Started By
Message
re: Off season minutia - top 10 teams each decade - how many times is your team in??
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:34 pm to AA7
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:34 pm to AA7
quote:
Believe it or not Vandy was legit a long, long time ago.
Funny you say that. Vandy has an overall winning record vs......guess who
Nope
Nah
Try again
Not quite
Give up????
Auburn University
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:42 pm to dcbl
quote:
Something seems off about these percentages
Bama should be below Army that decade as well, someone at SB Nation bleeds crimson maybe???
Did you even read the article you copied? It's not winning %, it's average percentile rank (where the team finished every year relative to everyone else).
Posted on 6/14/16 at 8:54 pm to Evolved Simian
quote:
Did you even read the article you copied? It's not winning %, it's average percentile rank (where the team finished every year relative to everyone else).
not with a critical eye TBH
mostly skimmed it and looked at who was on it & how many times
Posted on 6/14/16 at 9:07 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:Great observation, genius.
Something seems off about these percentages
Posted on 6/14/16 at 9:15 pm to dcbl
A&M went 94-28-2 in the 90's. A win pct. of .766 which was better than Notre Dame (.707), Michigan (.762), Ohio State (.739), and Colorado (.741) during that same timespan.
Not only that, but A&M wasn't eligible for a postseason ranking in the 1994 season due to probation. That team went 10-0-1. 1993 Auburn was in the same boat and they went 11-0.
Not only that, but A&M wasn't eligible for a postseason ranking in the 1994 season due to probation. That team went 10-0-1. 1993 Auburn was in the same boat and they went 11-0.
This post was edited on 6/14/16 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 6/14/16 at 9:22 pm to dcbl
It's pretty easy to see Oklahoma and alabamas dominance when you look at it this way. Nebraska and tOSU as well.
Posted on 6/14/16 at 9:38 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
A&M went 94-28-2 in the 90's. A win pct. of .766 which was better than Notre Dame (.707), Michigan (.762), Ohio State (.739), and Colorado (.741) during that same timespan.
Not only that, but A&M wasn't eligible for a postseason ranking in the 1994 season due to probation. That team went 10-0-1. 1993 Auburn was in the same boat and they went 11-0.
I stand corrected
Posted on 6/14/16 at 9:39 pm to dcbl
quote:
there was no SEC...
Oh.... Well what I said doesn't make sense then
Carry on
Posted on 6/14/16 at 10:06 pm to dcbl
math is wrong on Ole Miss and Penn State in the 60's
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News