posted on 5/15/14 at 10:59 pm to House_of Cards
Yes. Right coach who can get that fan base truly thinking football. Two schools I don't understand in football are Kentucky and North Carolina.
Both states have good high school football programs and the aforementioned schools are the biggest name in their respective states.
Plus Lexington is beautiful. It's my favorite road trip. The Cats are remodeling and that should help.
But the total basketball emphasis must share.
And the most important thing: to win either SEC division, a team normally has to have 60-70 ballplayers. Kentucky has maybe 50.
Can it be done? Without question. Will it happen is simply unanswerable.
Both states have good high school football programs and the aforementioned schools are the biggest name in their respective states.
Plus Lexington is beautiful. It's my favorite road trip. The Cats are remodeling and that should help.
But the total basketball emphasis must share.
And the most important thing: to win either SEC division, a team normally has to have 60-70 ballplayers. Kentucky has maybe 50.
Can it be done? Without question. Will it happen is simply unanswerable.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 9:14 am to CocknDawg
quote:
Both states have good high school football programs and the aforementioned schools are the biggest name in their respective states.
Louisville is a bigger football name than Kentucky.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 9:19 am to Stonehog
and they make good bats
Posted on 5/16/14 at 9:23 am to MIZ_COU
quote:
Kentucky will never be relevant
quote:
MIZ_COU
Said the Missouri Fan
Posted on 5/16/14 at 9:25 am to Stonehog
Yes.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 9:25 am to silverdawg
Yes.
UK was co-champ with Alabama in 1977, not 1976. I was a freshman. Won the NCAA in basketball that year also. Pretty damn good freshman year.
And yes, I am old as frick.
UK was co-champ with Alabama in 1977, not 1976. I was a freshman. Won the NCAA in basketball that year also. Pretty damn good freshman year.
And yes, I am old as frick.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 9:41 am to Stonehog
Recently, yes. But Kentucky does have some tradition under Bear and then Claiborne (sp).
Posted on 5/16/14 at 9:50 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Said the Missouri Fan
Missouri just did something that Kentucky hasn't done in program history.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 9:54 am to CocknDawg
quote:Outside of St. X, Trinity, Male/Manual, and Highlands high school football generally stinks. Those are the programs that crank out DI players. You can't rely on 4-5 high schools to support one program let alone 2.
Both states have good high school football programs and the aforementioned schools are the biggest name in their respective states.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 10:16 am to Stonehog
quote:
Stonehog
Why are you so obsessed with Kentucky football?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News