Started By
Message
OFFICIAL: Ole Miss responds to NCAA allegations
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:09 pm
Ole Miss Response
Scout.com
Scout.com
quote:
As stated in February when the Notice of Allegations was issued, we have cooperated fully with the NCAA enforcement staff over the more than four-year-long process. The university has concluded several violations of NCAA bylaws occurred, and we have taken responsibility for those violations. We have self-imposed significant sanctions on our football program including a postseason ban for the 2017 season, a reduction in available scholarships and recruiting days, and an $8 million forfeiture of SEC postseason revenue. Although we agree several violations occurred, we do not agree that credible and persuasive evidence supports all of the allegations in the Notice. Our Response details our position on each allegation, and we look forward to appearing before the Committee on Infractions.
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 3:10 pm
21
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:11 pm to BobLeeDagger
Great link 
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:11 pm to fillmoregandt
Edited
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:11 pm to BobLeeDagger
In just to be in. 
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:12 pm to BobLeeDagger
Ole Miss response summarized:
1. We did no wrong
2. Fake News
3. Frick black people
4. Women's basketball coach something something lost to a team that lost to South Alabama
1. We did no wrong
2. Fake News
3. Frick black people
4. Women's basketball coach something something lost to a team that lost to South Alabama
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:15 pm to fillmoregandt
interweb traffic has it locked down. good job for being so stupid and your university having shitty servers
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:16 pm to BobLeeDagger
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:16 pm to BobLeeDagger
In
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:16 pm to yatesdog38
Here you go
LINK
LINK
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:17 pm to BobLeeDagger
Anchored due to blind link
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:18 pm to BobLeeDagger
First page?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:18 pm to BobLeeDagger
In
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:18 pm to MadDoggyStyle
You're gonna need more than just the first page lol
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:19 pm to BobLeeDagger
They are fighting the lack of institutional control charge. Ruh roh
quote:
Yet, there are instances in which the University disagrees with the enforcement staff’s interpretation of the evidence or its sufficiency. Most importantly, the University contests the allegations concerning institutional control and head coach responsibility (Allegations Nos. 20-21).
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:20 pm to LewDawg
I went straight to both links, but I'll wait for someone to read 125 pages and give us the juicy details
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:20 pm to BobLeeDagger
quote:
Although we agree several violations occurred, we do not agree that credible and persuasive evidence supports all of the allegations in the Notice.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:21 pm to BobLeeDagger
Can someone give me a summary of what has been found against Ole Miss? What exactly did they do that the NCAA is looking at. I really have not followed this story
TIA
TIA
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:21 pm to BobLeeDagger
in
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:21 pm to BobLeeDagger
quote:
The University has also concluded that Allegations Nos. 9, Allegation 12, 14-(e)-(g), Allegation 15 and Allegations 16-(b)-(c) either lack the sufficient level of credible and persuasive support necessary for the Committee to find a violation under the Bylaw 19.7.8.3 evidentiary standard or are contradicted by the objective and verifiable evidence. As with the institutional control and head coach responsibility allegations, the decision to contest these charges was not taken lightly. These allegations, however, rely almost exclusively on testimony from [Student-Athlete 39], a former University recruit and current [Institution 10] student- athlete, whose testimony was, at best, incomplete and inconsistent. In critical part, [Student-Athlete 39’s] testimony was either contradicted or not corroborated by his friends and family and, in several instances, refuted by objective facts. Nevertheless, the enforcement staff, and thus the Notice, embrace all of [Student- Athlete 39’s] accusations.1
Posted on 6/6/17 at 2:21 pm to texag7
quote:
They are fighting the lack of institutional control charge. Ruh roh
I'm no expert, but that doesn't seem like a great idea.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News