Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/2/16 at 3:18 pm to joshua2571
quote:
Since Mullen has finished above Ole Miss 6 out of his 8 years in the conference standings, Ole Miss needs to go to the SWAC asap.
Dude's been 5th or tied for 5th 5 out of 8 years.
He is 60-42 total, but only 29-35 in conference.
I realize the Egg Bowl Win has reignited the rebsession, but this thread isn't about Ole Miss or our craptastic year, this is about Mullen's coaching prowess. Maybe today he's second best, but if so, our conference is kind of weak. If you want to pull the "does the most with the least card," I'm going Mason all day. Maybe even Stoops. If you van win at Kentucky or Vandy, you've really done something imo. Mullen is great at quarterbacks no doubt, but second best overall? The Sun Belt disagrees.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:14 pm to skirpnasty
I think we can all agree State has become QBU.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:17 pm to GoRebsGo!
55-20 shitweasel.
Roll damn
Roll damn
This post was edited on 12/2/16 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:21 pm to GoRebsGo!
Did you really just say Mason and stoops are 2 of the best coachs in the conference?
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:42 pm to Hailstate8
Yep. Mullen gets solid 3 star diamonds and State cares about football. Kentucky is all b-ball, and Vandy cares more about baseball and academics. Stoops is a stretch, but I would take Mason over Mullen as a total package. I'll say this, Mason's guys play hard for 4 quarters every game. Can't say that for everyone. I'd take Mason over Mullen as a total package. I'll say this, Mason's guys play hard for 4 quarters every game. Can't say that for most.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:52 pm to BulldogXero
quote:
The original statement was QBS will not be a problem under Mullen not QB recruiting
So you think that QBs recruited for a Croom offense have no impact on how a QB performs in a Mullen offense?
I would imagine I'm in the majority thinking that Mullen got more production out of the Croom QB recruits than we could have rightly expected.
I believe we shouldn't be too worried about QBs going forward because Dan will continue to recruit better QBs like Key and develop the ones that don't have 'stars' but fit his system like Fitz.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 11:26 am to GoRebsGo!
quote:
Yep. Mullen gets solid 3 star diamonds and State cares about football. Kentucky is all b-ball, and Vandy cares more about baseball and academics. Stoops is a stretch, but I would take Mason over Mullen as a total package. I'll say this, Mason's guys play hard for 4 quarters every game. Can't say that for everyone. I'd take Mason over Mullen as a total package. I'll say this, Mason's guys play hard for 4 quarters every game. Can't say that for most.
You wanna "say this" one more time? We didn't understand the first time.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News