Started By
Message
Michael Dyer was down
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:20 pm
.
11
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:21 pm to Cigars Beer Boobs
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:22 pm to OneMoreVol
COOL
STORY
BRO
STORY
BRO
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:22 pm to Cigars Beer Boobs
and your point is...
the game is over..it doesnt matter..
the game is over..it doesnt matter..
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:23 pm to Cigars Beer Boobs
And Bo didn't break the plane in '82.
Oh, and Curtis Brown had possession in '95.
I'm sure if you lobby hard enough you can get all those blown calls reversed. Keep the faith, brother.
Oh, and Curtis Brown had possession in '95.
I'm sure if you lobby hard enough you can get all those blown calls reversed. Keep the faith, brother.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:23 pm to Cigars Beer Boobs
No.
No he wasn't.
No he wasn't.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:24 pm to Cigars Beer Boobs
quote:
Michael Dyer was down
Shollwuz
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:29 pm to Cigars Beer Boobs
quote:
Michael Dyer was down
link?
pics?
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:30 pm to Cigars Beer Boobs
His knees and elbow sure as hell didn't touch the ground.
His forearm didn't touch it either.
His forearm didn't touch it either.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:30 pm to Cigars Beer Boobs
quote:
Yes he was
Was not
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:32 pm to geauxtigahs87
Actually he was down......38 yards past the line of scrimmage.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:33 pm to thatguyrightthere
I'm not saying either way BUT
DJ Williams was ruled down in the Sugar Bowl in the first picture and Dyer was ruled not down in the second picture.
The whole "Front of the wrist or back of the wrist" thing is STUPID.
They are either both down or both not down, IMO.
DJ Williams was ruled down in the Sugar Bowl in the first picture and Dyer was ruled not down in the second picture.
The whole "Front of the wrist or back of the wrist" thing is STUPID.
They are either both down or both not down, IMO.
This post was edited on 1/11/11 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:33 pm to geauxtigahs87
quote:
quote:
Yes he was
Was not
Yes he was.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:35 pm to BamaChick
bamachick, i thought of the same thing when i saw this play. when they let it go, i knew the game was over.... roll tide roll..... 
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:36 pm to BamaChick
quote:
Joe Adams was ruled down in the Sugar Bowl in the first picture and Dyer was ruled not down in the second picture.
The whole "Front of the wrist or back of the wrist" thing is STUPID.
They are either both down or both not down, IMO.
No, one touched with the back of his wrist which is considered his arm, plus it was his ball hand.
The other touched with the hand side of his wrist, which is considered his hand because it's the bottom of his hand. Plus it wasn't his ball hand.
This isn't hard to figure out.
This post was edited on 1/11/11 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:37 pm to Cigars Beer Boobs
quote:
Yes he was
quote:
Was not
quote:
Yes he was.
Strong arguments here...not sure which one I believe.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:37 pm to BamaChick
quote:
The whole "Front of the wrist or back of the wrist" thing is STUPID.
Sorry you think the rules are stupid but the correct call was made and only a moron like you would try to argue it. WAR DAMN EAGLE! I'll enjoy watching you and the rest of the rednecks cry for the next 8 months.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:38 pm to saintsman49
bamachick, that Arkansas player is D.J. Williams.
But I agree.
But I agree.
Posted on 1/11/11 at 7:38 pm to BamaChick
quote:
Joe Adams was ruled down in the Sugar Bowl
does the fact the ball hand was down (adams) as opposed to dyer's non ball hand have anythng to do with it?
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News