Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/9/13 at 8:03 pm to Patton
quote:
I have no clue what I just read but am pretty sure it was pointless and ill conceived.
Maybe you can translate what I said into Gump Speak.
Posted on 6/9/13 at 8:06 pm to monsterballads
The easiest and best solution is to allow Bama/Tenn and Aub/Georgia games to be counted as out of conference games in the years they aren't on the official SEC schedule. Then play a true rotating schedule that is fair to everyone. No permanent rivals.
Even LSU/Florida could go that route.
Even LSU/Florida could go that route.
Posted on 6/9/13 at 8:08 pm to Sheetbend
Hey Ohio state fan.
Posted on 6/9/13 at 8:20 pm to Sheetbend
I never said that
Posted on 6/9/13 at 9:27 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Move Auburn to The East and let Mizzou be in The West, and rotate out all cross divisional games.
Florida and Georgia would still be the dominate recruiting programs in the East with USCar and Auburn fighting it out for third.
Alabama, TAM, and LSU would still be the dominate recruiting programs in the West, with the rest fighting it out to reach 2nd. tier status.
Bama and Tennessee can play as an OOC game if the Vols insist on being a sacrificial lamb for reasons their fan base can only understand.
Talk about a grudge match with Auburn and Bama in the SEC C.G.--Wow!
Posted on 6/9/13 at 9:38 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
Move Auburn to The East and let Mizzou be in The West, and rotate out all cross divisional games.
Whenever U want you, all U have to do is
Drea-ea-ea-ea-eam, dream, dream, dream
Posted on 6/9/13 at 9:51 pm to crimsonsaint
Self-serving agendas are in full control of the SEC--no doubt of that. 
I see LSU asking for a fair chance at divisional titles with the same rules for all, with TAM and USCar seconding LSU's motion.
However, I see Kentucky, Vanderbilt, and Missouri hiding from Bama, LSU, and TAM, while Ole Miss, Miss. St., and Arkansas are, hiding from Florida and Georgia.
I see Bama and Georgia enjoying their respective scheduling advantage against LSU and Florida and wanting that advantage to last as long as possible.
A fair scheduling format in football competition is not an SEC priority at the present; rigging the rules is the priority!
Gaining and maintaining a competitive advantage through manipulating non-divisional schedules is now a proud tradition in the SEC.
That sneaky bridge schedule in 2012 allowed Bama to steal an SEC West divisional title last year from TAM, and the individuals in control of scheduling are at it again.
Making LSU play USC last year and Georgia this year along with Florida as the permanent opponent, just about killed any changes LSU might have had for the West title--Nice Job!
But whoever said the SEC and fairness have anything to do with each other--nobody.
I see LSU asking for a fair chance at divisional titles with the same rules for all, with TAM and USCar seconding LSU's motion.
However, I see Kentucky, Vanderbilt, and Missouri hiding from Bama, LSU, and TAM, while Ole Miss, Miss. St., and Arkansas are, hiding from Florida and Georgia.
I see Bama and Georgia enjoying their respective scheduling advantage against LSU and Florida and wanting that advantage to last as long as possible.
A fair scheduling format in football competition is not an SEC priority at the present; rigging the rules is the priority!
Gaining and maintaining a competitive advantage through manipulating non-divisional schedules is now a proud tradition in the SEC.
That sneaky bridge schedule in 2012 allowed Bama to steal an SEC West divisional title last year from TAM, and the individuals in control of scheduling are at it again.
Making LSU play USC last year and Georgia this year along with Florida as the permanent opponent, just about killed any changes LSU might have had for the West title--Nice Job!
But whoever said the SEC and fairness have anything to do with each other--nobody.
This post was edited on 6/9/13 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 6/9/13 at 10:18 pm to monsterballads
quote:
There wouldn't be any cross Division permanent opponents
We also want to play LSU though. Yeah we'd rather keep the Iron Bowl and the TSIO, but just simply going to a nine game SEC schedule fixes that, and that's what is best for the fans.
Posted on 6/9/13 at 10:32 pm to ChEgrad
quote:
No permanent rivals.
Even LSU/Florida could go that route.
did it really take five pages til we got an LSU fan to finally post about wanting out of playing a real game? certainly I overlooked the others.
LSU fans would not be happy until they can play one conference game a year against Mississippi State and 11 in state games.
Posted on 6/9/13 at 10:54 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
Self-serving agendas are in full control of the SEC--no doubt of that.
Sorry that UA & UT won't give up a rivalry game played since 1901, and UG & AU since 1892, just so LSU won't have to play Florida every year. Maybe LSU officials can talk to MS or OM officials about swapping cross division opponents. Would LSU be happy playing Kentucky or Vandy yearly?
Posted on 6/9/13 at 10:58 pm to East Coast Band
Bama fans fully understand they only play Florida half as often as LSU and want to keep it that way.
Fair scheduling rules is not something we should even discuss.
Fair scheduling rules is not something we should even discuss.
Posted on 6/9/13 at 11:00 pm to Sheetbend
It's literally the only thing you discuss
Posted on 6/9/13 at 11:06 pm to Patton
The unfairness in SEC scheduling is not about me; its about the integrity of the SEC and college football. 
Posted on 6/9/13 at 11:07 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
Sheetbend
This guy.... THIS GUY..
THIS GUY!
This post was edited on 6/9/13 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 6/9/13 at 11:09 pm to harmonics
Posted on 6/9/13 at 11:09 pm to Sheetbend
Always trolling. just stahp
Posted on 6/9/13 at 11:09 pm to Sheetbend
The integrity of the SEC is doing just fine. Go find a Big 10 board and try to fix their weak arse league.
Posted on 6/9/13 at 11:10 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
integrity
And this coming from an ohio state fan is just comical
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News