Started By
Message
re: OFFICIAL: Ole Miss responds to NCAA allegations
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:36 pm to reboil
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:36 pm to reboil
quote:
Also, we requested to interview both Mullen and Leo together but the committee and Mullen both denied that request.
Almost credible until this statement. Why in the blue hell would OM ever think about interviewing Dan Mullen?
1
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:37 pm to Vecchio Cane
Check mate lol
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:37 pm to olemissfan26
quote:
Yes because not pushing back against the NCAA has worked well for us so far...
I'm not sure pushing back has ever worked for anyone. The NCAA isn't a court of law and has a well-known history of vengeful response to resistance.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:37 pm to reboil
Leo Lewis is not on your football team. why would OM be there?
and student athlete -39
there are more than 38 people in question regarding their recruiting? someone please interpret
and student athlete -39
there are more than 38 people in question regarding their recruiting? someone please interpret
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:37 pm to BobLeeDagger
Lol someone anchored this thread. tNetwork doin work
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:37 pm to reboil
quote:
Leo is "Student Athlete 39" and he was interviewed three times. First he was interviewed without OM knowledge or OM being present. (This is a no-no according to by-laws) This information was withheld for weeks and then told to us. We requested to cross examine him or be present at the second interview of Leo (which seems to have been granted) but Leo's counsel advised him not to respond to any of the questions and the NCAA did not make him answer. (He pleaded the 5th basically) Lastly, Ole Miss was not allowed to sit in on his third interview or even listen to his statements.
Also, we requested to interview both Mullen and Leo together but the committee and Mullen both denied that request.
This is pretty much bullshite by the NCAA investigative arm. Anxious to see how the COI responds to these tactics.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:40 pm to yatesdog38
Just scanning through but I see a good bit of Farrar scapegoating.
Some of the rebuttals are weak on content and rely heavily on semantics.
Some of the rebuttals are weak on content and rely heavily on semantics.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:42 pm to Crowknowsbest
Honestly, OM is only challenging 1/3 of the allegations.
So, how do you deny LOIC or Failure to Monitor when your admitting to 14-15 allegations made by the COI?
This is better than we could have dreamed
So, how do you deny LOIC or Failure to Monitor when your admitting to 14-15 allegations made by the COI?
This is better than we could have dreamed
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:46 pm to GreyReb
quote:
This is pretty much bull shite by the NCAA investigative arm. Anxious to see how the COI responds to these tactics.
What is bullshite is what he wrote. Its not a court of law, Ole Miss does not have the right to interview witnesses.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:48 pm to StopRobot
OM cheated.
They got caught.
Why not just. Take their medicine like men?
They got caught.
Why not just. Take their medicine like men?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:49 pm to BobLeeDagger
The NCAA has enough in the original NOA to hammer OM as much as they want (30+ scholarships, 3+ years bowl bans). However, they didn't put LOIC in the original, so it would be difficult to hit Freeze with a show cause without the new allegations.
So it was smart for OM to say 'LOIC wasn't in the original so you can't say it now if you can't prove the new allegations'. It may not work, though. The NCAA can do what they want and don't need proof.
So it was smart for OM to say 'LOIC wasn't in the original so you can't say it now if you can't prove the new allegations'. It may not work, though. The NCAA can do what they want and don't need proof.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:50 pm to reboil
quote:
Leo is "Student Athlete 39"
Link?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:54 pm to BobLeeDagger
quote:
Lol someone anchored this thread. tNetwork doin work
LewDawg told you on the first page why you got anchored.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 3:03 pm to BluegrassBelle
Blind link? Jeez, how more clear do I have to be in thread title...
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 6/6/17 at 3:08 pm to BobLeeDagger
Go put some quotes from the response
Posted on 6/6/17 at 3:09 pm to BobLeeDagger
Gotta give the folks some kind of detail or you'll get anchored.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 3:09 pm to BluegrassBelle
Edited
Posted on 6/6/17 at 3:11 pm to Vecchio Cane
"The University has concluded that significant violations occurred in connection with its football program over a period of years, INCLUDING DURING THIS INVESTIGATION. "
But there was no LOIC.
But there was no LOIC.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 3:21 pm to BobLeeDagger
quote:
Jeez, how more clear do I have to be in thread title...
No shite
I guess you're supposed to include all the words of the 125 page document in there.Posted on 6/6/17 at 3:36 pm to piggilicious
Ole Miss is going to get absolutely hammered. Farrar is pissed now and will tell the NCAA whatever they want to hear.
Basically Ole Miss is thumbing their nose at the NCAA with this response.
Say good night rebels.
Basically Ole Miss is thumbing their nose at the NCAA with this response.
Say good night rebels.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News